Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Libraries

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Libraries and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Shortcut WP:LibrariesWP:Libraries

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Libraries This page is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries

Syracuse University has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:46, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Asian Library has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 21 § Asian Library until a consensus is reached. Cnilep (talk) 02:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone mind checking if GNG was met for Draft:Illinois Heartland Library System? I think there should be enough articles in Illinois newspapers about the creation of this library system... WhisperToMe (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alamo Area Library System has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced and unimproved for 15 years. Apparently no longer exists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 01:24, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I looked around online, and the most recent sign of existence that I saw was around 2006. I think it probably has closed/been re-organized out of existence. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Bush has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Library of Congress Classification:Class A -- General Works and other articles about Library of Congress classifications are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether they should be deleted.

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Library of Congress Classifications until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the articles during the discussion, including to improve the articles to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the articles until the discussion has finished.

Graham11 (talk) 23:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]