• ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I formally request the Autopatrolled user right. I'm a regular user of Wikipedia, both in Turkish and English. I have contributed to the Turkish Wikipedia, particularly on the Tao-Klarjeti region. I have also started to transfer these contributions to the English Wikipedia. I think it would be good to reduce the workload involved in reviewing the items I have written. Thank you. --ႧႤႧႰႨ ႾႠႰႨ (talk) 15:32, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

• Aeternus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, have created numerous new articles, edited countless others, and am very familiar with its policies. Λeternus ^(talk) 12:46, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

• Michelangelo1992 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've periodically patrolled Michelangelo1992's articles, and consistently found them to be in good shape. Focused on books as a topic area and very clear familiarity with WP:NBOOK. He's created 135 articles. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

@Michelangelo1992: I'm a little concerned about overly lengthy quotations. Would you commit to summarizing quotations a bit more? Also, see MOS:SAID. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:24, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback! I’ve always trended toward direct quotes to avoid concerns for original research, but I can make an effort to paraphrase more in the future while still citing the original source. I’ll also try to be more mindful of WP:SAID. I thought I was doing fairly well with this, but I am always open to feedback particularly if you have specific suggestions relating to recent articles. Thank you! Michelangelo1992 (talk) 14:37, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

• BenTanXiaoMing (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Have been creating several new articles recently, and I understand the policies and guidelines behind articles. BenTanXiaoMing (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) As a new pages patroller I largely endorse this, their articles are well-categorized and well-referenced - only concern could be their shortest article Sembawang Hills Food Centre where many of the sources are very short and could be considered "not substantial coverage" (though SunDawn marked it as reviewed without any notes). -- Reconrabbit 16:57, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done, hmm, looks good to me, and I can see the rationale behind Sembawang Hills Food Centre since it has been mentioned in Michelin ratings, which is debatably a form of significant coverage. Sohom (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Bagwe Neza (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I request AutoWikiBrowser rights to generally help apply consistent templates and make efficient edits across many pages. I saw it on WP:JWB.

Thank you. Bagwe Neza (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:50, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Ecourter (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Currently working on CheckWiki edits and would like to try out this tool as it's one of the recommended tools to use. Ecourter (talk) 06:42, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 18:13, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Ddas (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I want to use this tool to correct grammar, fix Bare URLs, adding and improving references and apply consistent templates. I have been doing this using the standard web-based editor, which is more tedious, so this will bring productive efficiency to my work. ddas|edEn (talk) 14:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done But remember, accuracy is more important than speed - fixing bare URLs may not be easily automatable and give WP:AGCR a read. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:51, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Will229 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi! I would like to request access to AutoWikiBrowser (AWB) for my account User:Will229. I have been making manual edits such as fixing typos, improving references, formatting citations, and adding wikilinks to underlinked articles. I would like to use AWB to streamline these maintenance tasks, always reviewing each edit before saving. I understand and will follow all Wikipedia policies regarding the use of AWB. Thanks! Will229 (talk) 22:08, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:52, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Akaza (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am a long-time content creator, and work frequently with references and lists, which can get quite tedious at times. I would like to obtain AWB to streamline the process. ❆ AKAZA ❆ 23:09, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Equine-man (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I recently discovered this tool and it will remove a lot of the tedious, repetitive work I often do. Things like Syntax fixes, template fixes, MOS fixes, etc. Equine-man (talk) 21:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC) Equine-man (talk) 21:39, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

If you get access to AWB, please be careful to avoid creating problems like the batch of pages you created like User:Equine-man@Drafter/Sandbox/AutoDrafts/Veldenz Castle, now at this location. Those pages took a lot of work to clean up. Automated tools make it easy to create problems at a large scale, and you are still responsible for all edits you make, with or without the tool. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

 Not done per Jonesey95. I'm sorry, but I don't think it's appropriate to grant you AWB access so soon after that incident. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:54, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Cypp0847 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I request autowikibrowser rights in order to carry out large-scale edits on dozens of local constituencies in Hong Kong (which were abolished in 2023). Thank you. ~~ J. Dann 02:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:55, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Erisie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to have access to this tool in order to make quick find-and-replace changes across multiple articles. Erisie (talk) 17:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done But please use edit summaries for your edits - AWB makes this easier by having one place to provide an edit summary which is then automatically applied to each change. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:56, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Gnoeee (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'm requesting access to use JWB so that I can optimize and fix Infobox and templates. I have been using JWB with my bot account GnoeeeBot at mlwiki.- ❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ ✉ 17:25, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:56, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Eugenia ioessa (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi !
I would love to have access to AWB to better help with search and replace and to maintain templates on articles.
Thank you for the consideration !
Eugenia ioessa (talk) 19:46, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:57, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• WikiEditor451 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights WikiEditor451 (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Reason for declining request. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:09, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• KyleSirTalksAlot (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Given the articles I have created/contributed to on Wikipedia, I would like to have access to review new articles, and believe I could contribute to expanding the new articles, finding citations, fixing tone, etc. KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:30, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

• Pro-anti-air (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like New Page Reviewer rights to help review pages and redirects and reduce the backlog. I am familiar with Wikipedia policies. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 04:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:33, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

• Destinyokhiria (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia for the past years, during which I have created and edited serval articles in line with Wikipedia’s content policies and guidelines. I've been an AfC reviewer since May and have enjoyed the work. I'd like to help with new page reviewing as well. In the last year or so, I've been more interested in reviewing and editing and have participated in many AfD discussions and done various cleanup tasks in addition to the AfC reviewing. I'm committed to using the tools responsibly, Thank you for considering my request. Destinyokhiria 💬 22:57, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:36, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

• Acrom12 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I’ve already created a few articles and I often check new pages for sourcing, notability, and overall quality. I also help out in AfD discussions when I can, mostly to look at whether topics meet notability and if the sources are solid. I enjoy helping new editors fix their pages and guiding them on what needs improvement. Since I’m already active in this area, I’d like to take a more direct role in keeping the new pages feed clean and helping page creators understand the basics. Becoming a reviewer would let me contribute more effectively. Thanks for considering my request! Acrom12 (talk) 11:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot ^talk 12:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

• Aplucas0703 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello to the reviewer! I've noticed the large backlog and would like to help make some progress with patrolling pages, mainly redirects. I have some previous experience in the article for creation space, creating my own articles, and creating my own redirects. I try to help new incoming editors, including mentoring my current partner and teaching them how to use the features of Wikipedia. I'm capable of catching content that probably shouldn't belong on Wikipedia, but also helping new users expand draft articles.

I participate in AfD, though my suggestions are often rejected; I consider this a skill that I am still learning. It's worth noting that I have never misused speedy deletion or other non-discussion deletion methods; my usage of these has been successful when I have applied them. Even still, my knowledge of AfC and redirects provides me with a good basis to use this right.

Thank you, and please ask any questions you may have. aaronneallucas (talk) 05:12, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• MichealKal (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello. I would like to request the New Page Reviewer right. I have experience creating and improving articles, working with reliable sources, and applying core content policies such as WP:N, WP:V, and WP:NPOV. I have also been involved in discussions about pages for deletion, which has strengthened my understanding of notability and content standards.

I would like to help reduce the backlog by reviewing new pages more effectively with the proper tools. I am familiar with COI issues and notability guidelines across multiple topic areas, and I’m happy to start with a trial if needed.

Thank you for your consideration. MichealKal (talk) 08:18, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done, till the end of Jan! Sohom (talk) 16:27, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Salihu Aliyu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello. I would like to request New Page Reviewer right. I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time and have gained experience in creating, improving, and maintaining articles across different topics. Over time, I have developed a solid understanding of core Wikipedia policies, including notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), and the use of reliable sources (WP:RS).

I would like to help reduce the New Pages Patrol backlog by reviewing new articles carefully, identifying issues early, and supporting new editors with constructive feedback where needed. I believe I can make a positive contribution to the NPR team. Thank you for your time! S Ahmad Fulani 15:49, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

 Not done, I see AI usage in one of your latest article creation, for example, 2025 Katsina mosque attack says The attack highlights the continuing insecurity in northwestern Nigeria, where armed groups frequently raid villages, abduct residents, and target places of worship. which is a hallmark of unreviewed AI-usage in writing. Even in this request, you talk about core Wikipedia policies, including notability, verifiability and use of reliable sources which is (imo) another writing peculiarity of AI usage. The fact that you do not disclose this usage and or at very least refrain from using them in communications with other editors as required by our WP:LLMTALK tells me that you are not there yet in terms of being able to review other folks articles for policy violations. Sohom (talk) 16:19, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Squawk7700 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hey! I got my trial NPR rights a month ago and really enjoyed my time so far. I am still learning the ropes, and the start wasn't easy, but I hope that I'm slowly getting there. Unfortunately, I've been quite busy due to a few real-life matters that needed my full attention and have therefore not been able to do too extensive reviewing, but I'd like to help where I can, and I've really enjoyed it during the few times when I was able to look into some articles.

Thank you for considering. Squawk7700 (talk) 00:32, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Extraordinary Writ (expires 00:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 00:40, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done I see no issues here. CoconutOctopus talk 14:30, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• ScrabbleTiles (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi there! I’m requesting page mover rights because, while patrolling new pages, I sometimes come across pages that need to be draftified and when I do so, unnecessary redirects are left behind. I’ve also encountered cases where a new page has a typo in its title and when I move it to the correct name, I have to leave a redirect behind. I have occasionally contributed to requested moves, though not very frequently. Thanks, ScrabbleTiles (talk) 08:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 18:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• IAmChaos (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I am an AFC reviewer, and recently going through a lot of pages that move from userspace to draftspace, using the tool on Template:AfC submission. This makes me the creator of future sandboxes, which I have then noticed developing into pages I am uninvolved with.So I would like to request for redirect suppression. Also, as a gnome, I would be more than willing to help out at WP:RM, which at the moment has over a dozen requests in the uncontroversial section, as well as a backlog of elapsed listings going back over a month. You can see some of my Gnome work in redirect requests (for which I am psuedo-autopatrolled, which is also a good reason for me to suppress redirects), AFC listings, NPR (mostly redirects, but it would be nice to suppress redirects on draftifications, although I dont do that much anymore), and some recent changes patrolling. There have also been a few times I wanted to create redirects as an AFC/R patroller, but was blocked by the blacklist. I've read the policies on page moving, and would continue to refer back to them as I learn the rest of what goes on at RM, until I understand them all. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 05:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

One of the reasons you mentioned requesting page mover for was suppressing redirects for moves from userspace to draftspace. Theoretically, if you had the rights to do that, which redirect suppression criteria would you use in your edit summary? Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

I would say G6. Deleting pages unambiguously created [...] in the incorrect namespace, or redirects created by moving away from a title that was obviously unintended. The default edit summary for moves given to AFC reviewers in the template is that submissions should be created in draftspace, so it would seem to me that the correct namespace is Draft, and fixing the namespace is uncontroversial cleanup. I would also commit to only suppress on generic sandbox pages, not on subpages with specific titles, that way individual users could be the creators of their pages, and not have notices sent to me in the future, which I have seen happen to others. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 18:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

 Comment: I am striking part of my request and my previous comment after I found {{Draftified userpage}} It makes sense to me why we would keep such pages, especially for new users. If a patrolling admin thinks that with that struck, I don't have enough reason for the role, I will gladly withdraw my application. However, I am still willing to gnome in WP:RM/TR, and WP:RM if you would let me. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 05:11, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

 Request withdrawn per above & I don't want to split attention too much. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 03:06, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• LuniZunie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

• Erin1973 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello all. I’d like to be a pending changes reviewer to help keep articles accurate and reliable. I’m interested in taking on more responsibility and expanding my experience and role on Wikipedia. Thank you! Erin1973 (talk) 17:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:03, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Theeverywhereperson (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to become a pending changes reviewer because I think I could help quite a lot in the process of reviewing pending revision changes. I am notably experienced (450+ edits in mainspace, 1200 edits total) and do not have any COI with any article. I also think I should become a pending changes reviewer because I would really like to contribute to the community in more ways, as I am very much involved in the fight against vandalism by my efforts as a recent changes patroller. I am familiar with the policies of Wikipedia and have not had any edit wars or the sort (excluding warnings) with anyone in a considerably long time. I also do not have any biases to any pages, only adding information by collecting references from other sources. Thank you! Theeverywhereperson (talk here) 09:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot ^talk 09:10, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

Request was withdrawn, not declined (bot comment is incorrect) Theeverywhereperson (talk here) 15:32, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: just a note to say this comment is incorrect Theeverywhereperson (talk here) 15:49, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:03, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Legendbird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello! I have done some anti-vandalism work, but feel like I could take on some more responsibility. Would it be possible to get Pending Changes Reviewing permission? Thank you in advance, for your answer! Legendbird (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Sorry, I don't think you have enough experience to qualify for advanced permissions right now. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:03, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Nikunj12387 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Nikunj12387 (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2025 (UTC) Reasons:

• Kajjul (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting rollback rights

I have been recent-changes patroller for a long time on and off, also am a proud twinkle user. I kind of did not realise I didn't have this right, gaining the sacred right would make my counter-vandalism work much easier. Thanks for reading this :) Kajjul (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Too little recent changes patrolling activity in history. And user rights aren't sacred, they're merely positions of trust. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:05, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Gurkubondinn (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'm mostly a WP:GNOME, am active on WP:AIC and spend a fair amount of time finding and reverting various WP:VANDALisms, mostly using Twinkle but I would like to try using Huggle (which requires rollback). I generally use the standard warning templates to notify editors of my reverts, but sometimes I leave messages with more detailed explanations or asking them to WP:LLMDISCLOSE. My request for PCR permissions includes a bit more on what I'd been doing on Wikipedia. --Gurkubondinn _(talk) 12:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Shubhsamant09 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I’ve been patrolling recent changes consistently and have handled a substantial amount of vandalism. I also pending changes reviewing rights. Gaining rollback rights would allow me to respond more quickly and effectively, especially during spikes in vandalism, and would support the work I’m already doing. Shubhsamant09 (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

• Pyrrhic victor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been handling vandalism for quite a while now, I have a chunk more than 1000 edit's the majority of which are dealing in vandalisum(the rest of witch are other simmalar activitys). I mainly use Ultraviolet and ocasionally twinkle but would like to try to use the tools that require rollback. Pyrrhic victor (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot ^talk 15:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

• Babysharkboss2 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am requesting rollback after willingly giving up Twinkle, and more recently being suggested I request rollback. I believe Rollback would be beneficial to my patrolling of recent edits. Babysharkb☩ss2 I am Thou, Thou art I 14:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

• PCHS Pirate Alumnus (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Useful for doing RC patrol; usually Twinkle is sufficient but sometimes would be easier to just use rollback. PCHS Pirate Alumnus (talk) 21:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Mdm.Bla (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been patrolling recent changes for a while. I currently use Ultraviolet when patrolling recent changes, but would like to try AntiVandal to expand my toolbox, which requires rollback. I use the standard warning templates with Ultraviolet, although I do have a set of "uw-0" style messages that I use occasionally. mdm.bla 03:21, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

• Seanwk (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been RC patrolling for over two months now. Clicking individual diff links to revert edits is very inefficient and unnecessary, and I believe having rollback could fix this. I've made over 200 edits to mainspace and have no history of edit warring. Seanwk :) ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:42, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4][5]). — MusikBot ^talk 02:50, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Golem08 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I often use the twinkle or redwarn rollback tool to revert vandalism or sock edits, however sometimes it does not load for me. I'm requesting access to the rollback tool as it would make things much easier. I'm familiar with when to use rollback and would be confident with this tool. Thank you. Golem08 (talk) 01:19, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:08, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• MikeVitale (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been stepping up my template editing in recent months, and believe that I meet the requirements. I likely haven't made 5 significant edits to template-protected modules, but I think it's more than 0. I'll leave that up to the reviewer, though. I have contributed a number of simple templates that have become relatively standard-use in a short period of time, including {{Game-won}} and related templates, as well as {{Hockey season stats entry}} and related templates. MikeVitale 18:20, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Standard Guidelines review:

1. Y (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 18)
2. Y (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~18k)
3. Y (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: ~1000)
4. Y (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: NA)
5. N (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 1)
6. N (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 1)

Primefac (talk) 19:30, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done, till the end of Jan, I see a lot of "normal" template editing occuring and that gives me some hope, I'm gonna give the right till the end of Jan and once that time is up, if you still need it for a longer period, we can discuss the edits made. Sohom (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

• UpTheOctave! (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'm active in counter-vandalism and anti-spam, and I am increasingly coming across more complex cases involving temporary accounts. This permission will help me better resolve situations like these. I have 6 months tenure and over 300 edits, and understand the importance of protecting privacy per the WMF policy. Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 11:18, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 11:25, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

• Ktrimi991 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

As a Balkans-focused editor, I have a long record of reporting socking (both at SPI and by directly contacting relevant admins). The ability to compare IP ranges and geolocations has been central to my work on that front. I fully understand the relevant privacy policies and practices. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:49, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 07:22, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• EEng (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I can't say I'd use the privilege frequently, but at times I have found IP information helpful when investigating vandalism and puppetry. I promise to use this power only for good, never for evil. EEng 02:17, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 17:06, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• RGloucester (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have participated in many SPIs over the years, and have a history of working to prevent long-term abuse on controversial articles. While I expect I will only use this right occasionally, I would appreciate being permitted to have it in my toolbox for such occasions. I have read, understand, and agree to all terms and conditions attached to this right. Yours, &c. RGloucester — ☎ 00:32, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done Sohom (talk) 03:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)