Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/2025/November

Proposals, November 2025

[edit]

Please check how many articles qualify for a stub type before proposing it.

NEW PROPOSALS

[edit]

Mongolian politician stub

[edit]

Proposal to create Mongolian politician stubs, {{Mongolian-politician-stubs}}, every other east asian countries have their own stubs. East Asian politician stubs have a lot of uncategorized pages of Mongolian politicians. - Egzs (talk) 05:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but we already have {{Mongolia-politician-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:08, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As Opal says, we already have the template, we normally wait till we have 60 articles to go with a category. Waacstats (talk) 16:50, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, a lot of the Mongolian politician articles are not categorized because of no specific category. I can raise the amount, if its okay Egzs (talk) 17:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, currently 25 articles use this template. Her Pegship (?) 19:07, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crossotini sub-stub

[edit]

I propose making Frea (beetle) stubs, {{Frea-stub}} - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 16:56, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Columbellidae sub-stub

[edit]

I propose the following split for Columbellidae stubs:

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Camaenidae sub-stub

[edit]

Split for Camaenidae stubs:

Support looks good. Waacstats (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ziguinchor region geography stubs

[edit]

Senegal geography stubs is pretty big; I propose the following split:

Support looks good, might be worthwhile having templates for the other regions. Waacstats (talk) 16:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Irish Conservative Party MP stubs

[edit]
Support looks like a good start, I was planning at looking at myself. Waacstats (talk) 16:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tetraserica stubs

[edit]

Melolonthinae stubs is pretty beefy; I propose the following split:

Support looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This weeks speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The list for this week

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Film stubs breakdown

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Following on from last weeks theme, there are two more film categories that are closing in on 600 articles and I would like to breakdown in the following ways:

templates for any decade we have articles for and categories for any templates that have 60 articles Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hungarian footy players

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
The hungarian midfielders have surpassed 500 articles and so I would like to split this by decade of birth as per numerous precedent and while we are at it to do the same with the defenders and forwards which we have done elsewhere.

obviously templates for each year and categories for those years that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of some footy cats

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Some of the football categories are creeping over 500 or 600 articles, I'd like to cull these back a bit unfortunatly we have already split by position and decade of birth of birth. Following the example set in the Russian categories I will propose the following splits:

obviously templates for each year and categories for those years that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Aussie rules footballers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Sticking with the theme from above, a couple of Australian rules football by decade categories are starting to get to the point of needing a split. I propose the same thing here:

obviously templates for each year and categories for those years that pass 60. Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Olympic medalists

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Three countries have more than 500 articles in there Olympic medalist categories. I would like to prune these back with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Rissoidae stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600, we can cull this back with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support; gets them off the list :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Polyommatini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category is over 600, we can cull this back with the following:

Waacstats (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:58, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

More Cassidinae sub-stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
More splits for Cassidinae stubs:

After this is created, I plan on notifying Categories for Discussion to upmerge Oediopalpa stubs - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me Waacstats (talk) 19:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Terelliini stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I propose the following sub-stubs of Tephritinae stubs:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This weeks speedies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
This weeks list

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1910s drama films

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create as revised.
Not sure about this one but given the fact that there are over 1000 articles here. the following would take over 400 articles:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, but I think it would be "1910s lost", not "Lost 1910s", though I could be wrong... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch, that fits in better with the existing perm cats, I'll change this to
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1960s Italian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support go for it :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:34, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1970s Italian film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1920s British film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1930s British film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category over 500, could do with a cull I propose the following:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of 1930s French Film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 600 articles I propose the following split, that should halve the category:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Musical film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 articles I propose the following split by decade:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Musical comedy film stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Over 500 articles I propose the following split by decade, and subcat to the above:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

US state house politicians

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A couple of US states have already had there politician stub categories split out members of the state senate and state house, 4 of these are now over 500, i propose following Wisconsin's example and splitting by party:

Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Democratic party member of the Wisconsin State Assembly stubs

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Having mentioned the Wisonsin State Assembly above, the Demoocrats could do with a cull, following their Republican colleagues I propose a by decade of birth split such as:

templates for all decades we have articles with categories for those that reach 60. Waacstats (talk) 10:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.