Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Hemanshu

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 19:24, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

• Hemanshu (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Wikipedianforever (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence:

See Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hemanshu. Looks to be a case of block evasion by Hemanshu. The newly-created account has a monobook.cs that is identical to that of Hemanshu, and it is making similar edits to the year articles, like 2009. (Hemanshu was edit-warring on the month entries in 2012, which is what led to his three recent blocks, the last of which was for one week and began on 31 December). Since a case on desysopping Hemanshu has been filed with Arbcom, it is desirable to have as good evidence on this as possible. Though a block based on the SSP report could be justified, evidence does not seem good enough for an indef. Checkusers might have more luck in determining this for sure, and should anyway do a check in case this is used as evidence for Arbcom. EdJohnston (talk) 19:24, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Confirmed. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 19:53, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ed - just to let you know that this is already being handled by the Arbitration Committee so it should probably be left in their hands for now. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 20:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Note: Socks and sleepers indef'd. Hemanshu's block length under discussion. All socks tagged. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He was desyssoped and I've extended his block for 10 days from today. — Rlevse • Talk • 03:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]