Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machine Perception and Cognitive Robotics Laboratory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Machine Perception and Cognitive Robotics Laboratory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not merit its own article, unreliable sources. JMHamo (talk) 22:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  23:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  23:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  23:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete perhaps as although I found some links at News and browser, there's nothing convincingly better. Notifying DGG who lists to be notified of these subject AfDs. SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A laboratory within a research unit of a medium level research university. I don't think even the research unit of which it is a part, Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences is notable, and Ive listed it for deletion.. Not even one of its faculty have articles in Wikipedia. Researchers can become notable because of the citations to the papers they publish without anything else being shown, but this does not extend to departments and laboratories. In practice, since only the famous ones get writtten about, the effective standard of notability for such organizations has generally been famous. This is nowhere near. It would be inappropriate oeven redirect. This is too minor. DGG ( talk ) 06:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.