Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Education

Shortcut
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Education. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Education|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Education. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

See also:


Education

[edit]

On My Own Technology

[edit]
On My Own Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NORG doesn't pass, no sigcov in article, and I suspect WP:COI. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ThePerfectYellow. grapesurgeon (seefooddiet) (talk) 00:22, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OpenSIS

[edit]
OpenSIS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. The article seems an advertise. ―  ☪  Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 12:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Software. ―  ☪  Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 12:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Very PROMO (with the large number of screenshots)... I've done a search, there is nothing about this "portal" (I'm not sure what it is) to be found Brief mention here [1] in a list of similar software. Gsearch brings up primary sources, then social media... Nothing we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 13:25, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete: Agreed with User:Oaktree b in toto. Not only is this blatantly WP:PROMO, it's badly written promo without any attempt to hide that it's promo. Also seems to fail WP:NOTE even excluding the promo issues. The only sources I can find are two in the first several pages of results that aren't themselves clearly promotional in nature, and neither of those are particularly high quality, or aid in notability. Foxtrot620 (talk) 16:10, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:AfD comment|1= Thank you for the feedback. I understand the concerns and will work to improve the article in line with Wikipedia’s content and notability guidelines. The goal is to provide an informative, neutral, and well-sourced entry on openSIS. I’ll revise the content and add independent, reliable sources to address the issues raised.

Kindly allow me some time to make these changes. Appreciate your consideration. Sarika os4ed (talk) 09:11, 26 June 2025 (UTC) }}[reply]

KOSPINT

[edit]
AfDs for this article:
KOSPINT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was no consensus. Searching in google news and books for "Kolej Sains Pendidikan Islam Negeri Terengganu" yielded insufficient coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 07:04, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AStA

[edit]
AStA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Needs at least one cite to prove that it is not just the German phrase for “student union”. The German article linked to Students' union also seems to lack cites. I don’t know enough about Germany to know one way or the other. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Anglia College

[edit]
Nova Anglia College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Not adequately supported by independent sources. An online search of this private institution produces press releases. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 23:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 23:29, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools. Shellwood (talk) 23:33, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Seems to be one of the many small private vocational colleges in Australia that exist to make money off international students. This article in the Australian Financial Review was the best source I could find, but it's still not really SIGCOV of the college itself. Everything else I could find was a press release. And several of the sources in the article are incredibly suspicious — the author of this "article" has a profile picture that is clearly AI generated and seems to write for a whole bunch of different spammy websites. MCE89 (talk) 08:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @MCE89: Thank you for reviewing the article and raising valid points.
    I'd like to clarify a few things regarding notability and sources:
    1. **Regulatory Recognition**: Nova Anglia College is officially registered with the Australian Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA Provider ID: PRV14356) and appears in the CRICOS registry for international education providers (Code: 04265J). This confirms the institution is legally recognized under Australian law and not merely operating for profit outside regulated standards.
    2. **Academic Uniqueness**: The college offers the *Bachelor of Technology (Electric Vehicle)* (CRICOS 116433M), which is — according to multiple sources — the first non-engineering EV-specific bachelor's degree in Australia. This isn’t a standard vocational program; it represents a niche and emerging field in sustainable transport.
    3. **Independent Media Coverage**: While I understand concerns about certain sources, the article includes references from *International Business Times Australia* and *ANZECOM*, which independently reported on the college’s program. These articles are not republished press releases, and while not perfect, they do meet the basic standard for WP:ORG and WP:GNG when considered in combination.
    4. **About Suspicious Sources**: I agree that some sources like BigTime Daily or Forbes Scotland are not strong by Wikipedia standards, and I’m open to removing or replacing them with better citations. However, deletion may not be necessary if the content can be improved by trimming weaker sources and reinforcing stronger, regulatory-based notability.
    Happy to work with the community to refine and clean up the article. Jagdishsarai (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete 2 google news hits. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 09:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Vocational schools are not automatically notable. Bearian (talk) 16:12, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. After some pretty extensive independent research, I land here. The article subject lacks WP:SIGCOV in reliable independent sources. In addition, vocational schools are not notable in and of themselves. ZachH007 (talk) 03:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @ZachH007: Thank you for taking the time to review.
    I’d like to clarify that Nova Anglia College is **not a vocational education provider**. It is a **registered higher education institution**, regulated by the Australian Government under:
    1. **TEQSA (Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency)** – listed under Provider ID PRV14356.
    2. **CRICOS (Commonwealth Register of Institutions and Courses for Overseas Students)** – Code 04265J, approved specifically to offer higher education to international students.
    3. The institution offers a **Bachelor of Technology (Electric Vehicle)**, a government-accredited, three-year **higher education degree** (CRICOS Course Code 116433M), which is unique in Australia.
    This places Nova Anglia College squarely under **WP:HIGHERED**, not vocational-level WP:ORG standards.
    While the article can certainly benefit from trimming weaker citations, it does include **independent media coverage** (e.g., *International Business Times Australia*, *ANZECOM*) discussing its educational offerings — not just brief mentions.
    I’m happy to continue improving the article to align better with sourcing and editorial tone. Jagdishsarai (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fancy Refrigerator: Thank you for starting the discussion and reviewing the article.

I’d like to clarify that Nova Anglia College is a registered higher education provider in Australia, listed under TEQSA (PRV14356) and CRICOS (04265J). The college has been featured in several reliable media sources such as *Forbes Scotland*, *International Business Times*, and *ANZECOM*, which are cited in the article. The institution also offers a government-accredited bachelor's degree in electric vehicle technology — the first of its kind in Australia — which has been independently reported on by those outlets.

I understand that notability and coverage are important, and I am happy to improve the article further if needed. Please let me know if any specific sections should be revised or strengthened.

Thanks again for your time and feedback. 2604:3D08:A67F:3B20:D56:79C0:F1AC:6030 (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Purbasthali II Government Industrial Training Institute

[edit]
Purbasthali II Government Industrial Training Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable training institute. Fails WP:NCORP, fails WP:V, Is a vanity piece by the current principal. WP:COI. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 16:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - I just removed the self-aggrandizing “Leadership” section about the article’s likely author. The rest of the article is straightforward but needs references to establish notability. This is a non-profit government school; the only promotional part was about the school’s boss. I suspect there are sources out there but have not yet looked. —A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 22:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hmmm… I was wrong about the nature of this school. From the school’s website:
    • ”Purbasthali-II Govt. Iti is a P.P.P. (Public Private Partnership Model) and impressive venture of Gobindapur Sephali Samaj Seba Samity with the West Bengal Government.”
    The website is worth a quick look by AfD participants to get a better sense of the school’s operation. —A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 22:45, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If we’re going to have an article, it would be preferable to have one about the much larger, non-profit parent, Gobindapur Sephali Samaj Seba Samity.—A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 22:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the feedback and observations. To clarify, Purbasthali-II Government Industrial Training Institute is not operating under a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model. While some earlier documents or sources may have referred to such a model, the current and official status of the institute is that of a fully government-run ITI, established in 2016 under the Department of Technical Education, Training and Skill Development, Government of West Bengal.
    It is affiliated with the West Bengal State Council for Vocational Training (WBSCVT) and functions as a non-profit, government technical institute, aimed at providing vocational training to students from rural and semi-urban areas.
    All previously promotional content has been removed from the article, and work is underway to improve the page with reliable sources and references that highlight its public role and educational impact.
    We appreciate the insights and encourage AfD participants to refer to official government sources (such as iti.wb.gov.in) for accurate information about the institute’s ownership and operation. Syeddeep2025 (talk) 07:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the feedback and observations. To clarify, Purbasthali-II Government Industrial Training Institute is not operating under a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model. While some earlier documents or sources may have referred to such a model, the current and official status of the institute is that of a fully government-run ITI, established in 2016 under the Department of Technical Education, Training and Skill Development, Government of West Bengal.
    It is affiliated with the West Bengal State Council for Vocational Training (WBSCVT) and functions as a non-profit, government technical institute, aimed at providing vocational training to students from rural and semi-urban areas.
    All previously promotional content has been removed from the article, and work is underway to improve the page with reliable sources and references that highlight its public role and educational impact.
    We appreciate the insights and encourage AfD participants to refer to official government sources (such as iti.wb.gov.in) for accurate information about the institute’s ownership and operation. Syeddeep2025 (talk) 07:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - run of the mill vocational school. Create the separate article about the consortium if needed. Bearian (talk) 16:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Baptist School (Portland, Maine)

[edit]
Grace Baptist School (Portland, Maine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kept at AFD in 2008; apparently largely on the then-held basis that all schools are notable. Tagged as unsourced since 2018 and appears to have been generally unsourced since creation aside from linking to the school's website. This is not really significant coverage. There are other such brief descriptions in the newspapers.com archives of the Evening Express, most of which are mainly drawn from interviews with the school's administration. Some minor coverage in this book but I don't think we can base an article meeting WP:NORG for a nonprofict private school based on brief annual newspaper announcements stating that the school had opened for the year and two brief passages in a book stating that the school had strict rules about hairstyles and that a "Let's get rowdy" cheer chant had been suppressed. The 2008 AFD included a reference to sources existing but none were produced. Hog Farm Talk 05:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National Student Exchange

[edit]
National Student Exchange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The overly promo tone of this doesn't help. I've tried Gbooks, Scholar and a News search, other than routine mentions (naming a president, xyz student participating), I can't find anything about this org. Sounds like a wonderful opportunity, but sourcing is sparse. The article only has primary sources at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 17:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies

[edit]
Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School that fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage found. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Redirect to Graduate Program in Public Management. It appears the Institute for Policy Studies is now defunct. Nayyn (talk) 22:54, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pujut National Secondary School

[edit]
Pujut National Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced for 7 years. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 02:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Entirely unsourced for many years. There are few things that should so immediately lead to deletion as that. PickleG13 (talk) 04:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, contested PROD reason was "NSCHOOL is not policy, school clearly exists", which I don't find sufficient. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. GoldRomean (talk) 21:38, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Micro Tech Global Foundation

[edit]
Micro Tech Global Foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:29, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - when I last edited this article > 10 years ago, WP:RSP did not exist, much less WP:RSNOI that clearly affects notability here (based on the sources in this article). Actually, when WP:RSP came to exist in 2018, MTGF may have ceased to exist already. Their last Facebook post was in March 2018. Their website went down in 2017. Their initiative, Micro Premier League, had its last Facebook post in 2018. Their parent company Micro Technologies (India) Ltd has no article here, and possibly ceased to exist in 2014, with their website going down in 2015. starship.paint (talk / cont) 06:08, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Due to WP:RSNOI, it is imperative to review non-news sources. Google Books produces four results, which all seem to be false positives (preceding MTGF's founding in 2010, or just no mention in the book). Google Scholar produces one result under "Micro Tech Global Foundation", which merely cites MTGF as a reference for " Land Use Pattern of Navi Mumbai", nothing is described further about MTGF. Google Scholar produces one result for "MicroTech Global Foundation", but this is an article written by MTGF's chairman. Google News produces one report where MTGF's chairman contributed to, and one press-release like report. starship.paint (talk / cont) 06:28, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Schools Foundation Academy

[edit]
Independent Schools Foundation Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tagged this article about an independent school with notability concerns in 2023. I have now carried out WP:BEFORE and added a reference to a book which has half a sentence about the school; but I have not found significant coverage in independent secondary sources. I don't think the school meets WP:GNG or WP:NCORP, although I am aware I may be missing sources in Chinese. It was established in 2000 or 2003, so it may be WP:TOOSOON for notability to be demonstrated. Possible redirect targets: List of secondary schools in Hong Kong and the founder, Charles K. Kao. Tacyarg (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtnut

[edit]
AfDs for this article:
Doubtnut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 12:38, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SMK Sultan Abdul Samad, Petaling Jaya

[edit]
SMK Sultan Abdul Samad, Petaling Jaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Last AfD was in 2007, we are now a lot stricter on high schools. Could not find SIGCOV to meet WP:NSCHOOL. 3 of the sources merely confirm students winning in a competition and not actual coverage of the school. LibStar (talk) 06:06, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:50, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bundesoberstufenrealgymnasium Dreierschützengasse

[edit]
Bundesoberstufenrealgymnasium Dreierschützengasse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable school notable for one event (Graz school shooting). Apart from the shooting, it exhibits ordinary characteristics shared by most schools. Celjski Grad (talk) 08:01, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the shooting would make it notable enough for its own article Jdn2004 (talk) 15:26, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what notable for one event instructs: "People known only in connection with one event should generally not have an article written about them. If the event is notable, then an article usually should be written about the event instead." Celjski Grad (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The shooting is notable, the school not so much. The Banner talk 20:32, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 15:56, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Western Canada Wilderness Committee

[edit]
Western Canada Wilderness Committee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe the topic fails to meet GNG. While I'm not the greatest at looking for sources, the only coverage I found was mentions of the organization in relation to protecting an owl species, but nothing that covered it at length. Also, while I realize that the present quality of the article doesn't determine its suitability, the condition right now is a big problem. The entirety of the current content was written by an employee of the organization named Stephanie Gribble, and is entirely sourced to the org's own website (yes, there's one other citation, but it only verifies when a law was passed and says nothing about the article subject). -- Fyrael (talk) 03:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's a great recommendation. I had never heard of The Wikipedia Library before this, and I was recently trying quite hard to get access to JSTOR. -- Fyrael (talk) 03:01, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Participants are encouraged to remove any COI or unsourced material while the AfD is still open, reducing it to a stub if necessary, which would make it easier to adjudicate this case based on the notability of its subject rather than the quality of the content.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 11:42, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kolej Vokasional Ipoh

[edit]
Kolej Vokasional Ipoh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously considered at AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sekolah Menengah Teknik Ipoh Persiaran Brash , however we are now much stricter on notability as per WP:NSCHOOL. This is an unreferenced article. LibStar (talk) 01:09, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete no references, almost no information about the school (number of students/faculty, what does it teach etc so the article is not useful either. Finally, no indication of any notability at all. --hroest 15:20, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:26, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:24, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity Christian School (Morgantown, West Virginia)

[edit]
Trinity Christian School (Morgantown, West Virginia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this school article, and added a ref. I don't see WP:THREE instances of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, however, and don't think the school meets WP:NCORP, WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL. Redirect to Morgantown, West Virginia#Private schools is a possibility. Tacyarg (talk) 19:32, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • At least Weak Keep. Ideally, I'd like to see more in depth coverage from sources from further away, but there's a lot of documentation and enough I could find from other newspapers in the state.
    • "Trinity, St. Francis Schools Expand in Morgantown" (Feb 2006)[2] State Journal, Charleston
    • "Trinity Christian School Breaks Ground on New Wing" (November 2004)[3] Dominion Post
    • Residents Question Trinity Christians Impact (August 2004)[4] Dominion Post
    • "Trinity Christian opens new campus, transportation issues arise"(April 2005)[5] Dominion Post
    • "Trinity Adds Finishing Touches" (August 2005)[6] Dominion Post
    • "Trinity for sale to highest bidder: Bank looking to sell bankrupt Christian school" (May 2010) [7], Dominion Post
    • "Bank wants to sell bankrupt private school in Morgantown"(May 2010) [8], Charleston Gazette
    • "Trinity to keep school: Reaches deal with bank for $5 million" (July 2010) [9] Dominion Post
    • "Prep Sports:: Morgantown Christian school getting ready to tackle football" (Jan 2009) [10]" Charleston Daily Mail
    • More[11][12][13][14][15][16]
There are also hundreds of more routine sports articles, which actually makes it difficult to find the more in depth ones Jahaza (talk) 23:48, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete as private school it will have to pass WP:NORG and I dont see any substantial in depth coverage from multiple independent sources. There is some coverage from a single newspaper but a lot is run of the mill and not in-depth, one single source is not multiple and trivial coverage of sports events does not constitute SIGCOV. --hroest
  • Weak keep - compared with most independent schools, this seems to get a lot of (at least local) media coverage. Bearian (talk) 17:17, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Weak arguments on both sides of the fence here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep In situations like this, I would normally go to Newspapers.com for sources. However, content from that state is surprisingly scarce. Sources in old newspapers likely exist, but they are hard to find. BeanieFan11, you are much better at navigating the Newspaper Archive than me. Is there anything you can do? The Knowledge Pirate (talk) 19:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:12, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Royal College Choir

[edit]
Royal College Choir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SCHOOLCRUFT There is no indication as to why this school choir qualifies as notable. Obi2canibe (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:14, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of Engineering and Technology

[edit]
Institute of Engineering and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not look to be a notable institution. Barely any in-depth coverage on the same. Most of it seems to be trivial mention or paid PR Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • weak keep this is a public university with over 1000+ students and there is some coverage of it in various sources: [20] [21]. It is not extensive but probably enough for an University. --hroest 15:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:32, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 05:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand Asian Studies Society

[edit]
New Zealand Asian Studies Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Unreferenced for 15 years and fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom FMSky (talk) 11:31, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: If there is interest in changing policy, an individual AfD is not the place to do so.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 05:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

J.S.S. Academy of Technical Education, Noida

[edit]
J.S.S. Academy of Technical Education, Noida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot be salvaged with a merge. Lacks any coverage by third party outlets. Heavily relies on primary sources. Huge chunks are so simply copy pasted Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 22:30, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Allblessed (talk) 15:36, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow

[edit]
Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This institution does not seem notable either. Relies heavily on primary sources or sources that are not independent from the subject. There is nothing out there proving that the institution is notable. Did a google search and there are barely any sources out there. Would suggest a deletion. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 22:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 13:16, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rajkiya Engineering College, Azamgarh

[edit]
Rajkiya Engineering College, Azamgarh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No in-depth coverage. Relies solely on primary sources. Also lacks WP:ORGDEPTH when I did a search Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 22:28, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why the page needs to be deleted. The college is the only engineering college in Azamgarh run by government

dear wikipedia editors I request you, not to delete the article as it is important for people concerned with the college Nilambhan (talk) 05:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not a good enough reason to keep the article Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 20:40, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Destinyokhiria (talk) 09:54, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

National Insurance Academy

[edit]
National Insurance Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see any sources by which to judge the school to be notable, with WP:NCORP being applicable to this private business institution. The sole reference in the article seems to be lost, but based on its title ("NIA: 100% placement with highest package of Rs 10.5 lakh per annum") and what had been referenced to it, it seems to have been a PR-push. (I don't think independent media are going out on their own to examine insurance academy placement rates and report on them.) Largoplazo (talk) 00:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NIASOM, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:03, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep The prior deletion is sufficiently old; I believe it now qualifies under WP:NORG. It is a governmental unit of India created in 1980. It presently necessitates further citations to enhance its notability. Promotional content is an issue that can be reduced.CresiaBilli (talk) 08:23, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, I'm not finding such sources to cite. Largoplazo (talk) 11:56, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:VAGUEWAVE, WP:SOURCESEXIST. You have not identified any actual coverage. One of many throw away boilerplate !votes from this individual. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:03, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisted to gather more thorough input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 05:25, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I do not add comments (WP:VAGUEWAVE) at afd without any analysis.. As I mentioned in my vote for "Weak Keep," there are not a lot of resources available on the web. On the other hand, I have made an effort to locate references that might offer more waitage in order to satisfy Notability Standards.. [22], [23], and [24].. CresiaBilli (talk) 05:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You can't tell from the language and subject matter that these are PR placements, not business journalism? As I noted in my nomination, actual news writers aren't tracking and then marveling at the annual job placement rates of new graduates from individual trade schools. And the first of these is attributed to Mediawire, a press release distribution agency. Largoplazo (talk) 11:20, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One last attempt to reach quorum
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 02:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions

[edit]

No articles proposed for deletion at this time