Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felsenthal CPU-73 A/P Air Navigation Attack Computer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Felsenthal CPU-73 A/P Air Navigation Attack Computer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sources are either primary, or unreliable, or straight-up not talking about the article's subject. BilletsMauves^€500 14:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I find no sources and the article does a poor job of explaining what this thing does. No sources, vague article. delete. Oaktree b (talk) 15:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete in the absence of sources establishing notability. -Ljleppan (talk) 07:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.