- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Genetic memory (psychology). Any useful content can be merged from the history if deemed useful by editorial consensus. Sandstein 16:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Blood memory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article seems to have no basis in fact. It cites legitimate scholarly sources in order to support a pseudoscientific notion of genetic memory. I will note that the article is written by someone who chose the name Bloodmemory, who has only ever edited this article. Bananabananabanana (talk) 13:53, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Genetic memory (psychology). We already have an article on this stuff and this adds little, being pretty much incoherent. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Genetic memory (psychology), condensing this article down to a small section or paragraph. Some of the sources are useful but subject matter doesn't appear to merit a full article. Interesting enough from a historical viewpoint to warrant at least a mention IMO. -Rushyo Talk 14:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect Seems to cover same topic as Genetic memory (psychology). If it can be shown to be clearly different, it might merit its own article due to the included refs, despite the weakness of this article at present (just because something's untrue or pseudo-science isn't reason for deletion). --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:21, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge - currently this is a WP:FORK, and even in the lead, admits is the same thing as 'genetic memory'. In common parlance, 'blood' is used an a synomym for 'genetics' or DNA. Bearian (talk) 19:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.