- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The assertion that this fails WP:CRYSTAL was not adequately refuted. No prejudice against re-creating the article if/when this becomes a reality. ‑Scottywong| soliloquize _ 20:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Indian Science Engineering Eligibility Test (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per WP:CRYSTAL. Nothing official at all about this. Any needed material could be added to the IIT-JEE article till there is reasonable media coverage. There has been some media coverage, but most of it is about proposals, and nothing concrete is there, least of all a name for the test. Lynch7 18:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. After this meeting, I don't think that the so called "ISEET" is happening soon. Lynch7 14:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable kite flying exercise Greglocock (talk) 06:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep The article topic is highly notable in India and has considerable widespread media coverage, with more than 1 million Indian students (who now give IIT-JEE and AIEEE)supposed to appear in this exam when it starts. The Government has already declared it. Although there are some disagreement and protest against it. Although the author has not done a good job so far but article needs to stay and needs expansion-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 07:28, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "When it starts" is the key here. Really, all this rhetoric about how many students are writing it is unnecessary. Once it is officially declared, then it makes sense to have an article on it; otherwise it'd just be crystal ball gazing. Lynch7 06:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This clearly is not wp:CRYSTAL as its not an unverifiable speculation ) the subject of the topic has disturbed a hornets nest, and it has been a topic of extensive debate and discussion in both print and live media. As far as the "Indian Education" subject is concerned this topic is highly notable (specially for Indian readers.) Thats all i would say. regards -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 08:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "When it starts" is the key here. Really, all this rhetoric about how many students are writing it is unnecessary. Once it is officially declared, then it makes sense to have an article on it; otherwise it'd just be crystal ball gazing. Lynch7 06:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Sourabh.khot (talk) 17:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 01:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with option to recreate if the plan to institute this becomes reality. Tom Reedy (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, or rename to something like Indian Science Engineering Eligibility Test controversy, since that topic is what appears to be notable. 66.159.220.134 (talk) 18:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strongly Keep This might be the future for admission into IITs n NITs. Even if it is delayed, this article contains info that is an important chapter in the history of admissions into India's elite institutes of science & technology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anir1uph (talk • contribs) 16:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but edit to indicate the controversy. It will almost certainly remain notable even if the test is abandoned. DGG ( talk ) 04:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.