- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 04:48, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Modular Economics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are no reliable sources which refer to a concept called "Modular Economics". This appears to be a subtle advertisement for a company called Modular Economics, as evidenced by the external link provided at the bottom of the article. Even if it's not an advertisement, the term still doesn't exist in reliable sources. SnottyWong verbalize 22:12, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Only four hits on Google scholar for Modular Economics—four. And not one of them is about modular economics. The article seems corporate-buzzwordy, and the fact that it says that a particular corporation is the preferred source of this service makes it a rather clear advertisement. The content of http://modulareconomics.org/ is off my bullshit meter, and I don't see it discussed at all based on a search for "Modular Economics" -wikipedia -modulareconomics.org. RJC TalkContribs 16:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Advertising and original research; Scholar and Books does not seem to know this as a specific term of art in this form, and all hits seem to be from chance conjunction of the two words. I removed the link to the website. They're encouraging their supporters to promote the use of the term on Facebook and such.[1] Looks like another "Zeitgeist Movement" to me. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete advert for fimr, nn neologism -- term not used in economics. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 17:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.