Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Oklahoma

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Oklahoma. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Oklahoma|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Oklahoma. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to US.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Oklahoma/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Oklahoma

Peter G. Engelman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject was not notable as an accountant. None of his writings are sufficiently noteworthy to meet the requirements of Wikipedia:AUTHOR. WWGB (talk) 06:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Judaism. WWGB (talk) 06:53, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: England, Maryland, and Oklahoma. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - while no doubt a mensch who was good to his mother, he was a run of the mill accountant, one of hundreds in Maryland alone. There is not the significant coverage we require. Bearian (talk) 20:54, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kylie Page

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability demonstrated. The only coverage I can find on this actress is the news of her death, presumably because journalists thought a porn actress dying young would be good clickbait. Notability should be sustained in time; it cannot be based on a single event. JohnMizuki (talk) 21:35, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Oklahoma. Shellwood (talk) 21:48, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 21:50, 3 July 2025 (UTC) [reply]

Kylie Page is most definitely a noteworthy name in the world of pornography, notwithstanding the lack of coverage that the whole business gets from mainstream publications (except when there's a tragic death). Maintain. JimboB (talk) 03:26, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Just correcting my stance, already explained above, using the required term. JimboB (talk) 02:48, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The media loves the “oh look, another deceased pornstar” angle. Even with Emily Willis who is technically still alive. What happened to Page is terrible; outside of the tragedy of it all, within these reliable sources who only decided to come around when she died are things the article actually needs and recollections of her successful stint in the adult industry and her appearance in the Netflix series where she began her career. I say don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. Let semi-competent editors fix the article up to what the standard is instead of the overzealous fans who are trying to throw crap at the wall to see what sticks. Trillfendi (talk) 03:45, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, why you're so bad and worst, i told you that's peoples' fault making adult web refs, not me, so remove all porn🔞 webs on this article now! Lui Editor (talk) 04:23, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not here to point fingers. Trillfendi (talk) 04:35, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is no rule that coverage should be before death. She was notbale before death, she had prestigious nominations. BilboBeggins (talk) 12:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm inclined to vote Keep on this one, there's significant coverage related to her career and of course death. Thief-River-Faller (talk) 16:50, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails GNG. Knox490 (talk) 04:51, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While she does not seem to be a megastar of her profession, being nominated for industry awards should be enough to warrant notability.--DasallmächtigeJ (talk) 10:58, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose, but there are awards and there are awards. "Spank Bank Slutty Stepsister / Stepdaughter of the Year" is not the Pulitzer Prize, and seems awfully specific. The Oscars do not have "Best supporting performance as a glazier" or whatever. And Spank Bank, whatever that is, does not even have an article here, so I wouldn't think that being nominated for (not even winning) their "Best Smile" award etc. would be all that impressive. Herostratus (talk) 01:33, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Award-nominated porn actress. There should be sufficient coverage from mainstream publications and other reliable sources to establish this as a WP:GNG-compliant biography. -- SethAllen623 (talk) 22:51, July 5, 2025 (UTC).

Oklahoma Proposed deletions

Current (use {{prodded}})