User talk:CatRacer22/Archive 5#Precious

This is an archive of past discussions with User:CatRacer22. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, CatRacer22. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for 2006 Subway 500 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with FA and all the best, Miniapolis 22:17, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2010 Korean Grand Prix you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Michael,

Thank you for your review at the Sci-Fi Dine-In Theater Restaurant FAC; the FAC was successful and the article is scheduled for a main page slot later this month. Might you be willing to participate in my current FAC? It is for the Frank Jenner article. Any constructive comments you might contribute to the discussion would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 15:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

• I will look at the article tomorrow and leave comments at the FAC page David. Z105space (talk) 17:49, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you for another helpful review, Michael! My new FAC is for the Kids Can Say No! article. Might you have time to review this article as well? Neelix (talk) 18:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
    • I heard about this film during the trial of Rolf Harris. I will look into the article when I can do so. Congratulations on getting Frank Jenner to FA! Z105space (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

The article 2010 Korean Grand Prix you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2010 Korean Grand Prix for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your kind words about my Quality improvement efforts to Wikipedia, in your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise.

A couple updates:

1. The discussion closed as Keep.

2. The Wikipedia article The Last Voyage of the Starship Enterprise is now rated Good Article quality.

Thanks again ever so much for acknowledging my efforts to improve the Quality of articles on Wikipedia in this manner.

— Cirt (talk) 03:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

• @Cirt: Thank you! Hope the article will be at FAC in the future! That kitten looks so cute! Z105space (talk) 07:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes, I hope so too. If you wish, you can watchlist the article and I'll update my progress on the article talk page. The next step is I've requested a copy-edit from the kind people at the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. — Cirt (talk) 07:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of 2010 Singapore Grand Prix at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chevvin (talk) 03:08, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello: The copy edit you requested by the Guild of Copy Editors of the article 2010 Singapore Grand Prix has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Z105space: You will have perhaps noticed that I archived the first citation in your article 2010 Singapore Grand Prix. I notice that some of the other citations have also been archived. I would strongly suggest that you archive the rest as time allows. That ensures your article's references are available "forever". In case you don't know, the site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the url in your citation and paste it in the box on the archive.org site and click save. It creates a copy of the original page, and provides you with a new url to add to your original citation. If you look at the url I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new url to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl= http etc|archivedate=6 Novemeber 2015}} Not all websites allow archiving - CBS TV news and the NY Times are two I've come across, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use. Cheers. Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Yes. I intended to archive the remaining links after the copy-edit was completed. Thank you for your work. Z105space (talk) 05:30, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2015_NASCAR_Sprint_Cup_Series#Broadcast_networks_tables. Thanks. – Nascar1996 ^{(talk • cont)} 01:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2010 Singapore Grand Prix you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 23:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

The article 2010 Singapore Grand Prix you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2010 Singapore Grand Prix for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Bentvfan54321 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Also, the Ferrari boys just dropped their first single. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 17:32, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

@Bentvfan54321: Thank you very much for your kind wishes! Let's hope the success of NASCAR's WikiProject and WikiProject Formula One continues into 2016! :) Z105space (talk) 19:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Kimi the Iceman, was a cold and relaxed soul, with his blue-ish eyes and his SF15, and "guys leave me alone". Kimi the Iceman, is a fairytale, they say. He was made of ice, but the Tifosi all know when he came to life one day. There must have been some magic in that four-time champ they found, for when they signed him to the team, he began to dance around! Zappa24Mati 19:10, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, CatRacer22. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for 2008 UAW-Dodge 400 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 05:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2000 Spanish Grand Prix you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Z105space. I notice you've been adding archiveurls to some of the dead links I have tagged recently. FYI, there's a bot (Cyberbot II) which should do that automatically (and as a bonus, archive any links on the page which haven't already been archived). Having said that, I'm not sure how long it will take the bot to get around to doing them (of the 100-or-so articles I've tagged in the past few days, I think it has only fixed 5 so far) and it sometimes uses date formats which are inconsistent with the other links in the article. So, you're welcome to keep adding archiveurls (in fact, once I've finished tagging all the Formula One race report articles, I'll probably go back and add a few myself), but the bot should do them eventually if there's other stuff you'd rather do. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 12:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

The article 2000 Spanish Grand Prix you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2000 Spanish Grand Prix for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

The article 2000 Spanish Grand Prix you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2000 Spanish Grand Prix for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:01, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2007 Coca-Cola 600 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

The article 2007 Coca-Cola 600 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2007 Coca-Cola 600 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 00:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

The article 2007 Coca-Cola 600 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2007 Coca-Cola 600 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove any further NASCAR sponsors as being non-notable. Given your knowledge of auto racing, I'm surprised you have taken this action, as NASCAR drivers are highly identified with their sponsors. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

@78.26: The consensus that I am aware of is that sponsors are not to be included in NASCAR race reports/season articles but I was unsure of sponsors mentioned in driver articles. Z105space (talk) 15:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

That makes sense. Can you point me to where consensus was reached? WikiProject NASCAR? All the best, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:23, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Here is the link for the consensus for season articles. – [1] Z105space (talk) 15:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Wonderful, and many thanks. I think a good point is made regarding the number of sponsors modern NASCAR drivers have to juggle, and I agree that a litany of one-off sponsorships is probably not the best for the encyclopedia. How about I take a look at the changes you made to driver articles, and I restore anything I think is important to a driver's career. If you don't agree with anything I've restored, feel free to talk to me (or the community, of course) about it. Thanks for your time and understanding. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:45, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do review my changes to driver articles. Z105space (talk) 16:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Z105space, I'll get to work on this summary for TFA tomorrow. Let me know what you think. - Dank (push to talk) 03:47, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

@Dank:: TFA looks fine, Dan. Z105space (talk) 11:00, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

I intentionally wasn't going to review until someone else stepped forward and did so because I wanted to see if the inevitable would happen, which is, of course, the fact that not a single editor stepped forward to review. Of course, we can't put the blame on any particular person or group of people, but in my opinion, to have an article go over a month without attracting a single review is unacceptable. We need to find a way to get our fellow editors from the motorsports WikiProjects to review, or something. You and I have always been good about QPQ, but we need to get others involved. You have my sympathy. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Katie^talk 15:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, CatRacer22. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for 2007 Coca-Cola 600 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Please note that clarification of facts is not part of GOCE's stated remit. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I just promoted this to Template:Did you know/Preparation area 1. It is due to be shown on the Main Page on 11 February (7am - 7pm eastern time). Is there any chance of Casey Mears winning in the Nextel Cup Series between now and then? If so, the phrase "as of 2016" can be removed, as it will be up to date at the time of posting. Regards, Jolly Ω Janner 23:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

@Jolly Janner: The regular NASCAR season does not begin until 21 February, so the answer is no. Z105space (talk) 06:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. It has been amended. Jolly Ω Janner 06:22, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

On 11 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2007 Coca-Cola 600, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Casey Mears' victory in the 2007 Coca-Cola 600 is his first and only win in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2007 Coca-Cola 600. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Welcome aboard! Feel free to help build the missing articles list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Wales/Awaken the Dragon/Missing article hotlist and Wikipedia:WikiProject Wales/Awaken the Dragon/Missing articles. The hotlist is intended to be more important articles but use your judgement. Feel free to add villages from Vale of Glamorgan (the ones I haven't started yet ;-) ) and Bridgend etc or anything else missing.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

NASCAR racing

Thank you quality articles on NASCAR racing and related people, such as 2012 Budweiser Shootout, 2007 Coca-Cola 600 and Paolo Gislimberti, for a clear presentation of your user and achievements, including an infobox, for being "proud to be a Wikipedian", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

• @Gerda Arendt: Thank you so much for giving me this award. :) Z105space (talk) 09:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2008 UAW-Dodge 400 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 19:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Z105space, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! — Earwig ^talk 02:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)