User talk:Zuck28

This is Zuck28's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 12, Nos. 326, 327, 355, 356, 357 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: New: Alphabet run X, Y, Z | Food and drink | Women who died in 2025 Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements: Global Translat-a-thon 2025 06 December 2025 Tip of the Month: Lists of deaths by year is a good resource for the December / January meet-up Women who died in 2025 Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help wanted! Want to apply your skills or learn new ones? Help us plan monthly events, design event logos, come up with a tip-of-the-month, and/or provide any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:20, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Giorgia Andriani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:40, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2026, Vol 12, Issue 1, Nos 357, 358, 359, 360 Online events: New: Sports (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run - countries starting with A Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2025 Announcements from other communities Wikipedia turns 25! Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2026. Tip of the month: Consider becoming a new page reviewer to help reduce the huge backlog of women's biographies. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranjani Mazumdar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranjani Mazumdar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 03:51, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Mohamed Bzeek when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:15, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. Zuck28 (talk) 05:39, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Sadhvi Prem Baisa when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:25, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hildegard Björck, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:47, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zuck28,

Thank you for creating Palestinian Journalists' Syndicate.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It would be good to provide more sources that are not press releases.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Smallangryplanet}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Smallangryplanet (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification! Zuck28 (talk) 20:46, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nadine Roberts, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:42, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:51, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello. I understand the speedy deletion concern due to prior history. This article is currently being updated by other editors with improved formatting and independent sources. Please allow some time for these updates to be completed. If the subject is still found non-notable after a reasonable period, the article can be removed per policy. Thank you. Muhskk (talk) 14:33, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the name is changed? Zuck28 (talk) 14:34, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have page-move permissions. The article was started/edited by another editor, and the name change was made during updates. If appropriate, I request an editor with move rights to please move the page to Dinesh Sudarshan Soi. Thank you. Muhskk (talk) 14:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you concerned? Zuck28 (talk) 14:51, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. "Speedy delete" means nothing in an AfD. "Delete per nom" does not carry any weight in deletion discussions, especially if the nom is a blocked sock. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:21, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you for the insight. I sometimes use Speedy because it is an option available in the voting tool, I misunderstood that for an assertive strong delete button. Also, that user was not blocked when I voted, later I initiated an SPI and tagged suspected users but the checkuser refused to check and just blocked one user from the list I added. Anyways I will keep this information in mind for the future edits!

Thanks again and happy editing! Zuck28 (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And then I see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Filmy Charcha, and I find you back at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohd Sharia again? Drmies (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Again the nominators were not blocked, that time. Zuck28 (talk) 03:33, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve noticed that you often handle deletions of articles that don’t meet Wikipedia’s standards. I recently came across an article Tanishq Rajan that in my view may not fully satisfy notability and sourcing requirements. I’d appreciate your thoughts on it when you have time. Thanks. ButterflyCat (talk) 08:33, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ButterflyCat, Thank you for reaching out. It looks like the subject is non-notable, and I have started an AfD regarding the same.

Happy editing! Zuck28 (talk) 08:42, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking and starting the AfD. I appreciate it. Happy editing(: ButterflyCat (talk) 08:46, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sunil S Gupta what about this? There have The Times of India soures but only mention Award and recognition not any BLP related info ButterflyCat (talk) 12:41, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved the article, seems to pass WP:ANYBIO. Zuck28 (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I can’t edit the Bajrang Dal article due to extended protection. I think the recent Kotdwar shop-name controversy should be added to the “Criticism, controversies, and militant activities” section ButterflyCat (talk) 12:27, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe later! Zuck28 (talk) 12:28, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... take your time ButterflyCat (talk) 12:30, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ekta Jain and Prerna Arora Please crosscheck both article, what you think it's Pass? ButterflyCat (talk) 14:43, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated both of them. Zuck28 (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect ✔️ ButterflyCat (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This article Vivaan Arora have only 2 unnecessary sources ButterflyCat (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wp:BEFORE, indicates there are multiple significant coverage available. Zuck28 (talk) 05:43, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You’re right. I’ve just noticed the WP:BEFORE guideline. I’ll work on updating the Vivaan Arora article by adding available reliable sources and improving the content accordingly. Thank you for pointing this out. ButterflyCat (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Zuck28 Hey, what about this article [1] reason non notable subject WP:PROMO and sources are mostly WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Please check it. ~2026-89123-1 (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2026-89123-1, More than 100 sources, how can you prove them all invalid? I suggest you to perform cleanup and remove unnecessary bad sources first. Zuck28 (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Zuck28 This article needs community check so nominate it for Afd. It should go through Afd once. I've try to nominate but couldn't fullfill. ~2026-88912-3 (talk) 18:01, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why you using temporary account and you want advance editing.. may i know reasons? ButterflyCat (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:ONUS. You have now reverted content three times instead of adhering to it. When it comes to a BLP with something being challenged, you will need consensus. Not sure how else to say it as it was already stated in the edit summary. The talk page is there for discussion. CNMall41 (talk) 07:28, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is not revert, I searched for a source and added information accordingly. Zuck28 (talk) 07:29, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed this as neither source says anything about where she went to school. I suggest using the talk page as we do not allow information on BLPs that is not reliably sourced, especially when its not even in the source you provided. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:33, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And this is clearly marked as coming from a press release. Wikipedia is not here to correct misinformation on her date of birth. If there is a question as to what the real one is, we do not include it per WP:DOB. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:36, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Editors are recommending to assume good faith. Just because you don’t understand certain language or can’t agree with something, you should not remove the sources blatantly like this.

" जॉर्जिया ने एक इंटरव्यू के दौरान कहा था, 'मैं फिल्में बनाना चाहती थीं इसलिए मैं इटली से लंदन आ गई। लंदन आकर मैंने फिल्म मेकिंग कोर्स को ज्वाइन किया। इसी दौरान मुझे बॉलीवुड के कई प्रोजेक्ट्स में काम करने का मौका मिला। मैं कैमरे के पीछे रहकर काम करना चाहती थी।'" mentioned in the source.

Another English-language source for her filmmaking course in London is here, which you can read and understand. Also, press releases are primary sources, and primary sources are generally acceptable to verifying personal details. Zuck28 (talk) 07:40, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am assuming good faith. I would suggest not attempting to paint me as someone who isn't, when you are still defending the fact you placed information without it being verified from a source. Even the content you pasted above says NOTHING about her moving to India. It also says she took a filmmaking course (saying she studied filmmaking infers she went to film school). And, still not mention of the date of birth. It is also her stating the information so no secondary soruce verifying it. Finally, Masala is not reliable in the most recent discussion at RSN. You can start a thread on the talk page but I won't argue about content here. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I added everything along with the sources. And about her moving to India, there are various other sources already in the article along with her career in India as evidence of moving to India, so no need for redundancy. Also, taking a filmmaking course is the same as studying filmmaking, and if you think it is not, removing the content is still not a good thing to do, one can reword the sentence. Again, primary sources are generally used to verify personal information on Wikipedia. I will leave this discussion here for now. Zuck28 (talk) 08:01, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

How is it redundant? You can use a source multiple times. But don't expect readers to search through the page for a reference to support content when it should be inline. The reversal was not for the filmmaking course, it was used to show how what you wrote was misleading (which goes inline with the DOB, moving to India, etc.). --CNMall41 (talk) 08:06, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In the same section "Early life and education" (next paragraph), it is explicitly mentioned that she moved to india. So no need to search through the page for reference. And if something sound misleading, it is always better to reword the sentence instead of just removing it. Zuck28 (talk) 08:23, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

We are at an impasse then. See WP:SATISFY. Either do according to guidelines, specifically BLPPRIVACY, or get consensus to do it contrary to guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:36, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Two unnecessary votes have come from new accounts. I am feeling scared that maybe these are the same people who have been targeting us since the time the page was created, and who abused us a few days ago. Maybe they created new accounts just to add delete votes? If 2–3 more delete votes come like this, then the majority will be in favor of deletion. Is that fair? Maybe until the new accounts clearly explain their reasoning, we should put a cross mark on their votes? Right now, on the Kotdwar controversy article, two delete votes have come from new accounts. From Wikipedia’s point of view, how will this be seen?" ButterflyCat (talk) 08:42, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No need to worry or get scared. The closing admin will see the facts and the arguments along with the policies and guidelines. Afd judgments are not based on the number of votes but on the facts. Also, you can start a Wp:SPI, with evidence if you have suspicions of wp:SOCKPUPPETRY. Zuck28 (talk) 08:47, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oh..wow. that sounds like a new adventure on Wikipedia. I will definitely look into that and proceed accordingly. Thank you!(: ButterflyCat (talk) 08:50, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Giorgia Andriani. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. I have begged you numerous times to follow WP:ONUS. Instead, you continue to bludgeon your preferred versions. The content is being objected to and it is up to you to get consensus for inclusion. Final warning..please use the talk page and get consensus. CNMall41 (talk) 03:36, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I actually self-reverted so as not to be crossing into 3RR territory. I will ask that you revert and start the discussion on the talk page as you should have already. If you don't, I think the best thing would be to escalate to ANI as the unreliable sourcing, reverting in violation of BRD and ONUS, FAKREREFs, FANCRUFT, and failure to obtain consensus is crossing into WP:TE territory. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The same rule applies for you, you shouldn’t remove something which is properly sourced without discussion. Zuck28 (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No, you have an obligation per WP:ONUS. Are you going to revert this and start the discussion or should it be taken to ANI? Either way is fine, but please let me know as this is original research on a biography that needs addressed. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is not original research, the information is sourced from her exclusive conversation with an Indian media house. And I have mentioned that explicitly. How do you expect someone to express their views without engaging in an interview or conversation? I think you are confused between Primary and non-reliable sources. Primary sources are generally accepted as reliable for verifying information like this. I don’t know how you expect me to verify her statement without even using an interview as a source. Zuck28 (talk) 03:48, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You are avoiding the question so let me asking it plainly. Are you going to revert and start a discussion on the talk page per WP:ONUS? --CNMall41 (talk) 03:57, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have not reverted 3 times yet, and if you want to address it on the talk page, start it and I am willing to discuss. Here, I am also cooperative in discussion. No need to revert because it is not yet three reverts and we are already addressing it here. If you can give me a valid reason to revert my edits, I have no objection. Zuck28 (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it is a WP:CIR issue but 3RR has nothing to do with ONUS. I started the discussion. Final time, please revert so it can be discussed. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Despite agreeing to, "adhere to the policies regarding notability, verifiability, neutrality, content and editing, and avoid behaviors that could lead to suspicions of COI editing, sockpuppetry, or abuse of multiple accounts," you are now failing to do so. Not sure what is going on but the conduct noted above is what you agreed NOT to do.--CNMall41 (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Giorgia Andriani has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You were told this was a copyvio yet removed the speedy tag twice. It is now up for deletion. You should already be aware of that because there is a notice on your COmmons talk page about this one as well. CNMall41 (talk) 06:43, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The issue has been already discussed on commons and it is not a copyright violation. An admin has reviewed the image. Zuck28 (talk) 06:45, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is now at a deletion discussion. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:50, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zuck28. Thank you for your work on Kramik Yadav. Another editor, Johnson524, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Great work on recreating this previously deleted article! Have a blessed day 🙂

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Johnson524}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Johnson524 15:12, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article meet Wikipedia:Notability? @Zuck28 Bzik1995 (talk) 03:13, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it passes Wp:GNG. Zuck28 (talk) 06:33, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that the sources I’ve added with help stop the pages from being deleted? FireBros (talk) 20:12, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunately no. Zuck28 (talk) 20:13, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you go into detaAil, please? FireBros (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

NO! Zuck28 (talk) 20:17, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please elaborate. FireBros (talk) 20:18, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you using this newly created account and why do you want to save that article? Please elaborate first. Zuck28 (talk) 20:19, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Because I want to save them from deletion. FireBros (talk) 20:21, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Zuck28 (talk) 20:21, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Why not; tell me why these sources may not save the articles. FireBros (talk) 20:24, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wp:SIGCOV, Wp:GNG and Wp:NFILM. Zuck28 (talk) 20:30, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In my personal opinion, the sources will save the pages from deletion. FireBros (talk) 20:33, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

FYI This turned out to be a sock. Blue Sonnet (talk) 04:37, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I started an SPI for the same, but due to a lack of evidence, it was delayed by a checkuser. Zuck28 (talk) 07:49, 19 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Zuck,

I noticed you made some changes to the draft I’ve been working on (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Afusic

). Thanks a lot for taking the time to review it I really appreciate it.

Just to clarify, I personally haven’t submitted it yet, but I noticed it was previously submitted by another person and got rejected at AFC. That’s why I’m trying to be extra careful before resubmitting it.

When you get a chance, could you please review it and let me know if it looks ready to be resubmitted, or if there’s anything important that still needs work? Since you have more experience, your input would really help me point it in the right direction.

Thanks again for your help! Jameskida (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out @Jameskida. Don’t worry I will surely help when I get time. Zuck28 (talk) 17:04, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much ! Jameskida (talk) 17:39, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Happy Editing! Zuck28 (talk) 17:58, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bruhhhhh… that was quicker than Chuck Norris 😂

For real I blinked and it was live........

I’ve been working on that draft since 4 November 2025. Built it completely from scratch. Honestly, I was kinda scared it would get rejected again (I think it already got rejected twice 😅), so I just kept it sitting in drafts.

If I had known it would go live this fast, I would’ve approached earlier. I seriously want that kind of confidence and expertise.

Thank you again. Now I can finally show off to my friends that I worked on that page from the very beginning.

Thanks once again..... Jameskida (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	That was quicker than Chuck Norris 😂 Jameskida (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I did ask for this to be re-opened as stated on the talk page of Afusic. Wanted to notify you here so that you know I posted more details about this and other incidents. CNMall41 (talk) 03:19, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]