Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 25#Knowledge Graph

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 25, 2025.

• Tail wing → Empennage  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Tail-wing → Tailplane  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These should point at the same target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:36, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Probably target both to empennage, which includes a section on tail planes, or disambiguate. Cremastra (talk) 15:16, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• It could also refer to a canard or a delta wing. I suggest disambiguating. Carguychris (talk) 17:28, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Earl Hilliard Jr. → Earl Hilliard Sr.  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Son of a former representative who was a state representative himself. I think this is better as a red link to encourage creation Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 19:01, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been following because I am curious about the outcome. Seems a reasonable redirect to me. No one is precluded from starting an entry on the subject (as I did in draftspace). Whether leaving something as a redlink is superior encouragement to create the article rather than linking to an article where the subject is noted is an interesting question. But our goal is to serve our readers as best we can with what info we have. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Israeli–Palestinian conflict solutions → Sinai option  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Sinai option, one of many proposed "Israeli–Palestinian conflict solutions", was created at the redirect title in 2023, and moved recently by @Lionel Messi Lover. Despite the long history, I think this still should not be pointed directly at any one solution, given both the plural and the fact that this elevates this particular proposal (not, I think, a particularly prominent one) above others. I think this should be a disambig page, though if there exists a good overview page that would make a good alterative target as well. Israeli–Palestinian peace process is the closest I've found, but it isn't very well suited in my opinion. Rusalkii (talk) 01:25, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with the entire nomination. The only other option I've found is List of Middle East peace proposals#Israeli–Palestinian peace process but I consider that inferior to Israeli–Palestinian peace process - not only does it mark that as the main article, but it doesn't include the Sinani option, the Jordanian option and probably others too. We also don't have a single category or template that I've found that lists the various proposals. Thryduulf (talk) 01:57, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There is support to retarget to Israeli–Palestinian peace process, and I would have closed this, but what prompted me to relist was the nom's words that this target .. isn't very well suited in my opinion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:24, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support relisting to Israeli-Palestinian peace process, but I think the page merits an article of its own right. However, it will take time to develop this redirect into its own article. This redirect is a violation of WP:NPOV since it seems like Wikipedia is advocating for the Sinai option. Therefore, I think it should be redirected quite hastily and then developed into an article later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easternsahara (talk • contribs) 23:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DAB per WP:NPOV. Mast303 (talk) 03:30, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This discussion somehow got left behind on the April 13 log page even though that log page was supposed to be cleared months ago. Bringing it back into the fold.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Berlin and Leipzig Railway → History of rail transport in Germany#Epoch 0 (1835-1870)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete Broken anchor, redirect title is not mentioned in the target article Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 12:38, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Berlin-Anhalt Railway Company. I think this is what the redirect is referring to. There is a mention of it in Berlin–Halle railway#History but I think Berlin-Anhalt Railway Company is the better option for the redirect. Katiedevi (talk) 20:02, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Great Storm of 2012 → Hurricane Sandy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Might also referred to 2012 Great Britain and Ireland floods, Great Arctic Cyclone of 2012 or other notable storm in 2012 A1Cafel (talk) 10:31, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as ambiguous. Most of my (personalised) results relate to a storm that affected north east England in June 2012, but on the first two pages there are also hits related to Hurricane Sandy, a storm impacting north east Scotland in November 2012 and a storm impacting Cheboygan County, Michigan that December. Thryduulf (talk) 12:20, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as ambiguous. I wish people would stop creating year-based redirects for weather events with no geographical qualifiers; almost every major weather event happens more than once in any given year. Carguychris (talk) 17:32, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Un bandido apodado el Matafácil → Chespirito (TV series)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target page leading to WP:RSURPRISE. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:13, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Infection with ''Trichomonas'' → Trichomoniasis  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of ''Ancient Aliens'' episodes → Ancient Aliens#Episodes  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

These titles bypassed a blacklisted entry on MediaWiki:Titleblacklist that was added to the blacklist in late 2014. (See MediaWiki talk:Titleblacklist/Archive 4#Request to add to title blacklist for further details.) Both of these titles were created after 2014. Neither of these have a technical need to exist. (The blacklist entry was created since consecutive apostrophes in titles cause issue with wiki markup on pages.) Delete both. Steel1943 (talk) 04:27, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Cremastra (talk) 15:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to violating the blacklist. --Schützenpanzer (Talk) 00:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Feral gummint → Federal government of the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Sadly, this is not the Onion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 04:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It's a pointless redirect that nobody literate enough to use Wikipedia will need to use in order to find the page for the U.S. federal government. RandFreeman (talk) 08:26, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This ain't the Hillbillypiedia, dadgummit. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:18, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• █████. It's nearly invisible. It was a lapse into mild humor.

I half made up the term. I searched for it here, half-expecting to find it here. It wasn't, so I added it. I Googled today for "feral gummint" and I see 350 hits (only 1 from Wikipedia and no mirrors), most referring to the US, but some referring to other federal governments such as Australia and Canada. Example: "Oh great.. the Feral Gummint has a part to play to play in this.."

I wonder how anyone noticed it. (Maybe browsing "What links here" from [Federal government of the United States], with "Hide links" enabled? Maybe browsing "User contributions for A876" with "Only show edits that are page creations" enabled, clicking "500" and then "Next 500" to reach my very first additions, and then finally noticing this the 30th one from the bottom?).

I wonder how many people noticed it before someone sought to kill it off. (I have nominated even-more-pointless redirects from absurdly improbable misspellings for deletion, and somehow absurdly got turned down.) In 2007, Wikipedia in several ways "was" The Onion. No need to be sad about it. Often Wikipedia seems much better than it was; sometimes it seems hopeless.

(I recall noticing a comical fictitious entry in the index of a college textbook. I think it said "Humor, sick" and it referred indirectly to the stylish new out-of-sequence info boxes that someone had forced the editors to tediously add to many pages.)

==See also==

• Gummint (not "created" by me, but mentioned in my edit comment upon "creating" Feral gummint on 2007-08-17)

• Gubmint (not "created" by me)

Maybe redirect to Federation#Federal governments, copying Federal government?

Maybe move all three to Wiktionary?? They are deliberate semi-fake vernacular uses. -A876 (talk) 22:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• USFG → Federal government of the United States  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too ambiguous a redirect. Googling it turns up something way different. Thepharoah17 (talk) 04:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. On Wikipedia, the current target is very clearly the primary topic, with USD Follonica Gavorrano being the only other use (this should be linked in a hatnote). On Google the primary topic is the United States Facters Guild, but I've not found a single mention of them on en.wp. Thryduulf (talk) 12:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Disamiguate convert to disambig page. There being the USfedgov, UsFG (USD Follonica Gavorrano), and variant form USF&G; for a 3-entry dab page -- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 21:24, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I didn't find USF&G in my searching, but that can be included in the hatnote as well, we shouldn't take people to a dab page when there is a clear primary topic. Thryduulf (talk) 22:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Divisions of the Netherlands in World War II → List of Dutch regiments in World War II  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of Dutch Divisions in World War II → List of Dutch regiments in World War II  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Wrong target, and there doesn't appear to be a divisional list out there. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:04, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also List of Dutch Divisions in World War II, which redirects to the same article. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:06, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Added List of Dutch Divisions in World War II to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 04:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Yonas Kibreab → Elio (film)#Voice cast  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This actor played in several other films and not only Elio. Elio is probably the most popular one, but it's still not a good reason to redirect. It's better to have it as a red link. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 01:31, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]