After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other Arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop, Arbitrators may place proposals which are ready for voting here. Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain. Only items that receive a majority "support" vote will be passed. Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed. Only Arbitrators or Clerks should edit this page; non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
For this case, there are 12 active Arbitrators of whom none are recused, so 7 votes are a majority.
Motions and requests by the parties
[edit]Place those on /Workshop. Motions which are accepted for consideration and which require a vote will be placed here by the Arbitrators for voting.
Motions have the same majority for passage as the final decision.
Motion to dismiss
[edit]1) Motion for dismissal due to lack of evidence.
- Support:
- The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:31, 27 July 2007 (UTC) I reviewed the evidence and do not see grounds for a case here.
- Although "lack of usable evidence" may be more accurate here. Kirill 04:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Paul August ☎ 18:58, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed, nothing useable. James F. (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fred Bauder 13:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Charles Matthews 15:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 03:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed temporary injunctions
[edit]Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
Template
[edit]1) {text of proposed orders}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed final decision
[edit]Proposed principles
[edit]Template
[edit]1) {text of proposed principle}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed findings of fact
[edit]Template
[edit]1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed remedies
[edit]Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
Template
[edit]1) {text of proposed remedy}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Proposed enforcement
[edit]Template
[edit]1) {text of proposed enforcement}
- Support:
- Oppose:
- Abstain:
Discussion by Arbitrators
[edit]General
[edit]Motion to close
[edit]Implementation notes
[edit]Clerks and Arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.
Vote
[edit]Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.