User talk:Historyexpert2

Hello, Historyexpert2!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Doug Weller talk 14:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Historyexpert2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Benoy (teip), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I really think there is an argument for deleting the whole deaths from cancer tree. In almost no cases are these people defined by the cause of death. Some of them had been out of public view for a long time when they died. I really have no particular love for the cancer specially categories. I will just warn you that since deaths from protate cancer in California is no particular more or less defining that deaths from stomach cancer in California or deaths from Prostate cancer in Arizona, I do not know this one Category nomination will succeed. Although I think things would be helped if people would consider categories on their lobe merits. The number of deaths from cancer categories Amis truly mind blowing, with many of them being very large in size. With cancer being second only to heart disease as a cause of death I really think we should delete the whole tree. I used to think we could get the by type sub-categories, but have since realized that rarely works. We really need to cut out some of these non-defining categories. While cancer has a huge impact on individuals, it is not a core defing thing to them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:21, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this will feel helpful rather than otherwise, but this is a useful gadget that lets you hover over someone's username to see multiple things about them, like how much experience they have, what permissions they have, etc. It's not perfect but it's useful for a rule of thumb for making your best guess as to whether, for instance, you probably need to be asking questions instead of quoting basic policy at someone. Best to you! Valereee (talk) 20:13, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have brought our discussion about the use of UnHerd as a source for attributed statements to WP:3O. benǝʇᴉɯ 12:19, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]