Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Cyclone/2

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Issues appear to have been properly addressed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:57, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited text, including entire sections. MOS:OVERSECTION in the "Mesoscale" section. Z1720 (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will be fixing it up shortly, would hate to see this get demoted. ^EF⁵ 15:11, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EF5: Do we think the mesoscale section might benefit from a section-transclusion from the main articles? 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 15:47, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that sounds like a good idea. ^EF⁵ 15:50, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No longer any uncited text. Ce'd a lot of it. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 13:24, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720, EF5, and Chicdat: is everything resolved here? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:55, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe so. 🐔 Chicdat  ^{Bawk to me!} 10:29, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EF5 and Chicdat: The article has uncited text because it uses text excerpts from other articles. These excerpt templates should probably be removed and the text replaced with prose that is cited and specific to what is needed in this article. Z1720 (talk) 12:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The subsections in Cyclone#Mesoscale go against MOS:OVERSECTION since they're all very short. "Very short sections and subsections clutter an article with headings and inhibit the flow of the prose. Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheadings." Aviationwikiflight (talk) 09:20, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]