- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 20:18, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence-Based Design Accreditation and Certification Program (EDAC) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Evidence based design may be a notable trend, but there is no indication that this particular certification is a notable. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:55, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete there would be tens of thousands accreditations available worldwide. No evidence this one is more notable. LibStar (talk) 14:27, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.