- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 02:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- SSLPost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe this topic fails Wikipedia:Notability and the article is written in an advertisement-ish way. Sumana Harihareswara 02:46, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No reliable secondary sources in the article, and a Google search finds nothing in the first few pages besides for sites affiliated with the company and press releases; I think this is a reliable indicator here, as one would expect some results for a contemporary internet-based company. הסרפד (call me “Hasirpad”) (formerly R——bo) 04:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:18, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Could not establish notability. -—Kvng 20:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.