Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fassforward

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 11:34, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fassforward (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Besides WP:FORBESCON and non-notable awards, I'm not seeing any SIGCOV for this company. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:13, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Edits have been made including more sources to prove notability and the page is no longer an orphan. vfrank (talk) 11:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: sources are press releases, non-WP:RS (blogs, contributor posts, sponsored content, etc.), interviews or written by those affiliated with company. I don't think there is a single source that meets WP:NCORP much less multiple. S0091 (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:54, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.