- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:37, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Unneeded sidebar. We don't need a sidebar for every world leader or politician. Only seven links are of relevance to the subject matter. Such a small grouping of links for the subject and for a sidebar. 15 pages are in Cain's category. This can be converted into a navbox. 3 can be removed since they are related to Cain's 2012 campaign and not to himself directly, but nonetheless, a sidebar is still not needed if adding in those links from the category. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nominator, not everyone needs a sidebar. This is covered in the relevant navboxes and just clutters the article --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:10, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:39, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Article content on template space. Does not even function well on Smith's article. Delete without subst. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks like a huge blank space under the "Life" section, which looks terribly confusing. Knotsworth (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:40, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
This template seems to have been moved into project space 9 years ago, and is unused. It, and the redirect at Template:Historic building, no longer seem to be needed. Mike Peel (talk) 22:02, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Unused templates should not be hidden away in project pages. Gonnym (talk) 09:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:41, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
A navbov exists for Rick Perry, Template:Rick Perry. We don't need a sidebar for every politician or political leader. The navbox is much better to navigate for articles about the subject matter. If it needs work, then it can fixed. We shouldn't create sidebars just to supplement a navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:21, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nominator, not everyone needs a sidebar. This is covered in the relevant navboxes and just clutters the article --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:30, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Οἶδα (talk) 04:27, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 06:04, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:42, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Same issue as was discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 March 22#Template:PitchforkVideo and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 60#Template:PitchforkDecade, etc. Any website/publication/critic can create year-end lists and distinctions like these. Creating a template for every such distinction is undue per WP:NAVBOX. This is not a significant award with its own Wikipedia article. It is merely a distinction conferred by a publication, the likes of which are innumerable. Navboxes are not intended for routine editorial content like this. Οἶδα (talk) 20:08, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Following my read on the nominator's side, as well as looking into past discussions, I agree that navboxes referring to the accolades of a person or work can quickly spiral out of control and unnecessary for a page, considering how many publication companies and organizations are out there. — Alex26337 (talk) 20:23, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:43, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Unneeded sidebar. We don't need a sidebar for every world leader or politician. Only seven links are of relevance to the subject matter. Such a small grouping of links for the subject and for a sidebar. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:41, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nominator, not everyone needs a sidebar. This is covered in the relevant navboxes and just clutters the articles. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Οἶδα (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 06:05, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:44, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
There are only six articles in the subject's main category. There are 5 links to article sections and another five to articles. We don't need a sidebar for every world leader. Such a small grouping of links for the subject and for a sidebar. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:32, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nominator, not everyone needs a sidebar. This is covered in the relevant navboxes and just clutters the articles. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Οἶδα (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 06:05, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:46, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Mostly links to article sections, mostly to Time Kaine's article. We already have a navbox for the subject, Template:Tim Kaine. We don't need a sidebar for every world leader or politician. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nominator, not everyone needs a sidebar. This is covered in the relevant navboxes and just clutters the articles. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Οἶδα (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 06:05, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:16, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Only 5 articles of relevance are linked. The rest are links to article sections and some redirects to O'Malley's own article. We don't need a sidebar for every political leader or politician. If you took articles from O'Malley's category, you will have links to mostly election articles where he was a candidate. Not a good use of a sidebar. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nominator, not everyone needs a sidebar. This is covered in the relevant navboxes and just clutters the articles. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Οἶδα (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator, as this sidebar does not offer enough supplementary information about O'Malley. — Alex26337 (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 06:05, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:17, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
After removing unrelated articles linked in the sidebar. We are left with 3 links to article sections and 4 articles to any relevance to the subject matter. Just another sidebar that adds clutter as there are too few links to justify a sidebar. We don't need a sidebar for every politician or political leader. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nominator, not everyone needs a sidebar. This is covered in the relevant navboxes and just clutters the articles. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Οἶδα (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nominatior; clearly there is not enough information to defy the need for this sidebar. — Alex26337 (talk) 20:16, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 06:06, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Vast majority of this sidebar leads to article sections. Only seven articles of relevance are linked to the subject of Harold Washington. Not every political leader needs a sidebar. There aren't enough articles for there to be a sidebar let alone any template for this subject. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nominator, not everyone needs a sidebar. This is covered in the relevant navboxes and just clutters the articles. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Οἶδα (talk) 20:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 06:06, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox state highway system Kentucky RS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Hard coded instance of Template:Infobox state highway system for one state. Maryland has the same setup with multiple pages for their roads (see for example: List of former Maryland state highways (400–499)) but no hardcoded instance of the template. Same situation in Louisiana. I see no reason for one state to have its own instance of this box. Substitute and delete. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 09:38, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Kill em all and let AARoads wiki sort it out. --NE2 17:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The functionality of this template has now been replicated in {{death date and age}}. Thus there is no longer a need for this template. It is my suggestion that this template be redirected to {{death date and age}} thus reducing the number of date templates that must be maintained. A side by side comparison of the two templates can be found here with various testcases. (Please feel free to add more testcases!) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 21:15, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC) - @Jonesey95, Gonnym, and Frietjes: any thoughts? Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- MOS:DATE allows for the abbreviation of months, which can be a boon in some infoboxes (where these templates are used). Unless I'm missing something, while {{death date and age text}} allows for this (e.g.
{{death date and age text|3 Oct 2025|1809-02-12}}), {{death date and age}} does not. As such, I would oppose redirecting or changing the template. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 13:49, 3 October 2025 (UTC)- @Fourthords: you are partially corrrect, see below:
{{death date and age|3 Oct 2025|5 Dec 1990}}→ October 3, 2025 (aged 34){{death date and age|1990-02-12|1980-03-12}}→ February 12, 1990 (aged 9)
- Basically {{death date and age}} overrides
OctwithOctober. It still works just fine! It just overrides the display value. Thank you for pointing this out. It should be a very easy fix. I'll put that on my todo list for this afternoon as regardless of this merge, that should not be the case. - That being said, given that it works (and that I will fix it so that the abbreviation doesn't get changed) what are your thoughts on merging? --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:14, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Fourthords: you are partially corrrect, see below:
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 08:47, 23 October 2025 (UTC) - @Zackmann08: It's probably not a good idea to relist discussions you're involved in. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Pppery I felt that since there had been very little traffic on this discussion there was no harm in relisting it. To be clear, I would absolutely never have closed a discussion I was involved in... But moving forward I will avoid relisting discussions I have been involved in as well. Appreciate the advice.
Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:35, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Pppery I felt that since there had been very little traffic on this discussion there was no harm in relisting it. To be clear, I would absolutely never have closed a discussion I was involved in... But moving forward I will avoid relisting discussions I have been involved in as well. Appreciate the advice.
- redirect pending changes which will preserve DMY or MDY in the input (per MOS:DATE), if this is not possible, then don't redirect. Frietjes (talk) 20:54, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2025 November 10. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Template:Diplomatic missions in Seychelles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Diplomatic missions in the Dominican Republic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Diplomatic missions in the Central African Republic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Only 1 English entry. Not useful for navigation. LibStar (talk) 00:57, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - not useful. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 06:06, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Οἶδα (talk) 19:59, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.