- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Italian Democratic Socialist Party (2004). The lone argument to keep is not backed by sources or relevant P&G's. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 06:19, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Party of Democratic Reformers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's truly strange that this page was kept following the latest Afd: the party, born from the split of another tiny party, is unknown and insignificant, and completely lacking in WP:Notability. Sources on this party are practically nonexistent. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 16:36, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Italy. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:25, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to Italian Democratic Socialist Party (2004), no need to merge as the page already include all the relevant information. Beyond the legal dispute the one-man-party was virtually non-existent (no meaningful political activity, no elections, no secondary coverage). Googling "Partito dei Riformatori Democratici" I see only four results, three of them being Wikipedias' pages. Cavarrone 04:50, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is there more support for the redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 18:06, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Keep — This party had a short history, but should have a place in Wikipedia without an unuseful merger, let alone a deletion, for the sake of readers. --Checco (talk) 06:04, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Is there anything you think Wikipedia shouldn't keep? There isn't a single source on the web about this party, yet you claim the page should be kept (without any real justification). Can such a reason be considered valid?--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 20:03, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Given that a page on a similar party (a one-person party with 0 sources about it and a page written in four lines) is IMHO rather indefensible and should be deleted, since no other user has intervened, I think it should at least be transformed into a redirect (all the information on the page is already contained in Italian Democratic Socialist Party (2004)).--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 21:37, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
- Is there anything you think Wikipedia shouldn't keep? There isn't a single source on the web about this party, yet you claim the page should be kept (without any real justification). Can such a reason be considered valid?--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 20:03, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 06:22, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Merge/Redirect to Italian Democratic Socialist Party (2004) per WP:ATD.4meter4 (talk) 03:12, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.