- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:16, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Corporate Colonization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This academic essay clearly violates WP:SYN. It does not merely describe Stanley Deetz' theory, (but offers an evaluation of it and related work; there might be a possibility of an article on the general subject, , but it would best be done by starting over. A more likely possibility is an article on Deetz. DGG ( talk ) 05:11, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:34, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination; an essay of original research. Prose like this is one of the reasons we don't have a viable political left in the USA: Organizational identity is developed through a process of your 1) self-identity, based on reflective narratives of one’s perception of one’s self; 2) identity regulation, the discursive processes and practices that effect social identity construction; and 3) identity work, the interpretation of the discursive practices that produce an identity, interacting with each other in order to produce a cohesive and substantial identity. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:52, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination; clearly original research. Not the place for manifestos. --Cox wasan (talk) 14:07, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Merely an essay, not suitable for Wikipedia in its current state. JoshyDinda (talk) 19:00, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.