Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Jersey#Collaboration

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject New Jersey and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 30 days

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
New Jersey This page is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey

WikiProject New Jersey

General information Main project page talk  -  Discussion archive Project banner talk Newsletter talk  - Signup Participants talk WPNJ To-Do List talk Articles Article alerts talk Article Assessment talk  - Requests  - Change log Categories talk  - Stub sorting Collaboration talk Deletion Watch talk New Articles Recognized Content Tools Images and maps talk Templates talk Template List talk Portal Task Forces New Jersey Education Hudson County Related Projects WikiProject New Jersey State And County Roads WikiProject Rutgers

The article on the Kirkwood-Cohansey aquifer states that the aquifer's water contains unhealthy levels of mercury. The article on the New Jersey Pine Barrens/Pinelands says that the water is among the purest in the United States. Both cannot be right. Jcbowers18 (talk) 19:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

AT&T Corporation has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Emiya1980 (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are most pages not able people section ordered by last name alphabetical? Wouldn't chronological by date of birth make more sense? Considering people are listed by first name ordering by their last feels jumbled when ordered by DOB shows the progression and provides more ease of reference. Sfasano1070 (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Alphabetical order by last name, first name appears to be the standard nationwide and makes searching by name possible. Alansohn (talk) 03:51, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  That makes sense, thank you very much Sfasano1070 (talk) 08:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Rodman has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]