- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Framing (social sciences). GedUK 13:24, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Political frame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- This page was prodded at 16:18, 15 November 2010 by User:WikiDan61 with the comment "This phrase is used by different authors to mean different things. No signs that the usage coined by these particular authors is in any way more notable than any other usage.", but it seems to need proper discussion. It is sitting over an old article of the same name which was merged with another at 04:46, 10 April 2007. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect It was my mistake to prod the article as the edit summary read "creating new article". I neglected to check the page history to see that the page was not new, but hijacked. I don't think a deletion is in order; rather a restoration of the page to its state as a redirect prior to 15 November 2010. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 10:48, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I now see that the page I prodded was new, but was later moved to replace the existing redirect. I still believe the existing redirect should be restored, as the current content talks about only one concept of a "Political frame" and does not significantly expand on Framing (social sciences). WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 10:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 04:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.