| This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
This page is for listing and discussing possible copyright problems involving text on Wikipedia. Most listings are handled within 1 week, although some may take longer. Interested editors are invited to offer feedback, rewrite infringing content, or request copyright permission.
Listed pages appear in the bottom section of the page. For additional guidance, see below.
To add a new listing, go to today's section.
How to list an article
[edit]Copyright problems handles articles where the copyright status is disputed or complex cases of infringement. You should list an article if one of the following applies:
- All revisions of an article have copyright violations (copyvio), and speedy deletion does not apply.
- The removal of copyrighted content has been contested.
- Removal or reversion is complicated or involves a majority of the article.
- You cannot determine whether the text originated from the source or Wikipedia. Do not blank the article in this case.
- The article is eligible for presumptive deletion.
- Other complex situations not listed here or in the section below.
If the article needs to be listed,
What not to list here
[edit]- Blatant infringement. Articles that are entirely copyvio can be handled through speedy deletion if it meets the criteria. You should not blank or list the article here if you tag for G12.
- Non-extensive obvious copyvio. If the copied content is not extensive, you can remove, rewrite, or revert the page to before the text was added. You should place
{{Copyvio-revdel|url=copied source|start=diff of copyvio insertion|end=diff before copyvio removal}}on the article afterwards and warn the contributor of the material to the problem, unless advised not to. The template {{Uw-copyright}} may be used for this purpose. - Requests for revision deletion. These should be handled by placing
{{Copyvio-revdel|url=copied source|start=diff of copyvio insertion|end=diff before copyvio removal}}on the article. - Files. For files that are clear copyright violations, follow the procedure for speedy deletion; otherwise list at Files for Discussion. If the file is on the Commons, they can be handled through Commons speedy deletion or Deletion requests.
- Individual editors. Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted text or files after appropriate warnings will be blocked from editing to protect the project; see 17 United States Code § 512. If one contributor verifiably inserts multiple copyright violations and systematic review is needed, please file a request at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.
- Copyright violations without a source. If you cannot find a source of where something could be copied from, do not list the article here. The content may be removed for other reasons, like being unreferenced or violating our biographies of living persons policy.
What text can be reused?
[edit]Under the United States law that governs Wikipedia, copyright is automatically assumed as soon as any content (text or other media) is created in a physical form. An author does not need to apply for or claim copyright, for a copyright to exist. One of the following must be present to reuse the content on Wikipedia:
- Explicit statement by the author, stating that the work is either in the public domain or compatibly licensed
- Public domain due to age, source, or lack of originality
- Fair use under our guidelines for non-free content, where the text used is brief and clearly marked with full attribution
If none of the above are present, the text cannot be reused.
Even when the text can be reused, it must be attributed or it will be considered as plagiarism.
Responding to listed articles
[edit]Any editor is welcome to investigate articles listed for copyright concerns and remove {{copypaste}} or {{close paraphrasing}} tags when the problem is addressed or disproven. Only administrators, copyright clerks, and VRT agents should remove {{copyvio}} tags and close listings.
Copyright problems is run by volunteers and it usually takes a few days before listings are first investigated.
You can assist in the following ways:
- Providing information on the copyright status of the article
- Obtaining or verifying claims of permission
- Rewriting or removing infringing content without removing {{copyvio}}.
Providing information on copyright statuses
[edit]Not every article listed here is a copyright violation. The content may be on Wikipedia first, public domain, compatibly licensed, or below the threshold of originality. Editors can provide information about licensing or public domain status under listings here or on the talk page of the article. A link or a clear explanation is very helpful when a clerk or administrator evaluates the article.
Obtaining/verifying permission
[edit]Sometimes material was placed on Wikipedia with the permission of the copyright owner. The owner may be willing to give permission and proper license. Any contributor can write to the owner of copyright and check whether they gave or will give permission. See Wikipedia:Example requests for permission. If a compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, please provide a link to that under the listing.
More details about the permissions process can be seen below and at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Rewriting or removing content
[edit]If an article verifiably has copyvio, the content must be removed or rewritten entirely. If the article is blanked, the rewrite takes place at Talk:PAGENAME/Temp so that the new material can be copied over the old. The listing will link to the specific temporary page. You can directly rewrite on articles tagged for {{close paraphrasing}} or {{copy-paste}}, and remove the tags when the rewrite is complete.
The article should not be copied over without first removing copyvio. Other content from the article can be used, if there is no reason to believe that it may be a copyright issue as well. If the content is copied from an inaccessible source like a book or cannot be verified, please remove all text added by the contributor. If you copy any text from the old article, please leave a note on the listing or in your edit summaries of the rewrite. Reviewing administrators will then preserve the history of the old article.
Please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and its linked guidelines as necessary to ensure the rewrite is compliant with policy. Repairing plagiarism from permissible sources is usually as simple as supplying proper attribution.
Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia (or people editing on their behalf)
[edit]If you submitted work to Wikipedia which you had previously published and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, you must do one of the following to resolve the problem:
- Link to a note permitting reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation, ideally using the email template at WP:CONSENT.
See also Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Emails are handled by volunteers and take time to log permission. Do not worry if the content is deleted; it will be restored if usable permission is logged. Your email will receive a response whether the permission is usable or not. If you have not received a response to your letter within two weeks, it is a good idea to follow up.
Please keep in mind that content previously published elsewhere may not meet Wikipedia's specific guidelines and policies. If you are not familiar with these policies and guidelines, please review especially our core policies. This will prepare you to deal with any other issues with the text that may arise.
Should you choose to rewrite the content rather than release it under the requisite license, please see above.
Clerks and patrolling administrators
[edit]Copyright clerks
[edit]For a more complete description of clerks and their duties, as well as a list of active clerks, please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Clerks.
Copyright clerks are experienced editors on Wikipedia, especially with copyright policies and their enforcement. On this board, they are trusted to evaluate and close listings and request administrative actions when necessary.
Copyright problems administrators
[edit]For a more complete description of administrators on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Administrators.
Any administrator may work the copyright problems board. This may involve evaluating listings personally or completing requests by clerks. Clerks are trusted in their work and their requests may be implemented without double-checking, although any administrator is welcome to review requests and discuss with the clerks in question.
Closing listings
[edit]Listings can be processed at any time by anyone, but are not formally closed until a clerk or administrator verifies that all problems are resolved. Pages listed for presumptive deletion stay open for a minimum of 7 days before being processed.
For advice for resolving listings, see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Instructions (VRT agents, see section there).
{{CPC}} may be used to denote resolutions of listings by administrators, clerks and VRT agents.
Listings of possible copyright problems
[edit]Older than 7 days
[edit]- Pablo Herrán (history · last edit · rewrite) from [1]. Very closely paraphrased from the source. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Peripatetic The4lines |||| (talk) 04:31, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Article deleted due to copyright concerns. Complex/Rational 15:55, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- Te Matatini (history · last edit · rewrite) from Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from February 2025. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Tenshi! (Talk page) 21:14, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Angevin kings of England (history · last edit · rewrite) from Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from March 2025. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Bruxism (history · last edit · rewrite) from Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from March 2025. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Sennecaster (Chat) 02:43, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- Cambridge Women's Center (history · last edit · rewrite) from Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from March 2025. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Tag removed by original tagger. The4lines |||| (talk) 06:10, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Wizardman 20:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- COMMON (user group) (history · last edit · rewrite) from Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from March 2025. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Noting that this was created by a user that has an open CCI. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:38, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- According to tagger, sources being paraphrased from are [2][3][4]. Tenshi! (Talk page) 15:31, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Sennecaster (Chat) 18:24, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yan Xishan (history · last edit · rewrite) from Category:Articles with close paraphrasing from March 2025. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
- Stanisław Basaj (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.krylow.info/stanislaw_basaj_rys.html. Translationvio, unlikely backward copy; article created in 2024, Wayback has the source in 2012, and I don't think the source copied from pl.wiki (diff in 2012) but happy to be proven wrong. GoldRomean (talk) 00:43, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- Nicolai A. Grevstad (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from Hauganm. Foundational. Includes copyvio from https://web.archive.org/web/20080808112558/http://www.naha.stolaf.edu/pubs/nas/volume28/vol28_02.htm Wizardman 19:25, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Article deleted due to copyright concerns. The4lines |||| (talk) 17:41, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Carl Aaron Swensson (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from Hauganm. Foundational. Includes copyvio from https://web.archive.org/web/20120626050613/http://skyways.lib.ks.us/genweb/archives/1918ks/bios/swenssca.html Wizardman 00:53, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Article deleted due to copyright concerns. Complex/Rational 02:28, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Assassination of Ante Pavelić has a bunch of references that lead to nowhere, which looks like a copy&paste from somewhere. I told this to the submitter User talk:SpeedyHaste#Assassination of Ante Pavelić moved to draftspace but they ignored me and published it again as-is. Any assistance would be appreciated. --Joy (talk) 10:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. @Joy: Please read the instructions above. We can't accept listings with no source. From what I checked that I could access, no violations or CLOP anywhere. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Tenshi Hinanawi the article has no less than 7 different references to sources formatted like harv, but the sources themselves aren't listed in the article. When told about it, the submitter does nothing. What do you think happened there? --Joy (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- I would imagine that they're missing something because it links to nothing nor any Bibliography that it's trying to link to (that being said I haven't used this type of referencing so I can't say how it works). Tenshi! (Talk page) 18:51, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Tenshi Hinanawi the article has no less than 7 different references to sources formatted like harv, but the sources themselves aren't listed in the article. When told about it, the submitter does nothing. What do you think happened there? --Joy (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Joy@Tenshi Hinanawi - ref 1/5 ref 3 ref 4 ref 11 ref 12 - I don't have the time/mental space to look at the sources right now but I think I found all the missing ones. Sennecaster (Chat) 01:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- I can't access ref 4, no preview loads, similar issue for ref 12 as it won't load page 140. Otherwise looks clean from those sources. Tenshi! (Talk page) 19:45, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Kathleen Mannington Caffyn (history · last edit · rewrite) from [5]. Copyvio has been edited down, close paraphrasing remains. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PDH The4lines |||| (talk) 18:36, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- I've done a rewrite on the temp page. MCE89 (talk) 02:30, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Rewrite moved into place. Sennecaster (Chat) 00:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
New listings
[edit]New listings are made on daily reports transcluded on this page and are not directly added to it. To add a new listing, please go to today's section. Instructions for adding new listings can be found at How to list an article. Editors may resolve issues with listings at any time, save for presumptive deletion. See the section on responding for more information.
- Kristofer Janson (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from Hauganm. Foundational, nearly all sources used are deadlinks. Wizardman 03:12, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Article deleted due to copyright concerns. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Stibor of Stiboricz (history · last edit · rewrite) From Borsoka, all sources given are offline. Sophisticatedevening(talk) 16:53, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- The One (Vienna) (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.doka.com/at/news/press/wohnhochhaus-the-marks-the-one, https://www.wbv-gpa.at/projekt/modecenterstrasse-20/ . SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:19, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Sennecaster (Chat) 00:52, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Dhaddi jatha (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from Opus88888. Failed verification of Garland Encyclopedia of World Music. Foundational. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:57, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- ISO 860 (history · last edit · rewrite) from [6]. Sophisticatedevening(talk) 01:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- doesn't meet G12, should be deleted. Sennecaster (Chat) 03:37, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Top Station (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from Marcus334. fails verification in multiple spots, sourced to images at times Sennecaster (Chat) 01:37, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Draft:Chirakkara Devi Temple (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.hindu-blog.com/2021/08/chirakkara-devi-temple-history-gods.html. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://icd.who.int/browse/2025-01/mms/en#1630268048. — Alex26337 (talk) 10:23, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Nthep (talk) 12:51, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Battle of Monastyryshche (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://naszdziennik.pl/polska-kresy/27989,dobrali-husarie-by-pochwalic-sie-zwyciestwo.html. Noting that if this and Stanisław Basaj from WP:CP/2025 December 31 are indeed violations, I think this makes it five from this user/their socks (WP:CCI time?). GoldRomean (talk) 23:09, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- I was meaning to look into this user and their socks at some point after my comment at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2025 December 17, but feel free to look into filing a CCI request if you want to. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Sigh, in the hour or so since my listing here I think I've found at least one more vio. I'll maybe do some more digging and try to write up a case request in a day or two; it'll be an interesting learning experience. GoldRomean (talk) 00:09, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- I was meaning to look into this user and their socks at some point after my comment at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2025 December 17, but feel free to look into filing a CCI request if you want to. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Churchill Craton (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from 20130908. Three sections are uncited and are not from the given source at https://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/M44-2001-F4E.pdf. Content in lead and Hearne Domain sections can stay as copyvio has been removed. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:49, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hypercarnivore (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from 20130908. A paragraph of copyvio removed from this abstract. The second paragraph in the lead is uncited content not from this source. The remaining content can stay. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Battle of Zabłocie (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://werbkowice.pl/images/promocja/pub-luny.pdf. Much of it's already been rewritten in this diff, but there is still blatant translationvio remaining in the page history (and possible CLOP, as the main copyeditor (at no fault to them) likely didn't have copyvio in mind during their rewriting). As a concrete example, compare the passage in the article in this revision starting with
In the evening of 13 February 1944 [...]
to bottom of source p. 216 (Wieczorem, dnia 13 lutego 1944 [...]
)
- Battle of Nowa Woda (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://archive.org/details/kotlubaj-zycie-janusza-radziwilla-1859/page/192/mode/2up. GoldRomean (talk) 02:26, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Battle of Mieniany (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://werbkowice.pl/images/promocja/pub-luny.pdf. Somewhat copyedited/rewritten by others but still CLOPpy; super obvious translationvio if you look at the old revision. GoldRomean (talk) 02:40, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Haidamak uprising of 1734 (history · last edit · rewrite) from [7]. Source predates ukwiki's article and is unlikely a copy from ruwiki's. GoldRomean (talk) 02:48, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- File:Ael bc vs lovcen.jpg (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://www.kerkida.net/eidiseis/alla-spor/mpasket/ael/balkaniki-ligka-triti-seri-niki-gia-tin-ael. Junior Jumper (talk) 09:52, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Junior Jumper: CP does not handle files. Either tag for F9 or send it to FfD. Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:27, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Deleted F9 Sennecaster (Chat) 03:23, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Junior Jumper: CP does not handle files. Either tag for F9 or send it to FfD. Tenshi! (Talk page) 14:27, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- Casper Oimoen (history · last edit · rewrite) presumptive deletion from Hauganm. Foundational. Confirmed copyvio from https://web.archive.org/web/20090114022225/http://www.lawzone.com/half-nor/oimoen.html Wizardman 02:54, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Footer
[edit]Wikipedia's current date is 12 January 2026. Put new article listings in Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2026 January 12. Files should be handled by speedy deletion or Wikipedia:Files for discussion.