Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 November 5

< November 4
November 6 >

November 5

[edit]

Template:Universal page list with custom separators

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 November 13. Izno (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Universal page list

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 November 13. Izno (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Karl Schäfer Memorial

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These non-notable competitions have all been redirected to Karl Schäfer Memorial, rendering this table obsolete. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:40, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination this is a list of pages that all redirect to one page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:59, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RM (cash)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Substitute and delete. One transclusion, unclear use otherwise. Steel1943 (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not used in any articles. - Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:02, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Culture sidebars part 9

[edit]
Note: Template:Culture of Libya already redirects to Template:Libya topics
Note: Template:Culture of Malawi already redirects to Template:Malawi topics
Note: Template:Culture of the Canary Islands already is a footer navbox and is functionally indistinguishable from topics navboxes. (Same goes for Template:Culture of Madrid Community and Template:Culture of Andalusia, and Template:Valencian Community topics)
Note: All other countries and dependent territories in Africa do not have a culture sidebar, but only a topics footer navbox.

Nominator's rationale: Follow-up to Culture sidebars part 1, Culture sidebars part 2, Culture sidebars part 3, Culture sidebars part 4, Culture sidebars part 5, Culture sidebars part 6, Culture sidebars part 7 (ongoing below), and Culture sidebars part 8 (ongoing below). NLeeuw (talk) 19:06, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all per nom and prev discusions —Matrix ping mewhen u reply (t? - c) 21:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/merge we have too many sidebars and these ones are not helpful. PARAKANYAA (talk) 10:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Graph:Stacked

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The template is marked as deprecated and has only 3 article uses left. The MediaWiki "main version" (according to the /doc) was deleted (MW:Template:Graph:Stacked). The /doc says to use COMMONS:User:Tomastvivlaren/graphDataImport to replace usages. Gonnym (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Graph:Population history

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 21:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The template is marked as deprecated and has only 4 article uses left. The MediaWiki "main version" (according to the /doc) was deleted (MW:Template:Graph:Population history). The /doc says to use COMMONS:User:Tomastvivlaren/graphDataImport to replace usages. Gonnym (talk) 16:37, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nominator's reasons. nothing more needs to be said! -Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:57, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Culture sidebars part 8

[edit]
Note: Template:Culture of Cuba already redirects to Template:Cuba topics
Note: Template:Culture of El Salvador already redirects to Template:El Salvador topics
Note: Template:Culture of Jamaica already redirects to Template:Jamaica topics
Note: Template:Culture of Nicaragua already redirects to Template:Nicaragua topics
Note: Template:Culture of the United States already redirects to Template:United States topics

Nominator's rationale: Follow-up to Culture sidebars part 1, Culture sidebars part 2, Culture sidebars part 3, Culture sidebars part 4, Culture sidebars part 5, Culture sidebars part 6, and Culture sidebars part 7 (ongoing below). NLeeuw (talk) 14:03, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of Argentina

[edit]

Procedural withdraw: This nomination cannot proceed until Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 October 8#Culture sidebars part 6 has been carried out. Sorry for the confusion. (At User:Nederlandse Leeuw/Culture sidebars#South America history sidebars you can see my proposal, which I'll postpone until Culture sidebars part 6 has been processed). NLeeuw (talk) 13:43, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Nederlandse Leeuw well that discussion ended in merge, so there is nothing stopping you from implementing that merge and then continuing with this. Gonnym (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym Well wouldn't that be confusing? I'd rather not mix things up. NLeeuw (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you think it will be, then sure. Close this and reopen at a later date. Gonnym (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete pls stop spamming country navigation templates with every damn link possible.

Moxy🍁 23:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be better to convert these sidebars into new footer navboxes rather than merging them into existing country navigation templates? I think I'm starting to understand your objections, now that we're dealing with much larger templates than I started this series of culture sidebars TfMs with. NLeeuw (talk) 23:53, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Precisely - as per WP:NAVBOX (MOS) Moxy🍁 00:17, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Moxy Okay. One issue is that WP:NAVBOX never defines a maximum number of links. With Benjitheijneb, I've been working on User:Nederlandse Leeuw/Campaignboxes#Maximum links rule, where we set 50 links as a maximum for campaignboxes (which are technically sidebars rather than navboxes). I think we could take that as a rule of thumb for our purposes here as well? If you agree, then the next step seems straightforward.
At User:Nederlandse Leeuw/Culture sidebars#South America history sidebars, I've outlined how many links each history sidebar has, and how many of them are actually transcluded (which may included transclusions from pages that are not linked, but that's fixable). What I would propose is to only count the transclusions, and use them as a basis for new footer navboxes. E.g. the 8 transclusions of Template:History of Suriname. I'll put links to those 8 articles in this new footer navbox, add them to the bottom of those 8 articles, and then nominate Template:History of Suriname to be Just-deleted. (I might add the 5 missing transclusions in this case as the number is still very small). Sounds good? If you agree, then I'll proceed.
The only real problem might be converting Template:History of Brazil (174 links, 85 transclusions). 85 is still arguably way too much for a footer navbox. What would you suggest? Cheers, NLeeuw (talk) 08:06, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merger of this nature is crazy. We should not go out of our way to make templates inaccessible. Moxy🍁 04:49, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. But you shouldn't revert mergers that were carried out after a discussion to merge them reached consensus. That could be taken as disrupting the process.
Nevertheless, I am very much open to splitting off a UK culture footer navbox from Template:United Kingdom topics in order not to make the latter too loaded with links (what you called "mass link spam"). You've convinced me that it's important to consider the resulting total number of links in a merged template. Sometimes we should convert a culture sidebar into a new navbox footer rather than merge it into an existing topics navbox footer, and this seems a good example of just such a situation. NLeeuw (talk) 12:18, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is why It may be best to bring this to the wider community - what I am seeing is a small group of editors forming a local consensuss that is the opposite of what our editing guidlines says is best. Simply no way most will think adding every Society article to the template bellow follows our editing guidlines WP:NAVBOX...that said if the future plan is conversion over merger it may workout.Moxy🍁 14:01, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Moxy Okay. How would you suggest we bring this to the wider community? An RfC? Personally, I am trying to refine my approach by turning my overview at User:Nederlandse Leeuw/Culture sidebars into a proper essay that may eventually evolve into a guideline. I'm using the 50+ links and transclusions a lot as a rule of thumb in order to recommend against some of the larger mergers I've recently proposed, and now (thanks to your objections) I am reconsidering. There are several examples we might use to base a general rule for separating society/culture footers from other "topics" footers that would get overpopulated, or are arguably already overpopulated (Gotta keep 'em separated! ). Quoting several examples I wrote earlier elsewhere:
So, while it may be obvious that a template should probably be split if it has more than 50 links and/or transclusions, it may not always be obvious how the split should be made, and into how many new templates it should be split. What do you think? NLeeuw (talk) 15:18, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
PS: At User:Nederlandse Leeuw/Culture sidebars#What to do when not to merge?, I summarise this discussion and propose a standard model for country and territory topics templates with fixed parameters, so that the total number of links can never exceed a certain number. (Kinda like an infobox, in which parameters that are not recognised simply will not display anything). NLeeuw (talk) 15:58, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have been here a very long time and in my opinion you're one of the greatest editors in regard to how your taking some criticism on something that is clearly a good faith effort...... your approach of compromise and common sense is a breath of fresh air. If your spearheading further endeavors of this nature I'm am very confident you have what's best for our readers in mind. ..... Special Barnstar coming your way in the near future.! Moxy🍁 21:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Moxy Thank you so much :D I'm trying. I know I'll sometimes make mistakes, and that I should try to correct them rather than pretending I'm always right. Fellow editors like you have a way of seeing my mistakes that I myself failed to see. We need each other to move forward.
I just hope I haven't been overwhelming you with questions, and asking your thoughts on how to improve the situation. So far you have been very patient with me, and I appreciate that very much, especially when we are dealing with complex issues that require a lot of effort to properly disentangle and figure out. Cheers, NLeeuw (talk) 21:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Culture sidebars part 7

[edit]
Note: Template:Culture of Cuba already redirects to Template:Cuba topics
Note: Template:Culture of Jamaica already redirects to Template:Jamaica topics
Note: There is already a Template:Aruba topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Aruba
Note: There is already a Template:Barbados topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Barbados
Note: There is already a Template:Cayman Islands topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of the Cayman Islands
Note: There is already a Template:Curaçao topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Curaçao
Note: There is already a Template:Grenada topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Grenada
Note: There is already a Template:Guadeloupe topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Guadeloupe
Note: There is already a Template:Martinique topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Martinique
Note: There is already a Template:Montserrat topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Montserrat
Note: There is already a Template:Saint Kitts and Nevis topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Saint Kitts and Nevis
Note: There is already a Template:Saint Lucia topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Saint Lucia
Note: There is already a Template:Saint Vincent and the Grenadines topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Note: There is already a Template:Turks and Caicos topics; we never needed a Template:Culture of the Turks and Caicos Islands
Nominator's rationale: Follow-up to Culture sidebars part 1, Culture sidebars part 2, Culture sidebars part 3, Culture sidebars part 4, Culture sidebars part 5, and Culture sidebars part 6. See also Culture sidebars part 8 above. NLeeuw (talk) 13:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all per previous discussions —Matrix ping mewhen u reply (t? - c) 17:22, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect comics templates

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:R comics with possibilities with Template:R with possibilities; Template:R comics from alternative name with Template:R from alternative name; Template:R comics to list entry with Template:R to list entry; Template:R comics from merge with Template:R from merge; Template:R comics from related word with Template:R from related word; and Template:R comics to section with Template:R to section, respectively.
Note that this isn't a proposal to merge all these templates into one huge template, but to merge the comics redirect templates into their non-comics equivalents. I think the comics redirect templates should be merged into their respectively similary titled templates, without the word 'comics' in them, because they otherwise serve similar purposes, and I don't see the point of them being separate. I'm open to the proposals of the templates without the word 'comics' in their titles having the {{{comics}}} parameter instead if that's what Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics and its participants want. I'm surprised these proposals weren't made sooner. I've deliberately excluded 'Template:R comics naming convention' from this proposal because it serves a specific purpose and because there's no non-comics-related template similar to that one. PK2 (talk; contributions) 12:44, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I've deliberately listed all the above templates in this one discussion because I don't see the point in having separate discussions for each of the respective comics redirect templates and their non-comics equivalents. PK2 (talk; contributions) 00:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TadgStirkland401: The nominator wants to merge all the comics into the non-comics. I.e. merge the first with the second ("R comics with possibilities" with "R with possibilities"), the third with fourth ("R comics from alternative name" with "R from alternative name") and so on. Christian75 (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As of 2025-11-09 I feel that the proposal is clear enough (replace all the "R comics" templates with their regular counterparts), and I weak support because this also seems unnecessarily redundant to me. If anyone has a good reason for keeping them then I'd be interested to hear it! But my hunch is that it's just historical cruft. Hopefully an automated replacement can also automatedly "add {{WikiProject Comics}} to the talk page of the redirect" or whatever (if anyone actually cares about that; I don't really know) as well. Dingolover6969 (talk) 05:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per voidxor. Christian75 (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support the actual intent here. This was mislisted as a single merge (i.e. to one template), when the intent is clearly to merge {{R comics with possibilities}} to {{R with possibilities}}, then separately merge {{R comics from alternative name}} to {{R from alternative name}}, and so on. This should be done unless there's a compelling reason we need to divide each of these "R with/from/to generic_maintenance_categorization" rcats into topical subdivisions, and that comics in particular should be one of those subdivisions. (Even if that's actually true in some case, it is not necessarily true for all of them.) We shold do all of these merges in absence of a strong showing that one or more should not be merged. This is basically useless micro-intersection, of a sort that badly mixes categorization types and purposes. The identification of something as a comics topic is already accomplished (and is a reader- as well as editor-facing matter) by comics topical categories of the usual sort. Meanwhile, "R with/from/to generic_maintenance_categorization" categories are maintenance only and just editor-facing (nor do these generally need to be topically split, since editors working on categorization of, and other maintenance pertaining to, redirects that go in such categories are doing so on a cross-topical basis. Another way of putting it is that a redir being from an alternative name (or whatever) and it also pertaining to comics is a trivial intersection and non-defining characteristic.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  21:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I've just clarified my proposal to request to merge the comics redirect templates into their regular non-comics equivalents. I've deliberately listed all the above templates in this one discussion because I don't see the point in having separate discussions for each of the respective comics redirect templates and their non-comics equivalents. PK2 (talk; contributions) 01:48, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question to supports: You are all saying you support the nomination, but three of you said per "SMcCandlish" which (if I read correctly) isn't in support of continuing with the comic-specific categorization. So it would seem the intent here is to replace (or redirect), rather than merge any functionality. Gonnym (talk) 07:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, no need to differentiate FaviFake (talk) 18:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Only Support merging the comic variants of these R-cat templates into the corresponding general templates with matching names. For the avoidance of doubt, I Oppose merging the various R-cat templates that do not include the word comics. The proposal is badly worded and confusing at first glance. It would have been clearer if a separate proposal was made for each template that it was proposed to merge with its corresponding target template; as I interpret the proposal, it is only proposed to merge Template:R comics from merge into Template:R from merge, etc. This is not actually a proposal to merge all these templates together, even though it appears to be one based on the way the templates are listed. Hence my partial opposition. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 04:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I've just clarified my proposal to request to merge the comics redirect templates into their regular non-comics equivalents. I've deliberately listed all the above templates in this one discussion because I don't see the point in having separate discussions for each of the respective comics redirect templates and their non-comics equivalents. PK2 (talk; contributions) 23:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all the "redirect comics" after they have been replaces with the "normal" R-templates. My first vote was support, but it was unclear what I was supporting, but still per user:voidxor. strong oppose merging. Christian75 (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support if I've understood correctly that this is fundamentally equivalent to replacing "R [media type] from [relationship between source and target article]", at least for those articles to do with comics. If we have "Redirect from alternative name", we don't need a more precise "Redirect from comic with alternative name", for example. I think I'm in agreement with BobKilcoyne. UndercoverClassicist T·C 11:33, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:NOPAGE Freddy[citation needed] 18:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE ~SG5536B 15:29, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question - Will this have any effect on the 109,000 uses of {{R with possibilities}} other than to add that template to a few comics redirects? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Daask (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support mergers of 'R comics xyz' to equivalent 'R xyz' templates and categories. The duplicate 'comics' categories serve no useful purpose. There is no clear rationale for comics' special treatment and this is likely to lead to inconsistent tagging. Oppose adding 'comics' parameter as I have not seen any rationale for adding this. Overall, I support simplifying Rcats and not having a million ways to subcategorize them unless there is a meaningful benefit to maintenance or another aspect of the project. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 16:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pallas class frigate default image

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Infobox ship image template. Gonnym (talk) 11:36, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nacra 17 World Championship medallists

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after this edit. Gonnym (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox settlement/checkauto

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub template. Seems to have been replaced with something else. Gonnym (talk) 11:33, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Textbook WP:T5... -Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox settlement/borough converter

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:22, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub template which isn't linked from anywhere. The code makes this seem as if this is a subst template, however preview (after removing the includeonly) shows unsupported parameter errors and the no documentation, no incoming links, and no updates in 9 years suggest no one uses this. Gonnym (talk) 11:31, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Textbook WP:T5... -Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox road/shield/KEN

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:23, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub template. Probably replaced with Module:Road data/strings/KEN. Gonnym (talk) 11:28, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Textbook WP:T5... -Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:53, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox road/areamask/MEX

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub template. Probably replaced with Module:Road data/masks/MEX. Gonnym (talk) 11:26, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Textbook WP:T5... -Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:53, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Language templates/styles.css

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after this edit. Gonnym (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Textbook WP:T5... -Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:54, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ITL map

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused location map template. Gonnym (talk) 11:03, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Football in Pernambuco

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. If added to all articles it links to during this TfD let me know, and I'll withdraw nomination. Gonnym (talk) 11:03, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nominator's reasons. nothing more needs to be said! -Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:58, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cyprus problem detailed map

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map template. Gonnym (talk) 11:02, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete glad this is unused. A nightmare for accessibility. - Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:57, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Climate change and health

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 November 13. Izno (talk) 21:48, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 November 13. Izno (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Works by Chuck Black

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only 1 article, not useful for navigation. Οἶδα (talk) 00:08, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - what is this monstrosity?! No use to anyone or anything. There isn't even an article for the subject Chuck Black (Note Draft:Chuck Black is about a different Chuck...). -- Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I had the same reaction... Οἶδα (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the main topic does not have an article, then in most cases, there is no valid reason for a navigation template. Regardless, only one article with a link here. Gonnym (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Zackmann and Gonnym; no article, no template. Frank(has DemoCracy DeprivaTion) 09:50, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.