Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 July 8#Template:Latest preview software release/iOS

• Template:Years in Pennsylvania (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with no transclusions, no main article, and only three blue links in the body. Created in December 2024. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:46, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We could add a the navbox inside articles like 1776 in Pennsylvania and 2023 in Pennsylvania to prevent it from completely unused. 2600:1700:6180:6290:6F05:203E:BE0A:FD76 (talk) 23:06, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, we have many like this one here: Category:Templates by year (Template:Years in Colorado for example). I don't see why we should delete this one specifically. I'd suggest adding the navbox in the years that are blue and if you do really want to delete this, propose a mass deletion of all "years in" templates without many blue links. GalStar (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have now created the main article as well as added a few transclusions. GalStar (talk) (contribs) 02:19, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:12, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Brought into use. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 06:44, 11 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• Template:San Diego Blue Line Platform Layout (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:San Diego Green Line Platform Layout (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:San Diego Orange Line Platform Layout (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused platform layout templates. Gonnym (talk) 15:57, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support as creator. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:SacRT Platform Layout Blue Line island (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SacRT Platform Layout Blue Line side (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SacRT Platform Layout Blue Line/next (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SacRT Platform Layout Gold Line side (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SacRT Platform Layout Blue Line/previous (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SacRT Platform Layout Gold Line side freight (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SacRT Platform Layout Gold Line/next (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:SacRT Platform Layout Gold Line/previous (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused platform layout templates. Gonnym (talk) 15:55, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support as creator. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Party shading/United (NZ) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused color template. Gonnym (talk) 15:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Party shading/NZL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused color template. Gonnym (talk) 15:54, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:MM Line 9 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not used on any mainspace article related to railway/metro stations.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 11:26, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It will used later on Future upcoming metro/railway stations which are going on under construction to completion of this route. Feroze Ahmad 2 (talk) 19:33, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Now in use. Useddenim (talk) 20:38, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Gonnym (talk) 08:16, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Isonokami Faith (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There seems to be no Isonokami Faith The Banner talk 14:58, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is unknown which kami were worshipped in the early days at Isonokami but you will find plenty of discussion of Isonokami worship in the literature. It is placed in contrast to Yamoto rule, which seems to have increasingly depended on it. Futsunomitama, the personification of a divine sword, is enshrined in the Isonokami. It still counts as Shinto as far as I know (which isn't very far) but it does seem to be a thing of it's own. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 17:59, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

The Japanese word is shinkō which means faith or belief. If you look around the wiki you will find plenty of entities described as Foo Faith (although probably they'd be better with a small f). I think it's worth taking to some Shinto specialists. WikiProject Shinto is thataway, All the best: Rich Farmbrough 18:07, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I do not think this is a valid reason for deletion. For any notional religious XYZ in Japan (which according to my World Atlas of Religion has the highest "Religious adherence" in the world, at around 140%) you could reasonably say "There is no XYZ faith", because it really is not faith in the western Judaeo-Christian tradition, it is just "doing stuff" at various historical sites. So unless (as RF says above) a genuine expert says "This really is not a coherent assemblage of entities", the template should stay. Imaginatorium (talk) 08:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do strongly question the existence of this template, or at least the name. As far as I can tell, the Shinto practiced at Isonokami Shrine is Shrine Shinto. Shrine Shinto isn't really divided until further categories because, as Imaginatorium says, it's a collection of customs practiced at the various shrines. Each shrine will do things their way anyway, but it's still one big "faith" because it's not like people only worship or believe in the kami at that one shrine, but if we called each one something different we'd have thousands, close to ten thousand different "religions". People might pray at Isonokami hoping for whatever help those kami specifically provide, then pray somewhere else for the exact same reason. Calling it "Isonokami Faith" to me implies it's something seperate with its own doctrine (there are some Shinto branches and schools with actual doctrines both historically and in modern times) and I don't believe that's necessarily the case here. I also can't find anything that treats the form of Shinto practiced at Isonokami as something seperate from Shinto (and when you say "Shinto" in modern times you generally mean Shrine Shinto).

It's possible that historically there was a type of Shinto worth calling Isonokami Shinto or something, but I haven't found anything that supports that.

So anyway, because I feel the name of "Isonokami Faith" implies something that is not true, I support renaming at the very least. Maybe just to "Isonokami Shrine" or "Shinto at Isonokami Shrine". Erynamrod (talk) 17:26, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:MRT station/Chaloem Ratchamongkhon Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused line table. If used should be placed directly and not in a template. Gonnym (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:List of philosophers TOC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused ToC template as pages were redirected. Gonnym (talk) 15:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Latest stable software release/gnuplot (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Latest stable software release/DigiLocker (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Latest preview software release/iPadOS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: that's now done by setting the "latest preview release" parameter in the infobox in iPadOS to directly reference the two LPR templates for iPadOS 18 and iPadOS 26. Guy Harris (talk) 21:11, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:05, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Latest preview software release/iOS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: that's now done by setting the "latest preview release" parameter in the infobox in iOS to directly reference the two LPR templates for iOS 18 and iOS 26. Guy Harris (talk) 21:10, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:05, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Latest preview software release/WhatsApp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Latest preview software release/LibreOffice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Latest preview software release/Jami (software) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 15:49, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:LG Twins roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as replaced (incorrectly) with a navbox with this edit. Gonnym (talk) 15:47, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Jammu Tawi – Srinagar VB Express Route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 15:46, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Inter-county hurlers category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused category template. Gonnym (talk) 15:46, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Inter-county Gaelic footballers category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused category template. Gonnym (talk) 15:46, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Index of logic articles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused header (?) template. Gonnym (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox Chinese/Manchu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 15:45, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Infobox French commune/notes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unneeded subpage from 2009. Gonnym (talk) 15:44, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep of historical interest. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:27, 8 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  
• Delete We don't keep templates for "historical interest", that's just not done here. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:43, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  It's not a template. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 08:02, 10 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  It also has no historical significance. Gonnym (talk) 08:17, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  

• Template:Gridiron alt secondary color raw (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused color template. Gonnym (talk) 15:43, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think you need to look at Module:Gridiron color and understand the "raw" parameter, or ask User:Dissident93, before considering this. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 17:05, 8 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• Delete. If it hasn't been used 1.5 years after its creation, it is presumably not needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:27, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:European Parliament standings (9th) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused political party table. Gonnym (talk) 15:41, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Ethiopia squad 2012 African Women's Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navigation template with only red likns. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. GiantSnowman 18:31, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no blue links, and unlikely these will get created soon, or are notable enough people. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:13, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Festival of red links. Svartner (talk) 01:47, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Electorates of the Australian House of Representatives interactive map frame (2022) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused image template. Gonnym (talk) 15:39, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No transclusions from articles in mainspace. TarnishedPath^talk 08:39, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Dk-Fælleslisten-light (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused color template. Gonnym (talk) 15:37, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This is part of the colour system for elections. Removing it would potently cause mysterious errors in the future. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  How can an unused template cause errors in the future? Either use it, or don't, but if it isn't used, it has no reason to be kept. Gonnym (talk) 08:19, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  

• Template:Daily Wire hosts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as Template:The Daily Wire is used instead. Gonnym (talk) 15:37, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:CSX River Subdivision (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route map. Gonnym (talk) 15:36, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Replaced by {{West Shore Railroad main line}} as part of the related article merge. No attribution required. Mackensen (talk) 16:01, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The West Shore RR main line template seems better, and also includes more info than this one, I see no problem in using only the West Shore one. Best, MTATransitFan^Chat! 16:34, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Bill Gates series/styles.css (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as the template was changed to use Template:Sidebar person. Gonnym (talk) 15:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Barauni–Gorakhpur, Raxaul and Jainagar lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route map. Gonnym (talk) 15:35, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The map is very confusing and can be separated into many parts to represent them with more informations. Abdullah1099 (talk) 09:55, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not used on any related article so far.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 11:28, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Restored to parent article. @Abdullah1099: before you go bashing other RDTs I suggest that you take a little more care with the ones you create. Useddenim (talk) 15:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I know but after creating some show blank template after filling them. Can you tell me how this all works. Please. Abdullah1099 (talk) 15:58, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Gonnym (talk) 08:19, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Avellino-Rocchetta Sant'Antonio railway line diagram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused route map. Gonnym (talk) 15:34, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify or Userfy: obviously created in anticipation of a future article. Useddenim (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/St Georges Terrace (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as removed by User:Elrondil. Gonnym (talk) 15:33, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/S10 road (Oman) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Gonnym (talk) 15:33, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/Rancho Drive (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Gonnym (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/Pénétrante de Tizi Ouzou (P15) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as Pénétrante de Tizi Ouzou does not exist. Gonnym (talk) 15:32, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/Lakeland Freeway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as Lakeland Freeway was turned into a redirect. Gonnym (talk) 15:31, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/Graham Farmer Freeway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as removed by User:Steelkamp. Gonnym (talk) 15:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/Desert Inn Road (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Gonnym (talk) 15:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. It's used at Desert Inn Road. I created it because no such KML file existed on Wikipedia before I made it. 27 is my favorite number. You can ask me why here. 16:41, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@27 is the best number it isn't used. You can check what links here to see nothing links or transcludes it. Notice that your edit here actually added Wikipedia:Map data/Wikipedia KML/Desert Inn Road which is completely different page. Gonnym (talk) 08:22, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/Cleveland Memorial Shoreway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as Cleveland Memorial Shoreway was turned into a redirect. Gonnym (talk) 15:29, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/Banna Avenue (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as Banna Avenue was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as article no longer exists and template is unused. Harryboyles 22:40, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/6 Hayes/Parnassus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as User:Transitmatt removed it. Gonnym (talk) 15:27, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: It's not yet clear whether the merger of this route with another will be permanent. If it turns out to be temporary, we'll need this again. I'm ambivalent whether keeping it for now, or just undeleting it if needed, is best. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:31, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Official SFMTA website says the 21 is suspended so yeah it sounds good to keep. Transitmatt (talk) 04:41, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Attached KML/A1144 road (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Attached KML/A1156 road (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Attached KML/A2100 road (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Attached KML/A4005 road (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Attached KML/A6079 road (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as articles were converted to redirects. Gonnym (talk) 15:24, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Antonis Samaras sidebar/styles.css (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as the template was changed to use Template:Sidebar person. Gonnym (talk) 15:23, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:AHM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused calendar template. Gonnym (talk) 15:23, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2025 UCI WorldTeams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sports table template. Gonnym (talk) 15:20, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2025 Women's Cricket World Cup Qualifier (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as the table is used directly in 2025 Women's Cricket World Cup Qualifier. Gonnym (talk) 15:20, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2025 Asia Rugby Championship table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as the table is used directly in 2025 Asia Rugby Championship. Gonnym (talk) 15:19, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2025 All-Ireland Senior Football Championship Group 3 table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as the table is used directly in 2025 All-Ireland Senior Football Championship. Gonnym (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2024 Major League Soccer season results table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and empty table which isn't transcluded from the season article. Gonnym (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2024 IFL Western Conference standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. 2024 Indoor Football League season uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 15:14, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2025 MLS Next Pro Northeast Division table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Season article does not have it nor have a section for this. Gonnym (talk) 15:14, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This league has two conferences. Each conference has two divisions. I see no reason that the division tables should not be included in the relevant conference sections. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:44, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• Template:2024 MLS Next Pro Northeast Division table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Season article does not have it nor have a section for this. Gonnym (talk) 15:14, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2023 MLS Next Pro Central Division table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Season article does not have it nor have a section for this. Gonnym (talk) 15:14, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2022 MLS Next Pro Central Division table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Season article does not have it nor have a section for this. Gonnym (talk) 15:13, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2021–22 Primera División RFEF Group 1 table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2021–22 Primera División RFEF Group 2 table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as tables are located at 2021–22 Primera División RFEF. Gonnym (talk) 15:11, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. GiantSnowman 18:31, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2019–20 IV liga Subcarpathia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unclear what article this could be added to as there doesn't seem to be a season article. Gonnym (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently the league was founded in 2020, if I read aright. There is no data in the template, otherwise I'd suggest putting it in the IV liga Subcarpathia article. Maye it could be copied to the talk page, in case it comes in handy in the future. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:33, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. GiantSnowman 18:31, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no season article exists for 2019-20 season of IV liga Subcarpathia, so no valid target to place this. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:01, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:2014 Indian Super League points table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2015 Indian Super League points table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2016 Indian Super League points table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2017–18 Indian Super League points table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2018–19 Indian Super League points table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2019–20 Indian Super League points table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2020–21 Indian Super League points table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2021–22 Indian Super League points table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:2022–23 Indian Super League points table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused as all templates merged into their articles (2014 Indian Super League, etc.). Gonnym (talk) 15:06, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete In the unlikely event they become useful again they can be un-merged or undeleted. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:41, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  
  • Ensure any attribution is maintained All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:45, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]
    
• delete, they were unnecessarily split from the article and I subsequently reverted here. Frietjes (talk) 16:00, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. GiantSnowman 18:31, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not needed, created by split without consensus. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:10, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:R&F (Hong Kong) squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

According to R&F (Hong Kong), this football team no longer exists. A current squad template is no longer useful. Editors have progressively blanked this template instead of sending it to TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:50, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to article and delete All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:40, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  
  • Ensure any attribution is maintained All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:45, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]
    
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - defunct club has no 'current' squad, so does not need a 'current squad' template. Respectfully no idea what @Rich Farmbrough: is talking about, we absolutely would not merge to the parent article. GiantSnowman 18:31, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete defunct clubs don't have current squads. Nothing to merge, so just delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:11, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:Happy Valley AA squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

According to Happy Valley AA, this football team no longer exists. A current squad template is no longer useful. Editors have progressively blanked this template instead of sending it to TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to article and delete All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:40, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  
  • Ensure any attribution is maintained All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:45, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]
    
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - defunct club has no 'current' squad, so does not need a 'current squad' template. Respectfully no idea what @Rich Farmbrough: is talking about, we absolutely would not merge to the parent article. GiantSnowman 18:31, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @GiantSnowman: If it's up to date this is the last squad. That seems like the sort of information that should be included. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 23:39, 10 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  

  I've added a copy to the talk page. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 23:56, 10 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  No, we don't include 'final' squads for defunct clubs - and if we did, it would not be in this format. GiantSnowman 14:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  

  Did I say it would be in this format? All the best: Rich Farmbrough 19:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]
  

• Template:UNFCCC Party Groupings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template with poor documentation about what the groupings are The Banner talk 12:24, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: It's not any sort of poor documentation. What the groupings are, is - of course - written on the respective article page. And on every grouping's page. The templates contains links to the respective page: Every country / grouping name in the template is clickable! Here, more precise links than just Country will be introduced over time. Saippuakauppias ⇄ 15:15, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The Banner talk 21:18, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To what you disagree, Sir? All that you have asked for is now provided:

• Used in various articles
• The explanation is there. If you are not following UNFCCC negotiations, then it will be difficult to understand from looking at the diagram only. I recommend you to check the above mentioned article on UNFCCC parties, as well as the pages of the coallitions (ALBA, LMDC, etc.).

For any further info, please feel free to ask. If you want me to improve something, please provide constructive feedback, that is, not just two words.

• The diagram is widely used. I update it every few weeks, when changes occur.
• → Are you against the template, or agianst the diagram itself? If you're against the figure, you can also try to get the SVG removed from Commons, or remove it from the artcles. However, the Template provides the additional value over the figure of being clickable. So what is your problem with this? Do you prefer the figure not to be clickable? Then, this would simply be less userfriendly.
• Do you want more details written about the negotiations and the reason of the groups in the Doumentation page? This is not common practice. Check other Euler diagrams: e.g. Template:Supranational_African_Bodies, Template:Supranational_European_Bodies. I just used their Template as a template for creating the present one. There seems to be no issues. Saippuakauppias ⇄ 09:07, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a problem with quality of the template and the limited number of uses. The Banner talk 11:27, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Allright. Please answer my questions, because I have a problem with the quality of your messages. – You send no more than 11, 2, 15 words. This is not constructive.

• --> Specify quality. What do you refer to?
• --> How many transclusions do you want?
• --> It's simply an improvement of the figure, because it makes the figure clickable. So What is your problem?

Saippuakauppias ⇄ 14:49, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The template is NOT widely used, just a few times. The template is excessively big. And despite everything: links to disambiguation pages. Somebody else has fixed most of them, but still one is left. The Banner talk 03:17, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Provides an updateable way of keeping track of a complex situation in graphic format. Doubtless there is room for improvement, but WP:sofixit applies. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:39, 9 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  Thank you, please help improvig, by telling me on the SVG's talk page, if you see anything! Would you prefer fags instead of names? Saippuakauppias ⇄ 23:08, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]