The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service
| Consensus does not appear to exist on the tense of this article: whether the band should be referred to in the present tense (e.g., "Fun (stylized as fun.) is an American pop rock band...") or the past tense (e.g., "Fun (stylized as fun.) was an American pop rock band..."). I am thus proposing two options: that the band be referred to in the present tense ("is", "current members", etc) or the past ("was", "former members", etc). MrSeabody (talk) 05:11, 29 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Should Bonnie Blue's full date of birth be included in the article? 00:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:List of gangs in Australia
| Sorry I'm not really sure what the correct procedure is for this. I tried just asking above but nobody replied for over a week. This page worries me somewhat and I'm trying to find some people who might be able to help improve it.
It seems inappropriate to group everything into a bikie gang or an ethnic group. There are a few criminal gangs or violent political groups that are centred on a particular culture or ethnic group, but whoever started this page seems to have tried to sort everything that way. A lot of the labels, and even the groups themselves, aren't locally relevant. Australians don't tend to group Spanish and Portuguese speakers from opposite sides of the Atlantic as a group, other than possibly "immigrants", the "Hispanic" concept is an American thing. I'm not sure if everything in the white supremacist group is actually a white supremacist gang, some might be all white just by chance or locality, since that's the largest demographic in Australia. 2405:6E00:62C:4A60:148D:B7C:243C:CA13 (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Should the name of the sole survivor be included in the article? WWGB (talk) 13:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Finger pinching conspiracy theory
| The article's background section has references that mention South Korea's gender equality issues. Is their coverage pertinent or substantial enough to be included here? 00:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC) |
Should the sentence: be added after the second paragraph in the Background section? The Background section currently reads:
|
| Should the source be included? (question 1) If so, should it be included in the current manner, including the statement that the authors are "40 topic experts"? (question 2)
"The Misandry Myth: An Inaccurate Stereotype About Feminists’ Attitudes Toward Men" is currently included in the final sentence of the article's intro and the final paragraph of the article itself. Some users have argued that the source is WP:PRIMARY, and that it is therefore against Wikipedia's guidelines to use it to claim empirical proof of controversial claims, such as "The false idea that misandry is commonplace among feminists is so widespread that it has been called the 'misandry myth' by 40 topic experts" and "feminist views of men were no different than that of non-feminists or men towards men." Other users have argued that the source is WP:SECONDARY, and that it is therefore fine to include. Additionally, some users have argued that calling the authors "40 topic experts" is not adequately supported, while other users feel that being author of an academic article is enough reason to be called a "topic expert." Dekadoka (talk) 17:09, 12 June 2025 (UTC) |
| Considering the usual approach to Wikipedia:Article titles and scopes, what should the scope of the article Muffin be? WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Chelsea Wolfe (BMX cyclist)
It's my opinion that the subject of this article should be referred to as an "Olympian" and a "member of Team USA" based on quotes from sources. Particularly, this source which refers to her as Olympian Chelsea Wolfein the title and this source which refers to her as the first out trans athlete on Team USA. Other users, Fram and Topcardi, argue that she does not qualify as an Olympian because she did not compete in the Olympics, and was only a reserve member of her team that would have competed if another teammate was unable to. My request for comment is asking if yes, the article should refer to her as an "Olympian", or if no, it should not. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 16:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC) |