Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MathLeap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:43, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MathLeap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find WP:RS to meet WP:GNG. CNMall41 (talk) 21:46, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 01:52, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Self-sourced web site. Could be speedied under A7 (web content with no indication of significance) or G11 (unambiguously promotional). —David Eppstein (talk) 06:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per DE.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  10:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 15:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Too soon at best, not enough coverage. SwisterTwister talk 23:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.