Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number Permutation Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Number Permutation Systems

[edit]
Number Permutation Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is one of a flurry of short, unreferenced articles differing by only a few sentences with the same final paragraph, all about individual courses taught by someone named Charlie Banacos, a person about whom Wikipedia has no article, and with no context context within which to evaluate their notability even collectively, let alone individually.

Also nominating:

Comments:

  • Delete Delete all, per nom Clubmarx (talk) 03:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all and put relevant info into a new article about Banacos. I and some other editors have already discussed with the original author the direction this should take, and he is already working on it. He was a newbie, and as newbie mistakes go, this was fairly minor. (BTW, I prodded some of these articles as well.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:42, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Don't you really mean merge in making the !vote you just did? If so, these pages need to be retained for GFDL reasons, although as redirects or protected redirects not as articles. AndyJones (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note to closing admin suggest you check if any of this material gets merged before closure, and if it has been, close as a merge not a delete. I know that doesn't look like the consensus, but I think you'll agree it would accord with most of the rationales given above. AndyJones (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.