- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- ISO 639-1 language matrix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Already copied to Wikiversity ([1]), but this doesn't seem to qualify for speedy deletion as per WP:A5. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISO 639-1 language matrix. Specifically, though the information may be useful to linguists, translators, or others, there is no context explaining the standard or the languages named here. The "matrix" is of no apparent use to readers of an encyclopedia qua encyclopedia. Since it has been copied to Wikiversity, deletion from Wikipedia seems in the spirit of the earlier deletion discussion. Cnilep (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.