- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 03:03, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Venerate Affinity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NN neologism. No G-hits for the full term outside Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 15:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No Bing hits, either, other than the WP article. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. Someone's new word for a non-contractual civil union. The ceremony of Venerate Affinity is a social union between people that seals a bond of kinship. It is a formal event in which interpersonal relationships are acknowledged and celebrated. It is not recognized as a legal or economic contract. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:MADEUP. Pburka (talk) 20:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. I can't find any evidence that this concept exists outside this Wikipedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 18:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 18:37, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:OR. I'd like to see the inclusionists argue for this one. LibStar (talk) 16:27, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.