Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design Life Cycle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Design Life Cycle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Poorly referenced original research. Article author has promised but not yet delivered improvements. The Design Life Cycle has also been speedied twice. --Finngall talk 03:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can't find anything in articles, books, or websites that uses the topic in the way this article does. While there may be a Design Life Cycle developing, it doesn't seem to have primary sources published yet. An article will need to wait for reliable, independent secondary sources. StarryGrandma (talk) 02:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now and at best WP:TNT as my searches found nothing good and the article could use a restart. SwisterTwister talk 05:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.