- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Parallel democracy model (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Original research. Hippopotamus Logic (talk) 16:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unsourced since 2009. Nakon 16:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced page which also seems like original research, mostly. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 17:50, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unsourced social science gobbledygook. Incoherent. Carrite) 18:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no scholar hits at all. WikiDao ☯ (talk) 23:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no print hits neither -> hoax/OR. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.