- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Userfy - non admin closure by nominator following comments by the article's creator. This is an incomplete student project. andy (talk) 22:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Social dynamics of communication technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Original research which doesn't even deliver what it promises: the subject is "just beginning to be explored" and "the implications... are enormous". No encyclopaedic value, nothing to merge elsewhere. Fails WP:OR. andy (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. This article is being developed by a group of 13 communication students who are researching and compiling articles on the effects of technology upon social dynamics. I wrote the introduction and added the first links, but over the next 6 days, my students will be adding the rest. If, after the next 6 days, it fails to meet Wikipedia's standards, please feel free to delete it. Thanks! josh 09:03, 6 September 2010 (PST)
- This should have been created in user space, then moved to article space when in better shape. Unless you object I'll move it to a page in your user space. andy (talk) 16:19, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Edited article and added source for initial claim. More to follow soon. 09:13, 6 September 2010 (PST). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwmisner (talk • contribs)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.