Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CValdez19

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

• Noospherix (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• ~2025-31397-19 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Time4Tinfoil (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• LeBronism (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

User CValdez19, a newly created account with only 64 edits[1], initially created a page on “Allatra,”[2] a non-notable organization supported by unreliable sources. Shortly afterward, these single-purpose accounts appeared and began adding further unsourced or unverifiable content to the same page.

If the topic were genuinely notable, it would typically be created and developed by established editors or submitted through Articles for Creation. The editing patterns strongly indicate that these accounts are SPAs with promotional intent rather than contributors aiming to build an encyclopedia. Deriannt (talk) 09:52, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The editing patterns and the fully formatted creation of the initial page strongly suggest it was produced by someone far more experienced than an account with only 64 edits. This raises the possibility that the creator may be a sock of a previously blocked user or an account being used for undisclosed or disruptive purposes. In light of this, and given the subsequent involvement of multiple SPAs adding unverified content, a CU is requested. Deriannt (talk) 09:57, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for checking, but all of these editors are single-purpose accounts with identical editing patterns, active only on the Allatra page. They are, at the very least, clear meatpuppets and are not here to build Wikipedia. I also have some off-wiki evidence. How can I forward it privately? I prefer not to disclose it here. Thank you. Deriannt (talk) 18:27, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Deriannt: - you can email me. PhilKnight (talk) 20:07, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Funkeymonky4 – This one popped up just yesterday, seems like another SPA. Deriannt (talk) 14:51, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~2025-35122-19 – another one, perhaps they forgot to login or switch accounts? Deriannt (talk) 14:55, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Unrelated. PhilKnight (talk) 15:27, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Funkeymonky4 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) also appears to be  Unrelated, though I didn't go back and recheck against all the others. -- asilvering (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---