- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. LFaraone 00:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- Writopia Lab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:COI issues, by user:Writopiawiki. Also, doesn't seem notable. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. czar · · 16:58, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment
Also see Rebecca Wallace-Segall with same issues. czar · · 17:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:05, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. There are definitely COI issues but they are surmountable in this case. The group appears to enjoy press coverage from many reliable sources (when Wallace-Segall isn't the one writing the articles) per their press page. Any number of these articles (non-SPS) would suffice for the GNG. Now whether W-S is independently notable is another story. czar · · 17:20, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.