Talk:Marilyn Monroe#rfc 21C0410

Featured articleMarilyn Monroe is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 1, 2016.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 23, 2015Peer reviewReviewed
October 16, 2015Good article nomineeListed
November 26, 2015Peer reviewReviewed
December 26, 2015Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 15, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Marilyn Monroe was featured on the cover and on the centerfold of the first issue of Playboy?
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 14, 2005, January 14, 2006, August 5, 2007, August 5, 2010, August 5, 2012, August 5, 2015, August 5, 2018, August 5, 2020, and August 5, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

Merilyn Monroe

[edit]

Dear Sir or Madam, Merilyn Monroe was born Norma Jean Baker nit Mortenson, so it would be proper to have it corrected. With kind regards, Blazenka Krizan 77.78.225.4 (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: Lead image

[edit]

Which image should be used for the infobox of the article, after previous multiple discussions at Talk:Marilyn Monroe/Archive 5#Infobox image, Talk:Marilyn Monroe/Archive 7#Lead image replacement and Talk:Marilyn Monroe/Archive 8#Time for a wikibox image change?. Absolutiva (talk) 05:51, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutiva (talk) 05:51, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Again? As before, B, the current image, which of these choices is the most natural and shows Monroe as a person living in the colorful world and not a sexual symbol living in front of posing-backgrounds. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:22, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • B. Rcarter555 (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • B - not a glamor shot, just a photo of a person, as in other WP articles. Netherzone (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Summoned by bot) I would say that A or D most align with capturing the subject in a manner that most aligns with her public image and the core of the career from which she derived her notability. They also seem to be most technically proficient and sharp of the images, for their given sizes and resolutions. That said, really any of these images is perfectly suitable and fit for purpose. SnowRise let's rap 22:58, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If we go by public image then many initial photographs on Wikipedia would have to be changed, including age-related photos (many actors and actresses, notable for their work while younger, are portrayed here as elders, and others would be portrayed while in costume as in D). In Monroe's case, she was a very good actress who could put on "Marilyn Monroe" at will, but did not live life as her character. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I also want to mention that if we go by pubic image alone, then C is instantly recognizable to many because of the ubiquity of Andy Warhol's Marilyn Diptych. (Personally I think that image of her makes her look "sleepy".) I understand what Snow Rise is saying, but still think that the natural, human image of B is most appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Randy Kryn makes a good argument for using B. BTW, I was summoned here by Yapperbot. Netherzone (talk) 23:47, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It's funny (and I mean this sincerely), but I've always felt that, as an impressionistic matter, a more professional portraiture image feels more appropriate to an encyclopedic biography entry. But I don't think there's policy/style guidance on point either way, so I'm just noting that as a "it's funny how two people can look at the aesthetic goal of a particular function in the same way, but come to opposite conclusions about how to achieve it" kind of observation. SnowRise let's rap 00:10, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as to the first point, that's an WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Maybe those articles would also benefit from such adjustments in their lead image selection, or maybe there would be counter-balancing factors. At the moment, having been FRS'd here to choose between these images for this article, I can only tell you which of them calls out "Marilyn Monoroe" (slightly) more paradigmatically to me. And yes, of course she was in reality a person with dimensions beyond her public image. But to represent her as an encyclopedic subject, I see no issue with assigning an image which is somewhat more prototypical of her stage presence and public persona.
That said, I must emphasize again that all of these images are suitable, and the differences between them negligible. Honestly, the slightly sharper focus and technical prowess of the first and last image are what stand out to me as the best arguments for using one of them, but if I arrived on this article and saw any of the four in the infobox, I would not take it for anything but a perfectly valid selection. SnowRise let's rap 00:10, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If the article wasn't about Marilyn Monroe, I wouldn't have known those pictures were of Marilyn Monroe since I have never seen one of her films. But I do recognise that famous photo as Marilyn Monroe. She is also a bona fide icon, known for things other than her acting, among those things is that famous photo that has been copied, given homage to and parodied the world over. I know WP:RECOGNIZE is about names, but I wonder if the guideline could apply to photos as well? TurboSuperA+(connect) 08:16, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TurboSuperA+, nice summary, and if the article was solely about her character that would be a good one. That event, the subway wind film shoot, actually was seen by her husband Joe DiMaggio (where'd he go?) who fumed about it and caused a major rift in their marriage as well as a bruise or two, so yes, it is a personal biographical image as well. An interesting lead image idea, and it'd be my second choice among the nominees. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I still favor B as "representative of a person who is no longer alive". The subway wind photo is iconic in relation to the film The Seven Year Itch, and I think it should be moved up in that article to the spot now occupied by the image, "Ewell reprised his Broadway role and Monroe replaced Vanessa Brown". Netherzone (talk) 12:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The subway wind photo is iconic in relation to the film The Seven Year Itch
I disagree, I think it has "outgrown" the movie so to speak. This is how Vanity Fair describes it: It's an image everyone has seen: Marilyn Monroe flirtatiously posing over a subway grate, her white dress fluttering in the air. Filmed on a late summer night in Manhattan, this moment from The Seven Year Itch is the most enduring depiction of the blonde icon. [1] TurboSuperA+(connect) 13:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]