Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Models and Methods of Quantitative Economics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's usefulness to members of the university fraternity has a significant difference to our policies on what content is encyclopaedic, and what constitutes a reliable independent source. Daniel (talk) 12:40, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Models and Methods of Quantitative Economics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely promotional piece on non-notable short higher-education course. No reliable sources, no indication either from sources or from the text that it's notable. De-prodded without explanation. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 18:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete - no independent description of notability. -M.Altenmann >t 18:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication for why this course is notable. --I am One of Many (talk) 06:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The piece is well written with reliable sources on a higher-education course. The page provides more information on the program with links that will be very useful to prospective students and also to professors seeking international placement for their students. (Brainy749 (talk) 08:41, 2 February 2015 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.