Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 28#Transformer effect

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< June 27	June 29 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Green Monkey Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this indie record label passes WP:GNG. The article as written is mostly referenced to primary sources or blogs. I could not find much coverage in my own search, just a couple short articles from local newspapers found on newspapers.com. Mbdfar (talk) 14:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Washington. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm in the process of finding WP:IRS and was able to find one today from The Rocket magazine https://washingtondigitalnewspapers.org/?a=d&d=RCT19860401.1.9&srpos=2&e=-------en-20-RCT-1--txt-txIN-green+monkey+records------ I assume it is acceptable. If not please let me know. I will add more content and WP:IRS as time permits. I am fairly new here as far as contributing. Otheriver (talk) 23:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do consider that a WP:RS, but more will be needed to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Consider WP:AUD – The Rocket at the time was a small, Seattle-based music magazine. My search also turned up some additional The Rocket articles, but are you able to find additional sources that cover the subject in-depth? Mbdfar (talk) 18:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure yet. I'm still at the beginning of my research. I was going to check a Seattle Times article the same day, but it was behind a paywall. I have some other places I need to check and read yet. Otheriver (talk) 01:59, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are enough sources to establish notability given that there is less media available online from that time frame. Also the label had a few established acts. Darkm777 (talk) 18:51, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Where are these sources that establish notability? Mbdfar (talk) 19:09, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I had tagged this in 2023 and see nothing that has taken place since that time to establish notability (a quick BEFORE search finds nothing meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. As far as "there is less media available online from that time frame" - what time frame? The 1980s? We have archives and I searched those as well. Didn't find what is necessary to show WP:NCORP. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chase Ergen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized (see "public image" section in particular) WP:BLP of a businessperson, not properly referenced as passing inclusion criteria for businesspeople. As always, people in business are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they have jobs, and have to be shown to pass certain specific criteria supported by WP:GNG-worthy coverage about them in reliable sources -- but this is referenced almost entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability, such as "staff" profiles or press releases self-published by his own companies and/or directory entries, with very little GNG-worthy coverage shown at all.
Further, this has already been moved into draftspace once for lacking GNG-worthy sourcing, only to get moved back into articlespace by its own creator two days later -- so while moving it back into draftspace a second time is obviously possible, I'm not going to do that without wider discussion about whether it's warranted in this case or not. Bearcat (talk) 14:30, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 14:30, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Finance, Politics, and Colorado. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:V. This person is not notable, and we can't verify notability if all the sources are tied somehow to him. Bearian (talk) 09:26, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I dropped a lot of the extra sources. I think notability is warranted but I had to drop the majority of the article to find it. Dflovett (talk) 18:42, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Obvious spam, I suspect paid - David Gerard (talk) 19:54, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Move back to Draftspace. I see enough notability in my own googling of "Chase Ergen" and exploration of related topics, but I don't think the current article properly conveys it. I am going to go in and trim down some of this, add in more reliable sources. Dflovett (talk) 16:49, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As I look deeper, there are lots of issues with the current references setup. Will be attempting to clean those up as well. Dflovett (talk) 17:47, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Likely COI/paid editing. Edwardx (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed on all the signs of COI/paid editing but now that I've trimmed it down and dropped a lot of the junk sources, I think it doesn't fail WP:GNG anymore. I've also neutralized the tone, or at least I consider it to be neutralized. Dflovett (talk) 14:05, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Comments on Dflovett's changes?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Huayi Publishing House

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like a press release and it may be better to WP:STARTOVER. Amigao (talk) 01:15, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:20, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. Lei, Ben 雷奔 (2001). "书业 "黑马" 细说生意经——华艺出版社的陋巷传奇" [Publishing Industry 'Dark Horse' Shares Business Secrets — The Alleyway Legend of Huayi Publishing House]. 文化月刊 [Cultural Monthly] (in Chinese).
  This is a citation from Google Scholar.
2. "华艺出版社：我们是怎样包装崔永元(1)" [Huayi Publishing: How We Packaged Cui Yongyuan (Part 1)]. china.com [zh] (in Chinese). 2001-07-30. Archived from the original on 2007-02-03. Retrieved 2025-06-15.
  The article notes: "华艺出版社因成功包装名人图书而在出版界享有盛誉。虽然，金丽红认为，华艺出版的大多数书并不是名人书；但事实上，华艺成功推出了不少名人书，如吴小莉的《足音》、敬一丹的《声音》、白岩松的《痛并快乐着》等，还有姜文、徐静蕾、高峰等人的书，而且，这些图书几乎是推出一本畅销一本。另外，著名作家如刘心武、王朔、王蒙、刘震云等人的重要著作，差不多也都是华艺率先推出的。" From Google Translate: "Huayi Publishing House enjoys a good reputation in the publishing industry for its successful packaging of celebrity books. Although Jin Lihong believes that most of the books published by Huayi are not celebrity books; in fact, Huayi has successfully launched many celebrity books, such as Wu Xiaoli's Footworks, Jing Yidan's Voice, Bai Yansong's Pain and Happiness, etc., as well as books by Jiang Wen, Xu Jinglei, Gao Feng and others, and these pictures The book is almost a best-selling book. In addition, the important works of famous writers such as Liu Xinwu, Wang Shuo, Wang Meng, Liu Zhenyun and others are almost all pioneered by Huayi."
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Huayi Publishing House (simplified Chinese: 华艺出版社; traditional Chinese: 華藝出版社) to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 11:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The policies say that articles containing flaws should not be deleted if they can be improved. Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion says, If editing can address all relevant reasons for deletion, this should be done rather than deleting the page. Wikipedia:Editing policy#Wikipedia is a work in progress: perfection is not required says, Perfection is not required: Wikipedia is a work in progress. Collaborative editing means that incomplete or poorly written first drafts can evolve over time into excellent articles. Even poor articles, if they can be improved, are welcome. Cunard (talk) 11:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:31, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shirley Willard

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a local historian, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for historians. As always, people are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they have or had jobs, and have to be shown to pass certain defined notability criteria supported by WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about their work in media and/or books -- but this is referenced entirely to primary source content self-published by non-media organizations she was directly affiliated with, and shows absolutely no evidence of GNG-worthy sourcing at all. (For example, people do not become notable enough for Wikipedia articles by having staff profiles on the websites of their own employers, or contributor directories on the websites of publications that they wrote for — media unaffiliated with her work have to write about and analyze the significance of her work as news to make her notable on that basis.)
As her potential claim of notability is primarily local in nature rather than national, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with better access to the necessary resources than I've got can actually find sufficient RS coverage to get her over the bar, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have significantly better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, History, and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:18, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: She did win awards, including a state-wide award for her work. WP:Author doesn't require national accomplishments. One might make the case that winning an award from the state's primary historical society might be "significant critical attention"? --
Jaireeodell (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say people always have to have nationalized accomplishments to be eligible for an article — I said that because her notability claim is local rather than national in nature, I lack access to the kind of resources necessary to determine whether the article is salvageable with better referencing or not on my own, without bringing it to wider attention. People can get into Wikipedia on primarily local significance — but regardless of whether their notability claim is local or national in scope, people aren't exempted from having to have WP:GNG-worthy reliable sourcing.
Also, every award that exists does not constitute an automatic notability freebie — a person is not automatically notable just because the article has the word "award" in it, if the article doesn't have GNG-worthy reliable sourcing in it. "Significant critical attention", for the purposes of GNG, is a question of whether she's had news reportage and/or books written about her and her work, not just the fact of having been singled out for just any old award that exists — an award might help if it could be referenced to a newspaper article treating "Shirley Willard wins award" as news, but it doesn't help if you have to depend on content self-published by the organization that gave her the award to source the statement because media coverage about the award doesn't exist. We're not just looking for "has done stuff", we're looking for "has had media coverage and/or books written and published about the stuff she did". Bearcat (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ミラP@Miraclepine 21:59, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wonderful woman, no doubt, but I simply cannot find any of her writings that aren't "self-published" - i.e. by the historical society she was working with in some capacity. She did get two awards from the Indiana Historical Society, but I don't think that is going to confirm notability. She is given credit for unearthing the story of this "Trail of Death" but I only find a very few mentions of it by folks not directly associated with the historical society. Lamona (talk) 16:11, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just asking for clarification on what you are asking for here- are you asking for the historical veracity of the Potawatomi Trail of Death? If so, there is already a Wikipedia article discussing its history. I am not writing that she was responsible for discovering it, she is just a historian who has taken important steps to preserve its memory in local history. Willard is responsible for the Trail of Courage festival and commemorative caravan, if that's what you meant. Here are some mentions of the Trail of Living Courage Festival and caravan from sources not associated with Willard or the Fulton County Historical Society:

https://www.dar.org/national-society/american-spirit-magazine/beacon-history-shirley-willard (Page dedicated to her on the Daughters of the American Revolution website, already in article)

https://www.southbendtribune.com/story/news/local/2018/09/13/caravan-to-trace-potawatomi-trail-of-death-from-rochester/45724091/ (News article about about Trail of Death commemorative caravan Willard organized)

https://www.in.gov/ibc/legacyprojects/3261.htm (entry on Indiana government website about the festival, already in article)

If these sources are satisfactory, I can start reworking the article around these and replace the Fulton Co. Historical Society ones. DeishaJ (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will look at these sources, but, no, I'm not asking about the trail of death. This article is about HER so we need sources about HER. Lamona (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some additional sources I've found:

https://www.carrollcountycomet.com/articles/historian-recognized-with-statewide-award/ (News article referencing her Lifetime Achievement award. I have contacted the Indiana Historical Society to see if they have any writings or press releases on her that would work as citations).

https://www.rochsent.com/willard-featured-on-publishers-blog/article_1ec925d0-4190-541b-9020-c01655ba74d8.html (Lists her history and achievements with the Fulton Co. Historical Society. Also mentions her Lifetime Achievement award and Golden Hoosier award, mentions her being a torch bearer in the Indiana Bicentennial Torch Relay. I have confirmed her participation, she is listed here under Fulton County. Link to the page of the Indiana government website I found the PDF on.

Additional sources for consideration:

https://www.potawatomi.org/blog/2016/09/28/chairman-barrett-honored-at-2016-trail-of-courage-festival/

https://www.potawatomi.org/blog/2017/06/27/indiana-declares-indian-day/

I will let others decide if these sources are good enough to work in this article, as they are technically blog posts. I will argue, though, that they are from the official Potawatomi tribe website. These sources mention Willard playing a key role in securing proclamations from Mike Pence and Eric Holcomb in recognition of the Trail of Death and establishing remembrance/heritage days. These might be notable additions to her article, but I am unsure if they would meet proper reference criteria. Is there any way to find good sources for these proclamations:

Mike Pence declaring Sept. 20, 2014 Potawatomi Trail of Death Remembrance Day

Eric Holcomb declaring April 22, 2017 Indiana Indian Day

Thanks!
DeishaJ (talk) 15:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, blog posts are not considered reliable because they are informal and lack a true editorial oversight. The DAR one is pretty good but may not be considered independent because she was a member of DAR and this is a "member profile." Press releases are never considered reliable sources because they are by definition promotional, and thus have a non-neutral point of view. I hope that others will weigh in on the awards. (I advise looking at the documents about those awards - unless you are already familiar with them.) Lamona (talk) 02:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oyayubihime (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately, after looking around for sources to the best of my ability, searching under both English and Japanese names, I can't find any good sources for this film. The other-language equivalents of this article appear about as barren of useful references as this is (although the Japanese article is about the anthology series of films that this is part of, rather than the film by itself). The only reference I do know of is this article about Saeko: Giantess Dating Sim which briefly mentions it, but obviously that doesn't pass SIGCOV. If anyone can find any good sources, I'd be happy to see this kept, but as the situation stands I'm not seeing it. silviaASH (inquire within) 20:37, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Film, Television, Visual arts, Popular culture, and Japan. silviaASH (inquire within) 20:37, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Rename and refocus on Kowai Dōwa. It will make the Japanese interwiki more consistent. The renamed page can be expanded with sources in Japanese about this TV series, of which this is a part. All actors of this "episode" (but one) have a page on the Japanese Wikipedia. OR redirect to Kankurō Kudō#Writer (Television), a section in the article about the screenwriter. OR merge into Thumbelina#Live action, a section in the article about similar adaptations of the original tale. Thank you.--Artus Sauerfog Dark-Eon (talk) 21:51, 16 June 2025 (UTC) ( Blocked sockpuppet)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Please offer one suggestion, not three. Also, the outcome of an AFD can not be Rename or Move as that is an editorial decision that editors must discuss. So, if that is the result you want, argue to Keep and then a Move can be discussed on the article talk page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that relisting comment was partially addressed to me, so I'll reply. "Rename" seems to be a perfectly valid and pretty standard AfD !vote. As it implies refocusing the article on a broader subject matter that includes the topic discussed here, I think it is best to leave my !vote the way I originally conceived it. "Rename" implies a Keep, yes, but I assume any good faith closer will understand that. As for one suggestion not three, please see Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#One bolded vote, which clearly states:

Editors may leave multiple recommendations as alternatives when unsure, for instance "Merge or redirect".

Artus Sauerfog Dark-Eon (talk) 12:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme leader

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The scope of the article is too vague for this to be sustainable. If "supreme leader" is the *specific* title that is "supreme leader" in English, we only have three contemporary claimants: the leaders of North Korea, Afghanistan, and Iran. They share little in common except for a specific linguistic coincidence. If "supreme leader" is a descriptive title, then we can fold this page into autocracy and not conduct WP:OR by trying to analyze what titles are "close" to being supreme leader. Bremps... 18:11, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was also nominated before, so I'll address that specifically. While the proposed criteria was "widely described as a supreme leader", due to differences in language, we might be grouping different types of leaders together under what happens to translate into the same thing ("supreme leader") in English. Bremps... 18:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Inclusion in this list seems to be based on nothing but WP:OR regarding an English-language translation of individuals titles, if even that. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Autocrat or move to List of Autocrats if the existence of that sort of list article can be justified. Agree that inclusion criteria are too vague and prone to WP:OR. -- LWG ^talk 18:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd have to suggest that a List of Autocrats article would be a very bad idea. Who is or isn't an autocrat largely comes down to opinion, for anything but a few historic cases (if that). We'd probably end up with a 'list of people described as 'autocratic in a single source', accompanied by endless disputes over whether a particular individual should be included. Wikipedia shouldn't present opinion as fact. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Bremps... 19:53, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to List of autocrats. Knox490 (talk) 20:20, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Autocrat per LWG EricXXue (talk) 20:01, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Cfls (talk) 01:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment None of the above makes much (any) sense to me so I'll merely note that Supreme Leader (disambiguation) exists. Thincat (talk) 09:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article has a number of problems, of which are: vagueness of the criteria for inclusion (who decides who is and who isn't a "supreme leader"?);it's OR because many of these have not called themselves or been called "supreme leader"; it only covers 1900+ as if history started then. Lamona (talk) 03:45, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Its important to keep this page to make every related subject easy to find, if its merged or deleted it'll just get lost with a bunch of unrelated topics ☞ Rim ^{< Talk | Edits >} 06:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Autocracy. Nothing to merge; most of the list is unsourced, and such a list scope invites WP:OR as well. Yue🌙 21:19, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TNT. This is a huge pile of poorly sourced synth/OR. After it is deleted, we can consider placing a redirect here or moving the DAB page to the main title. But the primary issue is what to do with the current content, which in my opinion has to go. Toadspike [Talk] 05:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Clear consensus against keep. Less clear between delete outright and merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 23:31, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ICC Asia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No such organization exists, complete WP:OR, WP:SYNTH and made-up. Asian Cricket Council is the actual organization. Vestrian24Bio 23:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Cricket, and Asia. Shellwood (talk) 23:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Vestrian24Bio 09:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete looks made up, as no sources suggest it exists. Even if it does, fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:44, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Anthony Lontayao

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NBIO. Not supported by reliable and significant coverage. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Philippines. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero sources in the Philippines media, which loves their feature stories and boxing. Bearian (talk) 01:52, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Boxing and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:29, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not seeing significant independent coverage from reliable sources. Mentions appear to be at blogs, youtube, facebook, linked in, and some mentions in articles about fights he announced. None of that shows WP notability to me. Papaursa (talk) 17:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

South Europe College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable for-profit university. No significant and reliable coverage whatsoever. Does not meet ORGCRIT. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:06, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, and Malta. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:06, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

James Brown (internet personality)

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/James Brown (internet personality)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CREATIVE. There are many people in history who have gone viral for one thing but it didn't make them long-term notable; ie WP:SINGLEEVENT. This article has no reason to stay. It is mostly about a controversy with another creative Bobrisky; which has this article leaning towards WP:PSEUDO. Besides him being known for cross-dressing in Nigeria (an act that would be reported by the blogs/websites/news regardless of the person), there is no point in this person having an article. It also fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:BASIC. There is no sources that are verifying this person as a professional dancer. There is a source that mentioned he released a single but it is not notable as it did not chart, receive award nominations/wins, or receive any music certifications. Sackkid (talk) 21:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sexuality and gender, and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 22:01, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Also note this article was started by the subject himself, a clear violation of WP:AUTOBIO. Sackkid (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT and WP:OR. What a mess: it's like a games of Twelves meets a Battenberg pastry. As I've written dozens of times, autobiographies are almost always original research. I have complete sympathy with the subject, who is subject to discrimination I haven't seen in the United States in my lifetime. Bearian (talk) 02:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CREATIVE, WP:BLP1E, etc. Going viral once isn't pageworthy. Astaire (talk) 17:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jungian cognitive functions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has consistently violated the standards of NOR, and NFRINGE since it was created. A talk page discussion about its basic problems in 2022 brought no progress, and after three years, nothing has changed. As the recent proposal for deletion was contested, I am starting this discussion.

1. The opening sentence reads: "Psychological functions, as described by Carl Jung in his book Psychological Types...". In fact, a significant part of this article is about interpretations of MBTI adherents, and people deeply influenced by the MBTI. This is an entirely arbitrary selection. For example, we have an article on Socionics, which is excluded here. This is unresolved because there is no independent, reliable, and comprehensive treatment of the idea this article is trying to describe. Therefore, it is original research.

2. The personality psychology field widely dismisses Jung's theory of psychological functions, and any concurrent developments, such as type dynamics in MBTI, or socionics. It is definitely a fringe theory. There seems to be no secondary, independent literature on the article's topic in general. I am not aware of it, and it seems that in the past 20 years, it has never been found. Therefore, this fringe topic within an already fringe topic lacks notability.

What can be salvaged should be merged to Psychological Types. That is the original work of the book, which is found in both articles. There are no foreseeable difficulties for that partial merge. I proposed a merge in 2022, but the discussion ended with no consensus. As for the rest of its content, the only solution seems to be deletion. It appears that maintaining this article will only cause more readers to be mislead, and potentially serve as a platform for advertising more 'models' which are included only on the basis of their hobbyist popularity. Dege31 (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Psychiatry and Psychology. Dege31 (talk) 21:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thekla Popov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A google search reveals nothing except for period sources from mid-September 1882 and I couldn't find anything in academic sources. Even those 1882 sources were simply a report of her crimes and that she was arrested. The only modern source I could find was this i Paper article, which is a brief mention. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG Grumpylawnchair (talk) 21:45, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime and Hungary. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 21:45, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:50, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is plenty of contemporary reporting, although more work is required. Modern commentary is based on contemporary documents. There may be more detail available if the Hungarian and Austrian orthography can be determined. Note that this is one of the highest claims for serial murder. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 12:03, 29 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Chinese boot camps

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:STARTOVER. Also, this is the same recycled material that banned WP:SPA socks have been pushing at Boot camp (correctional) for some time such as DonaldJuniorTrump, Truthpedic, Liberty666, and Free258. Amigao (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – This article covers a notable and widely reported phenomenon in modern China: the rise of privately run "boot camps" or "special training schools" (特训学校) aimed at treating internet addiction, behavioral problems, and providing so-called employment opportunities. This is a real-world issue that has received sustained coverage in independent, reliable sources, including:

The New York Times

The Guardian

CNN

Sixth Tone

China Daily

China Youth Daily (中国青年报)

Caixin

These institutions have drawn significant domestic and international scrutiny due to alleged human rights abuses, fatalities, and widespread controversy about their treatment methods, particularly toward minors. There is a clear distinction between these boot camps and general military schools or vocational training centers.

The article’s topic meets Wikipedia’s General Notability Guidelines (GNG), with multiple sources providing in-depth, independent coverage over many years. The issue has also influenced public policy, with government crackdowns and legal reforms related to such facilities.

Finally, while the article can be improved in tone or sourcing, these are editing concerns—not reasons for deletion. The topic is encyclopedic, notable, and verifiable. Therefore, the article should be retained and improved, not removed. Korpace (talk) 02:47, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Struck comment from blocked sock. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 20:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, looks LLM-generated. Geschichte (talk) 07:54, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've spot checked a few sources and the complete and utter absence of WP:TSI make explosives the only appropriate way to deal with this. On the other hand, even if this is deleted, we need not start entirely from scratch, for we have entirely pre-GPT content covering the topic area! (Some such content predates Transformers entirely, but significantly lesser in extent, only 3 sentences totalling 68 words) More extensive than the zhwiki article even, at least at first glance. It probably still needs editing for tone and style, but at least is probably less likely to be made up wholesale. If editors do choose to spin out content from the other article, I would suggest internet addiction camp is likely a more recognisable title in english. Also, needless to say, editing that content with AI slop to expand it after (or before for that matter) a spin out is no bueno, and if anyone does that they should probably be blocked for WP:DE. You know, in case this sparks any ideas. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:48, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom Laura240406 (talk) 13:53, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and recreate as Internet addiction camp. Agreed that this looks LLM-generated and there are WP:TSI issues (as well as citing sources that don't even seem to exist). But the topic itself clearly meets WP:GNG: see e.g. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]. Astaire (talk) 15:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. While I agree that this would ordinarily be a WP:TNT deletion given the rampant issues with misrepresentation of sources (WP:TSI) from the few spot checks that I did, there are genuinely a host of useful sources and the topic seems to meet WP:GNG, especially considering that only English-language sources are currently present and there would undoubtedly be multiple more in Chinese. Drafting it would allow someone to either put in the extensive time to rewrite it so it's fit for mainspace, or allow someone wanting to start from scratch to use its reflist. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 17:54, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per others as WP:LLM slop created by a sockpuppet. I disagree with Patar's draftify justification because source lists compiled by LLM's can be completely made up, irrelevent, or unreliable for Wikipedia's purposes (ex. one of the sources in article is Global Times which is deprecated) Jumpytoo Talk 20:48, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just because LLMs can hallucinate sources or use poor sources doesn't mean that every LLM-found source falls into those categories. Yes, Global Times is deprecated, but the article exists and is hardly out of line with the multiple other existing reliable sources that cover the abuses in the industry: including BBC [14], Guardian [15], ABC [16], CNN [17], Washington Post [18], Reuters [19], Hindustan Times [20], Sixth Tone [21][22], Mashable [23], Quartz [24], Washington Times [25], VOA [26]. With a non-LLM, more salvageable article, that's an easy WP:GNG pass. If someone wants to work on an article, it's something to work with. If no one does, it'll be gone in half a year via WP:G13 anyway. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 01:34, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fight and Deliver Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In the 2025 New York City mayoral election, Andrew Cuomo created an independent ballot line called "Fight and Deliver Party." I've seen no evidence that this has been registered as an actual political party or that anyone is collecting the necessary signatures. In New York, independent candidates can use whatever ballot label they want, and it seems like that's what happened here. I seriously doubt that this "party" will continue to exist after the 2025 mayoral race. Cuomo announced the creation of the "party" nearly 2 months ago, and it doesn't seem to have any website or online presence, nor is there any information about who is filling the leadership positions in the "party" (chair, vice chair, treasurer, secretary, etc). I'd suggest a redirect to 2025 New York City mayoral election. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 21:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and New York. Shellwood (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom. Longestview (talk) 21:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom, although Andrew_Cuomo#2025_New_York_City_mayoral_campaign might be more helpful to the reader. Star Mississippi 00:40, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom, agree with Andrew_Cuomo#2025_New_York_City_mayoral_campaign JSwift49 12:59, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Andrew Cuomo#2025 New York City mayoral campaign. This seems like a single-candidate ballot line instead of an actual political party, and as such doesn't meet WP:GNG. – Epicgenius (talk) 15:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep despite not being per nom, the party does have registered members who are interested in the campaign. Also, since Cuomo is high in the polls in the NY debate, it's better to keep this page as his mayoral campaign, or merge the two. 2601:600:8D82:6200:0:0:0:B90C (talk) 20:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect instead to Andrew Cuomo § 2025 New York City mayoral campaign as discussed above, not per nom. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 21:57, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above – Muboshgu (talk) 23:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easytown, Indiana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another case where WP:GEOLAND's presumption of notability is called into question, because once again I'm failing to find sources other than primary sources which tell the truth about this place: namely, to the degree to which this ever existed, is doesn't now exist. I did find one reference which seemed to associate it with a mine, but nothing with any substance; and the aerials (including GMaps) show that it was utterly erased some time in the 1970s, to the point where the only evidence it was ever there is GNIS and the corresponding map label. If someone can find something better than Baker and updates the article, I'll be glad to withdraw this, But I'm again bothered by the notion of an article which can tell the truth about the place only through my exercise of WP:OR. Mangoe (talk) 21:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 21:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: The town was the subject of a 1998 article in the Indianapolis News [27], which claims it was demolished in 1978. Is this enough for a WP page? I can find a few other mentions over the years in newspapers but most are passing, talking about unusual place names or mentioning someone "from Easytown". WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:45, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Vermillion County historical society's 1990 book describes it as a "former town" where a mining worker lived. [28] A listing in a scholarly article on coal mines lists the mine as "Universal Easytown." It's really thin, but it might be enough. SportingFlyer T·C 08:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The role of museums in repatriating African ancestors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTESSAY. Declined WP:PROD that is redundant with Repatriation (cultural property). Astaire (talk) 21:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts, Museums and libraries, and Africa. Astaire (talk) 21:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:NOTESSAY as per above. Mangoe (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Every section in Repatriation (cultural property) discusses museums. Please consider what articles already cover a topic and contribute there before creating a new duplicative page. Reywas92^Talk 21:36, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (original proposer) ―Howard • 🌽³³ 10:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Angus King III

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Businessman, gubernatorial candidate, and son of a U.S. Senator. Nearly all news coverage cited on the page is news outlets covering the announcement of his gubernatorial campaign, which is ROTM coverage. Outside of that, I don't see much more news coverage, nor do I see anything he's done that would make him worthy of a Wikipedia page. I'd support a redirect to 2026 Maine gubernatorial election. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 21:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politicians, and Maine. Shellwood (talk) 21:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with redirect. He's not yet notable. 331dot (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect is the typical outcome in similar situations. Both WP:TOOSOON and WP:NOTINHERITED. The United States rejected kings and aristocratic positions. Bearian (talk) 02:08, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (while noting I am the article creator). As I've explained at Talk:Angus King III, I think King meets the WP:GNG with significant coverage in NBC News, Boston Globe, Washington Post, Politico, Semafor, etc. This is not ROTM coverage, as evidenced by the fact that other candidates who've announced their candidacies (e.g. Ken Capron, David Jones, Robert Wessels) have not received similar coverage simply for announcing their campaigns. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:45, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Repatriation of the Benin Bronzes to Nigeria

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:POVFORK of Benin Bronzes#Subsequent sales, restitutions and repatriations with biased language such as growing global awareness of colonial injustices and profound spiritual, historical and artistic significance. This content belongs at the Benin Bronzes article. Astaire (talk) 21:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts, Museums and libraries, and Nigeria. Astaire (talk) 21:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect Benin Bronzes#Subsequent sales, restitutions and repatriations needs some sections to break it up for clearer organization, but there's simply no reason why this needs to be a largely duplicative separate article. Reywas92^Talk 21:34, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zee Marathi Utsav Natyancha Awards 2021

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The 2023 version of these awards was closed as a result of an AfD last year as a redirect (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zee Marathi Utsav Natyancha Awards 2023). CNMall41 and at least one other editor have redirected this as per that afd's result, but they keep getting reverted by ip editors, who never improve the article. CNMall41's rationale for the other year also applies here: "Fails WP:GNG. Main page Zee Marathi Utsav Natyancha Awards exists which is also likely not notable so not seeing how this would meet notability guidelines. Cannot find enough coverage to establish it for this specific year. " Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:53, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and India. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:46, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A ceremony where competing networks are effectively excluded, so this is just a fan-voted de facto 'employee of the year' ceremony. Nathannah • 📮 20:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - Thanks for the ping. My contention is stated in the AfD recommendation and edit summaries. The individual year is not notable as references just talk about winners, not about the show itself. Even the main award page is short of significant coverage about the award (just references verifying winners and nominees). Note that the 2023 award was previously decided at AfD to merge. Should this close as the same (or delete), I will be WP:BOLDly merging years 2014 through current. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:45, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. What is the target article that would be identified if this article was changed to a Redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As best I can tell, the intended redirect target is Zee Marathi Utsav Natyancha Awards; this has been alluded to (just without the link) elsewhere in this discussion, and was also the target article for the repeatedly-contested BLARs. (I offer no opinion or further comment.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:38, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I'm not fluent enough in foreign languages to fully assess the sources for notability, but I want to push back on the idea that it is not notable as references just talk about winners, not about the show itself. In my experience, this is not how awards ceremonies are assessed. Consider something like 74th Writers Guild of America Awards – the only references are about the nominees and winners, yet I doubt anyone would seriously challenge that article's notability. If reliable, independent sources discuss the ceremony's nominees and winners as a group, then it is reasonable to create a list for the nominees and winners at the ceremony; see Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists#Notability. Now, I don't know enough about Indian media to gauge if the provided sources are reliable and independent of the network presenting the awards, hence my lack of a !vote – but if they are reliable and independent, I think the ceremony is notable. RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:39, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a related deletion discussion showing that individual year awards are notable based on winner lists? I do not see where the WGA awards you linked to was every evaluated. Simply existing does not mean it is notable.--CNMall41 (talk) 23:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My entire point is the lack of any attempts to delete the list – nobody has challenged its notability even though the sources only cover that year's winners/nominees. This is only one example from many similar awards ceremony lists (for instance, the WGA, DGA, and PGA Awards), showing a WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS that this is acceptable for proving notability. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:56, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So you are saying that since no one has challenged its notability until now then it must be notable? I don't follow. Please see this as well. Again, can you point to a deletion discussion where this has been the case? I am trying to see where there is consensus for your original contention.--CNMall41 (talk) 05:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2026 Formula 2 Championship

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero in-depth independent sourcing currently. And Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:26, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - article currently references six sources, of which three are directly about the 2026 season, one talks about the timespan of 2024-2027 and therefore also mentions the 2026 season and two talk about the championship in general. Hmnphl (talk) 18:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
pinging Jestal50 (talk · contribs), Thfeeder (talk · contribs) and BryOn2205U (talk · contribs) as they have all been active on the 2025 article so they might also have a say on this. Hmnphl (talk) 18:51, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON. The best source is the schedule announcement coverage, everything else is primary sourcing that is not about the 2026 season specifically (even if it is technically about it, not sigcov) Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 20:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to closer - Keep !voter above blatantly canvassed 3 editors. Nice.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:13, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — I think it's too soon for this page to exist. Except for the calendar there is nothing else 100% confirmed about next year's season. No drivers announced yet, and teams or the points system for example are not confirmed to be the same as this year as indicated on the 2026 article. So there's no point in keeping a page, which is basically empty. User:BryOn2205 (talk) 09:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: I agree that the page was published too soon, but there’s no need to delete the existing article when the same exact content (such as the calendar or entry list table) is going to have to be added once again when drivers start to get announced. Full deletion is unnecessary. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 10:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify WP:TOOSOON, but given the importance of the series and how previous seasons have reached notability more sources will be published and the 2026 season will (almost) certainly meet notability criteria.Giuliotf (talk) 14:08, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no consensus. Typical outcomes in AFDs regarding articles about future events is usually to Draftify them.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drugyel Higher Secondary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Sources are either from the school itself or mention the school in passing or not at all. No demonstration of standalone notability. A redirect may be an appropriate alternative to deletion, but I have no proposal for a good target. Yue🌙 19:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Asia. Yue🌙 19:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - although the sourcing could be better, there are assertions of notability regarding alumnae, etc. Bearian (talk) 14:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- most citations seems to be passing mentions and lacks SIGCOV with the first one being deadlink, if alumnae of the school is notable enough, perhaps make an article on the subject. and have the school be mentioned.Lorraine Crane (talk) 01:53, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not one of the sources contributes anything towards notability per WP:ORG. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Are these "assertions of notability" supported by reliable sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Global Trance Network

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable music company. No significant coverage to establish notability Coldupnorth (talk) 20:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:21, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Spoke Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unusual one. This was a page for two record labels. I was going to nominate it after the founder of one of them was deleted. Then, Cielquiparle added references and removed the one I was going to nominate. The problem is that none of them meeet WP:NCORP. Broken Spoke Records probably only had 10 releases in total. The added references are about a performer and only mention the label. Geschichte (talk) 20:21, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:04, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
keep This article is about a 1980s-90s publisher in the United States. There are cited two sources which are about artists whom this publisher featured, and those articles each describe the publisher in a few sentences. For pre-internet sourcing on paper newspapers, I have lower expectations for what constitutes GNG, and I feel this passes. Also, I have lower expectations for how much content we need for Wikipedia articles on publishers, because I favor the editorial practice of being more inclusive of Wikipedia content on publishers based on the essay Wikipedia:Notability (media). I recognize that this article could only ever be a few sentences, but describing publishers is a specialty that I think works well for Wikipedia. Bluerasberry (talk) 16:22, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia doesn't have such a "specialty". This label was nowhere near influential. Geschichte (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't have enough reliable sources. I might have agreed to keep if the label had notable releases with reviews, but it doesn't appear so.Darkm777 (talk) 00:46, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non notable record label, only made 10 songs. Fails WP:NMUSIC. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Pekalongan flood and landslide

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA - Routine kinds of news events (including most .. accidents ..) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Indonesia. XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:15, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SIGCOV and WP:LASTING: "Events that have a noted and sourced permanent effect of historical significance are likely to be notable. This includes, for example, natural disasters that result in widespread destruction, since they lead to rebuilding ..." Effects here included a 14-day disaster emergency, eleven districts that were affected, buildings that were destroyed, bridges that were swept away, 25 deaths, 13 injured, 2 or 3 people who disappeared (often also dead). gidonb (talk) 03:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not the subject of sustained significant secondary coverage. Articles like this should not be created unless the event is written about retrospectively. Wikipedia is not a repository of miscellaneous news stories. Falls far below the standard set at WP:LASTING. Note that quantities associated with a subject are not factored into AfD. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 22:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, quantities associated with a subject are not factored into AfD. Yet, that is stating the irrelevant. The relevant information is that, like the above, WP:EFFECTs are factored into AfDs so your argument was already refuted before it was written! gidonb (talk) 03:04, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 03:52, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MERMOZ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating deletion on behalf of an IP editor:

Contested WP:PROD with no reason given. My original concern was: Appears to be a nonnotable project. Most of the sources cited don't even mention it, and those that do are either press releases or written by people involved with the project; can't find any secondary independent coverage. 35.139.154.158 (talk)

--JBL (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astronomy and Biology. JBL (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: in the current version of the article, footnote 1 is a conference poster by members of MERMOZ, footnote 2 is TheDebrief about which there's an ongoing RfC at RSN which is dominated by negative evaluations, footnote 3 looks like churnalism/a press release (among other things the "author" is "University of Bern"), footnote 4 seems to be the same thing as footnote 3 (another indication that this is basically just a press release), footnote 5 is some sort of research plan by members of the group, footnote 6 is an academic article that doesn't mention MERMOZ that I can see, and footnote 7 is a website at U Bern that I wasn't able to access. Taken together, this does not get anywhere near any notability guidelines. I have not endeavored to look for additional sources so far. --JBL (talk) 21:50, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

International Cycling History Conference

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page which are independent of the subject. Nothing much found which suggests there are sufficient RS to show that the notability criteria for inclusion have been met JMWt (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:39, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Church of the Ascension of Christ in Warsaw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, either in this article or the original in Polish. JohnMizuki (talk) 19:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Christianity, and Poland. Shellwood (talk) 19:34, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm having trouble searching in Polish, but it's an architecturally distinctive modern church - I'd be surprised if there's nothing on it beyond what's in the Polish article. SportingFlyer T·C 21:04, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Angle

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unnotable wrestler, only fame comes because of his brother Kurt Angle, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 18:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Wrestling, and Pennsylvania. Shellwood (talk) 18:55, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

merge into Kurt Angle, parts of his personal life such as his involvement in a steroid ring have received some news coverage, which is worth mentioning. These news articles do primarily refer to him as "Kurt Angle's brother", so Kurt Angle is probably the best place for it. beepboopbwaph (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes GNG. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] I also suspect there is an article about him in the March 2004 edition of The Wrestler (listed at List of professional wrestling magazines) "March 2004: McMahon vs. McWoman: How Vince vs. Stephanie Nearly Ruined WWE! Also: Flair & Dusty, Eric Angle, Jeff Jarrett, Shannon Moore, what's ahead in '04." The title of that issue is listed here ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:22, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those are all either one paragraph blurbs, or the fact he's Kurt Angle's brother. As noted here, "having a famous relative is not, in and of itself, sufficient to justify an independent article", and he does not pass GNG. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 21:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tongi East Thana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear how this passes WP:GNG or WP:NBUILDING. Govvy (talk) 15:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Bangladesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:56, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Gazipur Metropolitan Police per WP:ATD-M where it is mentioned. As the article stands, it is not an article about a thana so much as a one-liner that mentions the local police station, and it is sourced to trivial mentions. Sam Sailor 20:45, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

keep — I didn’t have time to expand Tongi East Thana because of the wave of AfDs happening at once. I made sure it wasn’t empty — it had 3 references. I planned to build on it, but mass deletion is stopping actual development before it can begin, i dont immediately blast dozens of sources, i create the pages but still put some information, as administrative units are relevant and they have information that should be known, and then i expand the page sometime later, but AfDs and AfCs have caused issues and reduced time to work on these, plus this isnt just another police building, how many times does it have to be told that there is a administrative difference between rural and urban, metropolitan thanas? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 18:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Esau Williams

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Repeatedly declined at AfC, author User:JM040930 moved to mainspace, draftified by User:Onel5969 , and it was moved back to mainspace again. Non-notable civil servant/journalist. qcne (talk) 18:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. qcne (talk) 18:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 18:32, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - and SALT. UPE/COI editor who insists on creating this promotional article. Does not meet WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:55, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - he's a known presenter - I saw his show on a recent vacation ("holiday") - but there are few public sources about him. Bearian (talk) 02:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:40, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sialkot Dagger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find reliable sources for this term. It is possible that this area is referred to by a different term for which there are sources. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Pakistan, and India. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Portuguese wiki does seem to show that it is called the Akhnoor Dagger or Chicken's Neck. No comment on notability at this time. SportingFlyer T·C 07:18, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Salient (geography) is the generic term for this kind of feature. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jammu and Kashmir-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and move to "Akhnoor Dagger" or return the article to "Chicken's Neck (Pakistan)", its title until an undiscussed move yesterday. While the name "Sialkot Dagger" is unreferenced, the place itself is notable as Akhnoor Dagger or Chicken's Neck. I have added some references to the article. — AjaxSmack 15:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding these references. I hadn't given any preference in my nomination statement, but I'm now suggesting that Move to "Akhnoor Dagger" seems to be the best option. I would argue that the term "Sialkot Dagger" doesn't have any reliable references for it and should be deleted once it becomes a redirect, but that might be an argument to be made at RFD later. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:46, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Move per AjaxSmack. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 03:19, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yaz (EP)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM due to nonexistent SIGCOV for this EP. The sources in the article are primary and do not contribute to establishing notability. It should be converted into a redirect targeting the artist article. Frost 06:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Turkey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mor ve ötesi: No SIGCOV in RS. No awards, charting or certified gold. Only sources are streaming, lyrics, YT and social media. Some sources in Turkish talk about the song Yaz Yaz Yaz but not the album. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 01:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any more support for redirect ATD?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wael Al-Masri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional article. فيصل (talk) 04:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Jordan. فيصل (talk) 04:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete Given that an administrator of Arabic Wikipedia believes that notability outside of promotional material has not been established, I am inclined to agree. I cannot validate sourcing in English to any degree that shows notability, and it would require a lot of cleanup to get this page in working order. Nonetheless, I think it could Return to Draftspace. PickleG13 (talk) 04:20, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: this guy is notable. The article itself definitely needs some work, but the subject himself meets WP:GNG based on the sourcing in the article and elsewhere. [44] [45] [46]. Cremastra (talk) 22:33, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever happens, it's currently written like a CV, and needs considerable cleanup. The sources don't look bad, though. SportingFlyer T·C 19:22, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Belgian provinces by life expectancy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDATABASE，the article looks like data tables? 日期20220626 (talk) 00:56, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness, Geography, Lists, and Belgium. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page really has a weak point that it contains little description. But that means that the description should be added. Deletion of the whole atricle with true and virified statistics for the topic, designed in convenient form, instead of adding the description is not a good strategy.

Possible solution: mark the page as a stub. — Lady3mlnm (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Possible solution: blow it up and start over again. Bearian (talk) 22:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If there is a person who will start it over again. — Lady3mlnm (talk) 12:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question - we have list articles for a reason. Does this article meet WP:NLIST? --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:02, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:50, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added a preamble to the article. — Lady3mlnm (talk) 18:37, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Demographics of Belgium: where it is a perfect fit, with no need to independently meet NLIST. Owen× ☎ 22:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It has 11 reliable sources, meaning it satisfies notability. Historyexpert2 (talk) 17:05, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 18:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

leaning delete The big issue here is the meaningfulness of the numbers. The spread over the whole set is pretty small, and about the only really "valid" conclusion I can draw is that Walloons tend to die a bit younger— assuming that the residency there is even a contributing factor. This really needs context to justify what otherwise is bordering on an offense against WP:NOTDATABASE. Mangoe (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that this comes across as properly part of a more general comparison between the provinces/regions than as a strictly demographic dump. Mangoe (talk) 21:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This is not a one-off list. Many similar ones exist, like List of Mexican states by life expectancy. In fact, there is one for every large state. See "Category:Ranked lists of country subdivisions". Historyexpert2 (talk) 22:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Corpus Christi Catholic Church, Wokingham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any independent WP:SIGCOV leading to a WP:GNG pass for this local Catholic parish church. Sources in the article include non-independent sites (parish webpage, parish newsletter, schooll webpage, the diocesan website [47], [48]), the WP:UGC GenUKI (see [Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_298#Royalcruft_again]); WP:PRIMARYSOURCE directory pages ([49], [50]); and a WP:TRIVIALMENTION ([51]. A WP:BEFORE search turns up many more directory listings and trivial mentions (example) but nothing we can work with for notability. Open to a redirect to Roman Catholic Diocese of Portsmouth but bringing it to AfD for that consensus since a draftification was contested with the addition of non-qualifying sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Christianity, and England. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete as a run-of-the-mill parish. I wouldn't redirect to the diocese as there is no list of parishes. Mangoe (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

keep Many of the other churches in the diocese have a Wikipedia page, so I believe that it's only fair that this one does. There might not be too many references because it isn't a huge parish, but many other churches' Wikipedia pages have even worse referencing, it it is difficult to find relevant sources. But I believe that the sources are not biased and it does not compromise the quality of the article. Eterin (talk) 09:56, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS -- it's not a valid argument to retain a page. If it's difficult to find sourcing for this topic then we should not keep it as a standalone mainspace page. Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 18:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hakan Akbas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable if it meets WP:SUSTAINED notability. Amigao (talk) 00:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Akbas appears to have no article on the Turkish Wikipedia (or any other). --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 02:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – He has coverage in national and international media and has appeared as a commentator on major news channels including NTV, CNN, and CNBC. That makes him notable. Here are some links of his appearances in reliable media outlets: [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tacmocc (talk • contribs) 15:24, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 18:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appearing in media does not grant notability. Geschichte (talk) 06:52, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 18:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ISO/TC 262

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding WP:SIGCOV in independent sources; my WP:BEFORE search turns up plenty of non-independent sources (e.g. [60][61]), but nothing substantial. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 15:44, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 18:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maltego

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn software. Zero independent sources --Altenmann >talk 15:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 18:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Balance My Hormones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant independent coverage and fails to meet the notability for WP:NCORP. - The9Man ^Talk 17:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. - The9Man ^Talk 17:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 17:42, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Klabin Irmãos & Cia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplicated article from Klabin. I suggest a merge as WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, and Brazil. Svartner (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as suggested. Bearian (talk) 02:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thiago Moyses

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject clearly fails in WP:NAUTHOR. Svartner (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Brazil. Svartner (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jun Kokubo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article by a player who only have spells at teams in J League 2 and below in the Japanese league system. Svartner (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Japan. Svartner (talk) 17:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. 108 games in the J2 League, that's a quite different calibre from the junk we have deleted the past year. A thorough WP:JAPANBEFORE (as coined by @Miminity) is needed. Geschichte (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:23, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability - but agree with Geschichte that there could/should be coverage out there. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rishikul Vidyapeeth

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV, fails WP:NSCHOOL ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 17:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 17:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sign of notability, no sources. Zuck28 (talk) 19:34, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Shyam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV, fails WP:GNG ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 17:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, and India. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 17:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Uttar Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Badly written article for a non notable subject. Zuck28 (talk) 19:36, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Kotmale bus crash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA - Routine kinds of news events (including most .. accidents ..) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. XYZ1233212 (talk) 17:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Transportation, and Sri Lanka. XYZ1233212 (talk) 17:20, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this leads (perhaps with other incidents) to action concerned operator fatigue and the like, the it may be notable on its own or as port of that, but at present I have to say delete an unfortunately common (apparently) tragedy. Mangoe (talk) 21:49, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I added it due to the major news coverage it gained both locally and internationally as a WP:DISASTER. Merline303 (talk) 05:02, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Küplüceli Öznur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was nominated for speedy deletion as a blatant hoax, and I want to thank user Kerim Demirkaynak for bringing this to our attention. I removed the speedy deletion template. While I agree that it is probably a hoax, I'm not absolutely sure. I tried to locate sources, and came across [62]. While not suitable as a reliable source, this gives a lot more information about the subject than the Wikipedia article or any of its translations. That could be part of the hoax, but I believe that it warrants a closer look.

Even if not a hoax, this article should be deleted as it doesn't meet general notability standards. Renerpho (talk) 17:04, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, and Women. Renerpho (talk) 17:04, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In User talk:Erdyuksel#re Küplüceli Öznur from February 2011, a few days after the creation of the English article, user Herostratus mentions a (no longer existing?) Turkish Wikipedia article, which apparently had additional content that Herostratus suggested might be used to expand the English article. I don't think anything ever came of that. Renerpho (talk) 17:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
https://eksisozluk.com/entry/176399582 Creator of the article confessed what she did there. Kolhisli (talk) 17:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I was looking for, thanks Kolhisli! English translation at [63]. Renerpho (talk) 17:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've added back the speedy deletion template. This removes all doubts for me. Renerpho (talk) 18:03, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kerim Demirkaynak write on the article talk page that This article seems to be a hoax. The subject does not exist and was created as a joke or trolling by a university student. No verifiable sources exist. What evidence is there to corroborate those details, that the author created it as a joke and that they were a university student? Did they admit to writing the hoax somewhere? Renerpho (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Kolhisli: Any idea what this edit from January 2024 is about? The editor knew that it was a hoax, and they knew details about its inception. That edit was reverted 3 days later. Renerpho (talk) 18:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The information in this edit contradicts the information in the eksisozluk link I posted, since it was admitted that the wikipedia article was created by high school students. However, the same student may have later studied at Boğaziçi University and spread the prank among the students of Boğaziçi University. https://tr.linkedin.com/posts/mkadirtan_k%C3%BCpl%C3%BCceli-%C3%B6znurun-hikayesini-biliyor-musunuz-activity-7328831347366559745-kCqE Kolhisli (talk) 18:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh. I hate hoaxes. Renerpho (talk) 18:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poetry and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I mean, look. For individual statements of fact, we aim for 99.3% confidence that it's true. That's the best we can humanly do. That is not met by facts of which it can be said "most probably true" let alone "could be true" or "might not be false". So, "While I agree that it is probably a hoax, I'm not absolutely sure" is um well short of the confidence we need to state a fact, let alone keep a whole article. The statement admitting guilt by the hoaxers, above, is pretty damning. It could itself be a hoax, but I doubt it. Finally, the Turks deleted their article in 2017. While that doesn't prove anything, it's not an endorsement for the article existing here if the Turks themselves don't want it. Herostratus (talk) 18:36, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I agree. I've added back the speedy deletion template. Finding a source from close to the article's inception, with information that was not present in the article, was enough to cast doubts for me. It seems that all of that came from the Turkish article, which was longer than the English one. I've since found an archived version of that here. Renerpho (talk) 18:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Telangana Gaddar Film Awards of 2024

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Unreliable sources, mentions of winners, but nothing in-depth about the year itself. Even the main award page is likely not notable. Apparently, I do not have permission to redirect as an WP:ATD so here we are. CNMall41 (talk) 16:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Awards, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 16:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep It is linked to notable article of Telangana Gaddar Film Awards the 1st ediiton, stop your non sense. I dont understand why you editors waste time of yours and others by nominating every new article for deletion. Stop your non sense going forward. It is common sense if academy awards are notable, the 1st edition is notable. Dont you have common sense. The article is widely covered by all media houses and it is highly notable than academy awards.Sukshmadarshinisrilanka (talk) 07:45, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is linked to notable article of Telangana Gaddar Film Awards the 1st ediiton, stop your non sense. I dont understand why you editors waste time of yours and others by nominating every new article for deletion. Stop your non sense going forward. It is common sense if academy awards are notable, the 1st edition is notable. Dont you have common sense. The article is widely covered by all media houses and it is highly notable than academy awards. Sukshmadarshinisrilanka (talk) 07:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First, I would ask that you read WP:CIVIL. After that, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable. As far as the main award, I do not believe it is notable so I will be recommending that for deletion as well. As far as this page, I do not see anything in your argument showing how it is notable. Being linked to another page does not show notability (see WP:WALLEDGARDEN). Can you provide the reliable sources you feel show notability? --CNMall41 (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eknath Pawar

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of enough coverage in independent RS per WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR & article contains unsourced claims and promotional tone. Chronos.Zx (talk) 16:42, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Poetry, India, and Maharashtra. Chronos.Zx (talk) 16:42, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional tone is a reason to rewrite not to delete so I disagree with that part, but it lacks any demonstrated significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources so should be deleted for lacking notability. 204.111.137.20 (talk) 17:45, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG and ANYBIO. No significant coverage in secondary reliable sources. Zuck28 (talk) 19:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

General Aviation Inc. Flight 115

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Point 4 of WP:EVENTCRITERIA - Routine kinds of news events (including most .. accidents ..) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:38, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation, Transportation, United States of America, and Tennessee. XYZ1233212 (talk) 16:38, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep or draftify: This article is written in a way that makes it a bit more difficult to comprehend. I think a copyedit may be necessary. There is also a citation error. (These issues can be fixed relatively quickly). I think keeping the article or returning to draft as an WP:ATD to fix these issues and find more sources would be good. 11WB (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Resigned my vote comment above to reflect my edited update from the conversation below. 11WB (talk) 20:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Selectively merge the article's content and reliable references to Nashville International Airport § Accidents and incidents as WP:ATD (although already mentioned at the target): This is a WP:ROUTINE aviation accident lacking WP:LASTING effects; attempted WP:BEFORE search for sources with WP:SIGCOV has gone nowhere. EditorGirlAL07 (talk) 11:32, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is there are literally no reliable sources available to cite for this accident. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep It is not a medium size aircraft and just because it has only 2 fatalities doesn't mean it can't be notable. I found this website talking about it in 2016.

https://www.pilotsofamerica.com/community/threads/maybe-someone-can-learn-something-from-this.96151/

However, I will admit I can't find many sources, so if someone can make a good response then I will change my vote to delete. Zaptain United (talk) 16:12, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree for the most part on the notability. For the actual way it is written/formatted however, I believe a rewrite or many corrections are necessary (capitalization, spacing etc). I chose draftify for this and to find more sources. 11WB (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should choose weak keep as draftify could lead to this article just being deleted since the other editor voted delete. We could still improve this article without needing to make it a draft. Zaptain United (talk) 20:08, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you make a good point there. I prefer to vote for keeping an article if it can be improved and is notable, which I think this one could be. I'll make weak keep my primary choice and draft as an WP:ATD. 11WB (talk) 20:14, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. None of the sources are appropriate - (1) is a Reddit thread(!), (2) is a Youtube video, (3) appears to be a WP:SPS, (4) is another Youtube video, and (5) is a transcript of the cockpit voice recorder, which is a primary source and confers no notability. And searching for information on this accident turns up no other content, either for "General Aviation Inc. Flight 115" or "General Aviation Flight 115". I'd ordinarily suggest a redirect to the airport's accidents-and-incidents section as suggested by EditorGirlAL07 above, but there are literally no reliable sources with which to cite it if it was there. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reham Rafiq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn’t meet notability guidelines for actors, it also lacks independent sources with in-depth analysis of her work. Chronos.Zx (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Dance, Film, and Pakistan. Chronos.Zx (talk) 16:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kateryna Polunina

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been marked as requiring additional citations for verification since June 2021 and still only has one PDF draw sheet as a source. The person themselves had a very minor tennis career reaching world 518 in singles and world 510 in doubles at their peak and winning one extremely low level ITF doubles title. As such she fails GNG. On top of that I can find no SIGCOV for her and I would presume if there was any it would have been found and added in the four years since the needs additional citations tag was added to the page. The only thing I could find was a short bio for someone with the same name on a meet the coaches type page at a Chinese tennis academy but that person has a different date of birth to that which is listed on the Wikipedia page. Anxioustoavoid (talk) 16:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Women, Tennis, and Ukraine. Anxioustoavoid (talk) 16:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, the ukranian version of this article is the same one, but in ukranian, so i think that there is not much we can do to make it a better article. Haddad Maia fan (talk) 13:10, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Brooking

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-league footballer. At least eight references here are primary sources. Uhooep (talk) 15:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:38, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:23, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Two half-decent sources about Bafana, not enough. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 11:26, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New Star Books

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Three years have passed since a refund following a soft delete. This article still does not meet NCORP guidelines. Dege31 (talk) 15:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Business, Companies, and Canada. Dege31 (talk) 15:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: GNG pass. Discussed in multiple published works, including:

The Perilous Trade: Book Publishing in Canada, 1946-2006 (2012)
Publishing Lives: Interviews with Independent Book Publishers in the Pacific Northwest and British Columbia (1996)
The Globe and Mail, "New Star Books to wind down, publisher cites BC Arts Council funding issues", 29 January 2025
Publishers Weekly, "Vancouver’s New Star Books Ceases Acquisitions", 29 January 2025
Quill and Quire, "New Star Books to close" 16 January 2025 (Quill & Quire)

More can likely be found in the depths of Newspapers.com. MediaKyle (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amundsen Girls Soccer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

High school sports teams are generally not notable unless there is widespread coverage on a national level, which is not the case here. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Football, and Illinois. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 15:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sadly it's a decent little article but the sourcing is just not here to support a youth football club per WP:YOUNGATH. SportingFlyer T·C 15:31, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Amundsen High School#Athletics – Where the team is mentioned. Svartner (talk) 17:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Giant Snowman 11:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Redirect as per SporingFlyer and Svartner. RedPatch (talk) 11:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:23, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lane Tech Girls Soccer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

High school sports teams are generally not notable unless there is widespread coverage on a national level, which is not the case here. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Football, and Illinois. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick ⚓ (talk) 15:19, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Lane Tech College Prep High School#Athletics – Where the team is mentioned. Svartner (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Giant Snowman 11:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
'Redirect as per above. RedPatch (talk) 11:29, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:23, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School that fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage found. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and United States of America. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 13:10, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Graduate Program in Public Management. It appears the Institute for Policy Studies is now defunct. Nayyn (talk) 22:54, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm not sure this center became the Graduate Program in Public Management. This page says Known since 2012 as the Johns Hopkins Institute for Health and Social Policy at the Bloomberg School of Public Health, the Institute’s roots go back to 1962. In that year, the Center for Metropolitan Planning was founded at Johns Hopkins University. That center evolved to become the Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies, founded in 1987. In 2012, our organization got a new name and a new institutional home: the Johns Hopkins Institute for Health and Social Policy, based in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. So this is a center in a department in a school in a college. Perhaps Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health would be a better redirect target? Cheers, Suriname0 (talk) 05:10, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Korzeń

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is virtually unsourced, as none of the references or links in it have any mention of the person (that I could find, and there's not a lot of text). Same goes for plwiki, where this was translated from. A Google search also brought back virtually nothing besides Wikipedia, Wikidata and Commons. A bunch of Polish pages mention the name, but I couldn't find any with info on this particular person, including any pages relating to the Polonia Restituta award. ☀ Hijérovīt | ^þⰁ_č 11:56, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Poland. Shellwood (talk) 12:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:05, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:05, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - poor sourcing, and only win the second highest award. Bearian (talk) 02:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobs Edo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. This article reads like a résumé and is self-promoting. Lacks significant secondary sources, references are mainly to his own book, his own LinkedIn article, and a few press releases or small niche news sites, not independent coverage. Possible WP:COI as well, the main contributor to this article has only written this article. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 14:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Nigeria. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 14:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shalini Passi

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage on reliable resources. Fails WP:NACTOR. LKBT (talk) 09:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Women, Entertainment, India, and Delhi. LKBT (talk) 09:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Her only accomplishment is who she married. Not notable. — Maile (talk) 17:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay Passi

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable topic. Unsourced article and claims no Notability. fails WP:BIO, WP:GNG. LKBT (talk) 09:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, India, and Delhi. LKBT (talk) 09:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:PROMO There is no substance - just his education, his personal life, and his awards. Why someone would get an award for "highest taxpayer in India" just seems like he didn't have a very good financial advisor — Maile (talk) 17:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pride Season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article, based entirely on primary sources rather than reliable ones, which misdefines its topic as being much more exclusive to a single country than it actually is.
"Pride season", meaning the part of the year during which LGBTQ Pride events are typically held, is in no way a uniquely Canadian thing -- it's not even the least bit difficult to find sources using the term "Pride season" in American, European and Asian contexts -- but this article, as written, posits it as a uniquely Canadian phenomenon, uses primary sources rather than media coverage for referencing, and basically just provides a short summary of the history of LGBTQ Pride in Canada and an incomplete list of some cities that have pride events (but a considerable number of pride events in Canada have their own Wikipedia articles already, so why the list wouldn't be linking to them is a mystery).
No prejudice against the creation of a better-referenced and more detailed overview article about LGBTQ Pride in Canada, if desired, but "Pride Season" isn't the correct title for that as it isn't a uniquely Canadian phenomenon or even a uniquely Canadian term for it, and I can't justify just moving this article to that title without major improvement either — but just adding internationalized content to this article wouldn't be a useful alternative, since it's far from clear that the concept of "Pride season" would actually need a separate article from the base concept of LGBTQ Pride at all. Bearcat (talk) 13:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 13:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:32, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Absolutely hilarious that this is made out to be just a Canadian thing. We use this term in the US too, and plenty of places hold major Pride events outside of just Pride month. I don't know if there are any other country-specific Pride articles like the one suggested, but I don't think it's necessary either: LGBTQ people in Canada#Festivities and List of LGBTQ events#Canada seem sufficient. Reywas92^Talk 21:50, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dice Ailes

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. The sources are mostly shallow entertainment blogs, interviews, and promo-style coverage; nothing that qualifies as significant, independent reporting. There’s no major chart success, no major awards, and no in-depth analysis from reliable media. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 13:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Nigeria. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 13:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Smada

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. The sources cited are mostly low-tier entertainment blogs, interviews, and routine coverage that don’t provide in-depth, independent analysis needed to establish lasting notability. There’s no evidence of significant chart success, major awards, or critical acclaim from reliable outlets. As it stands, the article reads more like a press kit than an encyclopedia entry. It's probably WP:TOOSOON. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 12:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 12:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 12:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: "Papilo" chart entry on Nigeria's TurnTable Charts.--Afí-afeti (talk) 19:54, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Transformer effect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mutual inductance and Inductive coupling already have much more information here. The transformer effect certainly is not the WP:COMMONNAME for this, either. DeemDeem52 (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Engineering, and Technology. DeemDeem52 (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not delete - what are you suggesting should happen? Christian75 (talk) 12:23, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the nom that the term is rarely used. It refers to the effect in which an emf is induced by a time-varying magnetic field. (see [64] and [65]). It is usually discussed in electrodynamics textbooks under the topic Faraday's law of induction. Given this, I propose that we merge to Faraday's law of induction, and create a redirect from the more common term, transformer emf, to that page. The coverage at the target article should also be expanded. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 17:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've added discussion about transformer emf to Faraday's law of induction. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 16:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as suggested. Bearian (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Transformer. There is nothing useful in this article to merge, it is high-school physics without sources. The name is not in common use, and I suspect is a literal translation from another language. It seems to have been created much earlier in WP history when the policy about what to include and verification was more open. I would also be OK with a simple delete, as a Google search mainly brings up pages on Transformer-syle robots. Ldm1954 (talk) 09:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Transformer, as there is not any brilliant prose or even cited content worth preserving via merge. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 17:31, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Technically, transformer seems like a wrong target. In those sources that care to define "transformer effect", e.g. this, it includes any effect from changing magnetic flux to a stationary circuit, similar to transformer emf. In particular, it includes the interaction between a circuit and a moving magnet, which is unrelated to what happens in a transformer. That's why I suggested Faraday's law of induction above. If we decide that it generally does not have a well-defined meaning, then we should delete it or link to Electromagnetic induction, which is the broadest article in the topic area. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 18:05, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would be fine with either of those as redirect destinations. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 23:31, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Inductance#Mutual inductance, where Mutual induction also redirects. In 2006 the first sentence of the first version of this article read The Transformer Effect, or Mutual Induction, describes one of the processes by which an electromotive force (e.m.f.) is induced. So it was meant as an article on what we usually refer to as mutual induction. StarryGrandma (talk) 00:45, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Destinyokhiria 💬

12:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vera Cherepanova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Not supported by reliable and significant sources. More than half of the current sources ([66][67][68][69][70][71]) are primary. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Women, and ~~United Arab Emirates~~. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I draftified the page but the author moved it back to mainspace without improvement. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:54, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Not sure about any connection to the UAE? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. I meant the United States. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:06, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oho! Makes more sense. In any case, I don't think she passes WP:GNG, so Delete Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 13:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

T Dollar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. There is no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources; the few references provided are largely routine announcements, press release-type content, or from sites that do not meet WP’s reliability standards. The subject has not received major awards, charted nationally in a verifiable and sustained way, or been the subject of in-depth critical analysis. The article lacks the substantive sourcing required to justify a standalone entry and appears to exist primarily for promotional purposes. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 12:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 12:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Nigeria. $Destinyokhiria 💬$ 12:55, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:56, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom $Destinyokhiria 💬$ 12:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Asia Market Wrap

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article unreferenced for nearly 20 years, lacks WP:SIGCOV. Previously bundled with Market Wrap, which was then blared in 2023, and European Closing Bell. Coeusin (talk) 12:17, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Finance, Economics, and Asia. Coeusin (talk) 12:17, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning redirect to CNBC (as there currently is no Market Wrap to redirect to). Added some facts and references, as there was no mention of any WP:BEFORE search, but it is mainly passing mentions (though my search was cursory at best; Wikipedia Library/EBSCOhost and Internet Archive). Please ping me if additional sources are found. Cielquiparle (talk) 22:41, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Archaeological Society of British Columbia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about an organization. As always, organizations are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:ORGDEPTH on substantive and significant WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about them -- but this cites no sources at all, and the only footnote that's ever previously been in the article was an issue of the self-published newsletter of one of its own regional chapters, which is not an independent third-party source.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have any referencing. Bearcat (talk) 11:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Archaeology, and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 11:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I dug through the depths of Newspapers.com and Archive.org attempting to scrape together enough coverage for GNG, but I don't believe it can be met. There is a decent amount of local coverage available through Newspapers.com, but not enough to build an article on. Ironically, the Underwater Archaeological Society of British Columbia would probably meet GNG based on coverage I found, but not this one. There is also no suitable article to redirect this to, that I can see. MediaKyle (talk) 21:29, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jax Fox

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this article meets notability requirements. Aside from them being the first transgender politician (which is now quite common in Tasmania) the article doesn't have much significant information that would warrant being an article on its own. It also heavily relies on primary sources. DeadlyRampage26 (Chat) 11:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Politicians. DeadlyRampage26 (Chat) 11:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 11:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Might this deletion request have anything to do with the "Distaste for the Greens" you have in your userpage infobox? Lord Beesus (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An editor's personal opinions are not to be considered in deletion discussions. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 14:38, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frida Ghitis

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently nominated for deletion by Scientelensia, who's rationale still holds true: "is of no relevance or notability, reads like a CV rather than a Wikipedia page." Currently only primary sources. My searches turned up the same thing as Oaktree's during the prior AfD: "I can only bring up articles or opinion pieces written by this person, nothing about them... I suppose if more book reviews are found, could have a chance at AUTHOR, but I couldn't find any." Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Journalism. Shellwood (talk) 11:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: why was this recreated? ―Howard • 🌽³³ 15:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The last AfD was closed as a "soft delete" which equates as a "prod", which was contested. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article is about a notable political commentator fitting the criteria of

WP:CREATIVE. All of the sources are secondary, not primary, sources. Among other things, none of the references are written by the subject of the article. While work can be done to improve the article, deleting it is not the appropriate remedy for any concerns. Coining (talk) 01:58, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akossi Gnalo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 11:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 11:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Togo at the 1988 Summer Olympics#Athletics – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 13:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Question Do we know if this is the same Akossi Gnalo who was a claimant in Wiyao Gnandakpa & 8 others vs. Togo (2015)? Interesting story if so. Case: ECOWAS pdf (opens in browser), IHRDA caselaw weblink, local news (aLome.com). Kingsif (talk) 14:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Henri Ndinga

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 10:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 10:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Per lack of a clear redirect target. Svartner (talk) 13:22, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Svartner, clear redirect target would be Republic of the Congo at the 1988 Summer Olympics, for his first Olympic participation. --Habst (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
He participated in the 1984 edition as well. I base myself on what was decided in previous AfDs. Svartner (talk) 19:33, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A three-time medalist at the Central African Games, including two gold and the title of Central African champion in both the 100m and 200m, two of the most famous events ([72]). That strongly indicates that coverage exists. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Youssef El Deeb

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was nominated for deletion by Bearcat, part of their rationale was, "WP:BLP of a media entrepreneur, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for media figures. As always, founders of television channels are not automatically entitled to Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on their sourceability -- but this is referenced entirely to a mixture of primary sources and glancing namechecks of the subject's existence in coverage about other things, with no evidence shown at all of any GNG-worthy coverage with him as its subject." Although re-written, this still applies. The second part of Bearcat's rationale dealt with COI editing, which has only been exacerbated by the most recent edits of a blatant COI/UPE editor. I also agree with Bearian's assessment in the prior AfD. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Egypt, and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 11:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – This subject meets the criteria of WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Youssef El Deeb is not simply a "founder"; he is a significant media figure in the Arab world. His creation of Fatafeat TV — later acquired by Discovery — is a landmark event in Arab media, widely covered in **independent** and **reliable** sources such as *Deadline*, *The Hollywood Reporter*, and *BroadcastPro ME* (not primary or promotional outlets).
He also held senior executive roles at MBC and Rotana, and his creative work in film and TV has been recognized with awards — further reinforcing his notability under WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENT.
The current version of the article uses multiple **independent** and **significant** sources that focus on El Deeb himself, not just passing mentions. This satisfies the sourcing standard under GNG.
The deletion rationale cites past versions, but the article has been substantially rewritten and resourced. The presence of COI/UPE concerns is not, in itself, grounds for deletion — per WP:NOTCLEAN, what matters is whether the article **now** meets policy. It does.
Editors are welcome to continue improving neutrality or trimming promotional tone, but deletion would discard verifiable coverage of a genuinely notable figure in Arab media.

~~~~ Vlodiker Chimok (talk) 11:50, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the above editor is either a COI or UPE editor.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:42, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. While this is a reliable source, I had to scroll through all 7 paragraphs and multiple ads to find the producer mentioned as a literal afterthought. The rest of the sources are less than reliable or more passing mentions. There's a myth about producers that they are rare, creative performers of some kind. They're business people; some are notable, most are not. I feel I have to repeat myself that we are not LinkedIn. Bearian (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Only passing mentions from press releases. Highly promotional. WP is not LinkedIn. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 16:07, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

*:* Keep – The deletion arguments rely on outdated or incorrect information. Youssef El Deeb is a notable figure in Arab media, having founded Fatafeat TV, sold to Discovery, and produced award-winning films. Multiple independent, reliable sources focus specifically on him.Preceding !vote struck as duplicate !vote. Leaving the rest as comments.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- Claims of promotional tone or COI editing do not justify deletion. If there are issues, they should be fixed by neutral editing, not removal.
- The this is not Linkedin argument ignores real-world impact and reliable coverage. Deletion would erase a notable media personality with clear public recognition.
- Please evaluate the article based on verifiable facts and reliable sources, not on assumptions or editor speculation.
Vlodiker Chimok (talk) 16:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudo-secularism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable term not used by anybody except Sangh Parivar and their supporters. The article on Sangh Parivar can include some details about this topic but a separate article is not really needed. Capitals00 (talk) 10:30, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:32, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - are we a soapbox now? Bearian (talk) 02:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Expand and globalize this article. Great achievement (talk) 06:48, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Investopia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing to indicate that the subject is notable. This is a UAE government program created in 2021. There is no independent reliable news coverage of this program. The coverage is solely by news outlets that are propaganda outlets for the UAE government or are prohibited from reporting in any critical or nuanced way on this government program. Thenightaway (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Arab Emirates. Shellwood (talk) 15:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep and improve - Based on global reach and influence as well as participation by notable individuals. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 17:52, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- What about this program that has existed since 2021 indicates that it has "global reach" and "influence"? There is certainly nothing in this article, which is written like an advertisement, that suggests any such thing. If it's so influential and has such global reach, where is the RS coverage on this organization? Paying notable people to give a speech at a conference does not make the conference notable. Thenightaway (talk) 19:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agent Extensibility Protocol

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refs added are only passing mentions, lack WP:SIGCOV. Still fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 10:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:29, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've added another source for good measure. More to be found searching RFC 2741. ~Kvng (talk) 14:26, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, these don't look notable to me. A quick Google Scholar search reveals that the topic is obscure and only mentioned in articles with a tiny number of citations. Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep By doing research RFC 2741 the article is notable--Unclethepoter (talk) 21:49, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
An RFC doesn't meet WP:RS and is likely primary. Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. On a pure sourcing basis, IETF and CRC Press are definitely reliable. guninvalid (talk) 18:34, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IETF is primary. The CRC book is not well cited so I am not sure it should be used to support notability. Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:16, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:PROMO and WP:AUDIENCE. Regarding notability, the sources that were provided are obscure (not well cited) scientific works; "multiple independent, significant, and independent of the subject" does not appear to be met. Merge to Simple Network Management Protocol is a reasonable alternative to deletion. Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:01, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of McDonnell Douglas MD-80 operators

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article had only two citations, both of which were unreliable sources per WP:PLANESPOTTERS. Only reason I didn't remove the second citation was because I didn't spot it. So in essence, this list article, which contains details such as numbers of aircraft in operation or formerly in operation, is completely unsourced, with the only assistance for the reader being to go to the linked articles - which doesn't count as sourcing per WP:CIRCULAR Danners430 (talk) 11:23, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Lists. Danners430 (talk) 11:23, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you also have Airfleets [73], and at least SimpleFlying and BusinessInsider blog posts showing which airlines operate the plane: [74] [75] So it's not really a trivial/NLIST failing topic if we can agree on a proper source. There may be more in my old books in storage as well. SportingFlyer T·C 11:54, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Airfleets has been in multiple RSNs over the years where it's also been listed as unreliable, as it's basically the same as Planespotters. Simple Flying is a deprecated source, but Business Insider would work. If we can find sources, then obviously there's no problem keeping the article... unfortunately, often it takes an AfD for such action to take place!

And for the record, yes I did make a quick search for sources myself... but as I'm not really an aviation-inclined person, I couldn't find anything substantial. Danners430 (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are at least three books directly on the planes published at various times, but I can't access their insides. SportingFlyer T·C 12:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think if we're wanting to source current lists of operators and numbers though we probably need more recent sources Danners430 (talk) 12:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Very few operators still fly this plane. SportingFlyer T·C 17:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Flying is NOT a reliable source WP:SIMPLEFLYING Protoeus (talk) 23:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:56, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - needing improvement (i.e. reliable references) is never a reason to delete an article. Fully referencing the list is something that should be achievable. Mjroots (talk) 09:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes opening an AfD is the only way to get an article improved... Like I said above, I've done a search for sources, but haven't been able to find anything substantial. Danners430 (talk) 09:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep We can clearly source American operators from my source search. See [76] [77] We can also source other carriers - I picked two at random and there's lots out there, but nothing that is a clear "slam dunk" (like say the BBC) because this is a niche topic with niche sources. I do not know what is in this book. This looks self-published unfortunately. The problem is we can absolutely source this and it's encyclopedic but there's not going to be one source out there that isn't a niche aviation source... SportingFlyer T·C 10:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moujhed Fahid Khalifa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. All the sources are databases/results listing. Arab Athletics Championships is a lower tier competition that wouldn't meet WP:NATH. LibStar (talk) 02:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Iraq. LibStar (talk) 02:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Specifically, today the Arab Championships have a C-class rating from WA. Geschichte (talk) 13:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Geschichte, do you have an opinion on notability of this athlete? LibStar (talk) 06:43, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: inelig for soft deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 08:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – The athlete has a consistent career and not just a random Olympic competition. Svartner (talk) 16:31, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment From some forums, he does seem to be at least the best-performing all time track and field athlete from Iraq, do we call that best? To the point of searches, his name has been transliterated from Arabic in various other ways - and I'm not entirely sure the (OR?) Arabic rendering at our article is accurate. In quick search I've seen the first name also spelt Moujahed/Moujahid/Mujihid (generally, it does have a vowel in the middle), and the middle name spelt Fahd and Fahad. The Olympics website has him as Mujihid Fahad Khalifa [78]. Kingsif (talk) 09:23, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- What Arabic names have you used to search? BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:33, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  I've been using English Kingsif (talk) 21:44, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Order of precedence in Northern Ireland

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIRECTORY
in 2016 the departments of the Northern Ireland Executive were restructured from 12 to 9 departments, but the article still uses the old structure for permanent secretaries at the bottom, while it uses the names of the current politicians at the top, so this combination of names has never existed at any point
many of the sources are actually related to the Order of precedence in the United Kingdom and make no mention of this order of precdence Landpin (talk) 09:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Landpin (talk) 09:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Order of precedence in England and Wales, not Order of precedence in the United Kingdom Landpin (talk) 09:31, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:36, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Paris, Texas (Lana Del Rey song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. No notability outside of album reviews, and only some minor chart placements. Sricsi (talk) 09:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Sricsi (talk) 09:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Did You Know That There's a Tunnel Under Ocean Blvd: Perfect candidate for a redirect per WP:ATD-R. The nomination seems correct in that this song lacks notability distinct from the album, with no evidence of any individualized SIGCOV. Redirecting to the album is the best solution. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:08, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Barnes (soccer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject only played collegiate soccer and had a non-notable collegiate soccer coaching career. WP:GNG Raskuly (talk) 05:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia. Raskuly (talk) 05:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:19, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I found [[79]] and [[80]] which are each feature stories providing significant coverage of the subject. Let'srun (talk) 19:08, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 08:55, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Let'srun. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – The Buffalo News reports show in-depth coverage about him. There are almost never any third-party sources about American minor league football/soccer players, and this is not the case here. Svartner (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

B. R. Deepak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted because the subject doesn’t meet Wikipedia’s rules for notable academics or public figures. It appears to be written by the subject himself, raising concerns about autobiographical bias. His h-index and i10-index are much lower than what is normally expected for a professor in the Humanities. The only proof that he won a major Chinese award is a dead link, and no other reliable sources confirm it. Charlie (talk) 05:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and India. Charlie (talk) 05:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems feebly notable hence the article should be trimmed in a neutral form and also lodged with some more notable news link.Almandavi (talk) 05:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I could only find three offline reviews of his edited volumes, but the Special Book Award of China is a notable and significant international award that may be enough for WP:PROF#C2. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Found a few live links about the subject winning the award - The Hindu, and The Indian Express. Charlie (talk) 07:07, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Aujero Small

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Culver City, California is a small city, in which none of their incumbent Councilmembers have Wikipedia pages. This article has WP:NPOV issues, as well as WP:BLP issues related to sourcing. None of the sourcing is really exceptional, with a combination of sources that Wikipedia does not commonly rely on, purely local coverage or mentions in passing, or interviews of some kind. This all comes in addition to the fact that the page has not been updated in multiple years, and there isn't even any information about Small no longer being on the City Council. I will continue to try to improve this page during this discussion, but I think this is the likely outcome. PickleG13 (talk) 04:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 June 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:01, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Culver City is not large enough to confer an automatic presumption of notability on its mayors in advance of properly establishing passage of WP:NPOL #2 — but this is referenced too heavily to primary sources that aren't support for notability (e.g. content self-published by organizations he was directly involved with, IMDb, etc.), even some of the reliable sources just glancingly namecheck his existence in the process of being fundamentally about someone or something else, and after you discount all of that there aren't very many sources left that are actually building a WP:GNG case. Also, even the mayoralty section is leaning far more on appointments to county or regional government committees — but we need to see coverage about his work on those bodies, not just verification of his membership, to deem him notable for any of that either. Bearcat (talk) 14:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I do not believe that the size of a jurisdiction matters to whether a mayor (or any other local elected official) should have a stand-alone page. What matters is whether there is enough coverage to illustrate the impact of the local official had in their jurisdiction. While in practice, subjects representing larger jurisdictions may have more reliable source coverage, that is not a given. I would not be opposed to a future redirect to Culver City#Government if there were a list of mayors there (perhaps in a collapsable table), but as there is not one there currently, there is not enough coverage as Bearcat describes to keep the article. --Enos733 (talk) 17:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kat Williams

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable singer. Participating in America's Got Talent is not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Found a little local interest but nothing significant. Asheville singer does something normal type thing. Despite the claim on the page, she was not nominated for that regional Emmy. (not the Mississippi Mass Choir Katrina Williams) duffbeerforme (talk) 03:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability has plainly not been established. I think it could return to draftspace to allow for more work, but coverage is simply not extensive and has not expanded since appearance on television show. PickleG13 (talk) 04:21, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and North Carolina. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I deprodded this because she has a claim to notability and a fairly strong fan base; see "beloved" and "praised". Bearian (talk) 15:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Two gig announcements that contain the same false information as here. She was not nominated for that Regional Emmy. These two sources lack factchecking and just repeat from her promotional bio. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 08:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Wahlgren

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. I couldnt find sources online about this subject hence doesn't meet WP:SIGCOV. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and United States of America. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and California. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:08, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no independent WP:SIGCOV. GoldRomean (talk) 21:31, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep/comment I took the opportunity and edited the page. Used proposed edits and links to at least give it a chance because I believe that people who were notable when articles were not posted on the internet widely or when the digital age wasn't booming, deserves a chance. Also the article is very old so it passed all the screening for years. We can remove some parts though. AppleBoosted (talk) 21:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 08:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan Townships Association

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disclosure, I just rev-del'ed significant portion as a copyright violation and because this was already once tagged for CSD, I think it needs more than PROD. I can find actions the association took and naming of officers, but no ORG level sourcing to establish notability and no viable ATD. Star Mississippi 03:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, United States of America, and Michigan. Star Mississippi 03:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This does not seem to meet notability, and the type of organization that it has does not seem to merit notability on a general level. PickleG13 (talk) 04:26, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:17, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest merge into Administrative divisions of Michigan#Township as there is really apparently very little to say about it other than it exists and has nearly every township in the state as a member. Mangoe (talk) 01:19, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Agent 007 (talk) 08:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Railway Transport of Ukraine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article PRODded with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Article dePRODded by artucle creator with reason "Wikipedia talk:Notability (academic journals)#RfC on notability criteria. It's just an essay, not a guideline. Therefore, invoking this essay fails as a rationale for a proposed deletion. NJournals may be an essay only, but GNG most definitively is not. PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals, Transportation, and Ukraine. Randykitty (talk) 08:09, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Apologies to Randykitty; I concur that WP:GNG is a relevant rationale. I think I may have been hasty in translating this article from uk:Залізничний транспорт України (журнал) to English before checking whether it would meet the GNG on English Wikipedia. Although it is frequently mentioned in independent, secondary, reliable sources, and used as a reliable source in other journals, meeting the WP:SIGCOV requirement is going to be more difficult than I expected, at least from English-language sources. It may be possible to do so with Ukrainian-language sources, but the digital, autotranslatable sources in Ukrainian that I can find about this journal might not be enough. It probably would require an editor who is better at reading Ukrainian texts in printed works or PDF files without machine translations than I can. Anyone reading this who could, or knows someone who could, is welcome to try! But if not, might it be a better idea to Merge the relevant contents to Ukrainian Railways#Science and education section for now? It seems the best place to keep it until (if ever) this journal merits a stand-alone article. Good day, NLeeuw (talk) 09:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3 Kings (jazz trio)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We can fold everything into the Bill Clinton and Randy Goodrum pages. There's not much we can't convey there. This also happens to be an example cited at WP:SIGCOV, though that isn't the main rationale. Bremps... 07:56, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Arkansas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:06, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WAYF

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This repeater for the WayFM Network has had an article repeatedly redirected and recreated (the latter often by IPs), and even an A7 deletion. There is no notability here that I can descern and this should be re-redirected back to WayFM Network (and with some sort of protection to avoid any further recreation) — but throughout all this there has never been any AfD for this topic (the deleted version did have a PROD attempt at one point), so one is necessary (given all the contested BLARs). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Christianity, and Florida. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see a fair number of Google hits mentioning "WAY-FM", but no significant coverage. Being listed on some directory, random fan site, or streaming service does not establish notability. Donald Albury 14:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to WayFM Network There is no shot at standalone notability for this facility. Of the four early WayFM stations, the only two that have articles have them because they were sold on to other owners. If you are a repeater of a Christian radio network, sometimes even if you have limited local programming (and that's less common), there is often not enough material for GNG. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 23:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GNU coding standards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any independent, significant coverage of these standards; suggest a merge to GNU Project. The one book cited doesn't seem to mention these standards by name, so it seems the sentence they support are OR. Toadspike [Talk] 06:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Toadspike [Talk] 06:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The GNU Coding Standards are the subject of a full-length article in Linux Journal ("What's GNU? GNU Coding Standards" by Arnold Robbins, No. 16es, August 1995). They're also referenced in dozens of programming books; among those with more than passing mentions are Advanced Linux Programming (Mark L. Mitchell, Alex Samuel, Jeffrey Oldham, 2001), The Art of Unix Programming (Eric S. Raymond, 2003), The Definitive Guide to GCC (William von Hagen, 2004), and Code Reading (Diomidis Spinellis, 2003). —Psychonaut (talk) 23:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gnits standards

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see any independent coverage of these standards; suggest a merge or redirect to GNU Project (I would suggest GNU coding standards, but that doesn't seem notable either...) Toadspike [Talk] 06:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Toadspike [Talk] 06:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into GNU Coding Standards (reliable sources for which are discussed on its own AfD page). —Psychonaut (talk) 23:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amita Zamaana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable producer. Article only features sources from unreliable sites (e.g. IMDb) and other sources do not even mention the subject in question. Fails WP:NPRODUCER. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:54, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Canada. CycloneYoris ^talk! 05:54, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article sources Playback as a reliable news source for the Canadian television industry. The subject is mentioned in 2 separate articles as a producer and writer for different reasons in each. The subject is also mentioned in The Canadian Public Broadcaster's news articles as a producer. Along with IMDB which lists the numerous internationally broadcast television series credits of the subject, the subject is mentioned in the all 7 sources. Gale Buckthorne (talk) 12:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NPRODUCER. Could not find any reliable secondary sourcing to confirm her notability. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 16:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will Bates

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The highest level the subject played in was the third tier of American soccer before presumably retiring from the sport. While Bates was drafted and signed by the Seattle Sounders, a first tier team, he never made a single appearance. WP:GNG Raskuly (talk) 05:49, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington. Raskuly (talk) 05:49, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 08:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails in GNG. RossEvans19 (talk) 01:55, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Bashti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The highest level the subject played in was for the reserve affiliate of Atlanta United before retiring from the sport. WP:GNG Raskuly (talk) 05:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, California, and Georgia (U.S. state). Raskuly (talk) 05:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 08:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Beau Harrison

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content is very sparse and does not suggest significant coverage. I have worked extensively on articles related to the White House Office and Harrison has vexed me because he does not appear to have much coverage; even searching his name on Google News largely returns articles about his wife. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article is a stub but presents accurate information about a White House official with proper sourcing.
User01938 (talk) 05:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Barron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The highest level the subject played was the third tier of the US soccer pyramid and his career was brief. WP:GNG Raskuly (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, Canada, California, and Pennsylvania. Raskuly (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 08:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No WP:SIGCOV in refs, so fails WP:SPORTCRIT. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails in WP:GNG. Svartner (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG, no reliable secondary sourcing to confirm notability. m a MANÍ^{1990(talk | contribs)} 16:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The article says he played for the Orange County Blues in the USL Championship, which is the second tier in American soccer. Notaoffensivename (talk) 06:15, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It was a third tier team when he played for it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Orange_County_SC_seasons Raskuly (talk) 06:28, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops. Sorry about that. Notaoffensivename (talk) 07:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ethiopian Women with Disabilities National Association (EWDNA)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. Of the sources currently in the article: Source 1 is a brief database entry on the organization, not WP:SIGCOV. Source 2 and Source 3 are from partner organizations, not WP:INDY. Source 4 is WP:ORGTRIV coverage; the organization's name is mentioned a few times, but only superficially. Astaire (talk) 04:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Disability, Organizations, and Ethiopia. Astaire (talk) 04:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Surongo 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF: Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The article says that "No formal announcement regarding scripting, casting, or green-lighting has been made" and the film is not even in pre-production. Astaire (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. Astaire (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Raihan Rafi Cinematic Universe Ahammed Saad (talk) 06:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Surongo - As no independent source mentioning the film. - Rht bd (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative proposal: merge with Surongo if the previously mentioned article gets deleted per consensus. Ahammed Saad (talk) 20:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Taandob 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF: Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date. The fact that a sequel was hinted in the first film's end credits is not enough for an article. Astaire (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. Astaire (talk) 04:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Raihan Rafi Cinematic Universe Ahammed Saad (talk) 06:47, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative proposal: merge to Taandob if the previously mentioned article gets deleted per consensus. Ahammed Saad (talk) 20:19, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Taandob - As no independent source mentioning the film.

Rht bd (talk) 17:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Raihan Rafi Cinematic Universe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Massive WP:OR violation. This page suggests the existence of a "cinematic universe" (consisting of just two films by this director), but none of the sources provided in the article refer to it as such. The entire basis for this article seems to be the director posting "WELCOME TO RAIHAN RAFI CINEMATIC UNIVERES💥💥" on social media, which is obviously not WP:INDY. Astaire (talk) 04:06, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film, and Bangladesh. Astaire (talk) 04:06, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename to "Cinematic universe of Raihan Rafi" to avoid WP:OR Ahammed Saad (talk) 06:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how that does anything to avoid the OR issue. The question is whether reliable sources have stated the existence of a "cinematic universe", independent of what the director says. The fact that one of the director's films briefly references another does not justify this long, bloated page. Astaire (talk) 13:17, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No independent source that mention the subject. - Rht bd (talk) 17:08, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
delete 103.75.195.193 (talk) 04:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the nominator stated, this is a "massive WP:OR violation". It also fails WP:GNG. There is zero coverage. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Armaan Mansoor Spin-off

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTALBALL. Complete nonsense about a "rumored film" that "has not been officially announced", with zero sources provided. Astaire (talk) 03:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. Astaire (talk) 03:59, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I wouldn't call it complete nonsense, as with a quick google search I was able to find a source[81], however it does seem too speculative, unless someone can find more reporting about it that would cause the speculation itself to meet WP:GNG. Ike Lek (talk) 06:39, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No independent source that mention the subject. - Rht bd (talk) 17:13, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:HAMMER. Bearian (talk) 02:20, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ahammed Saad (talk) 20:16, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adrianos Facchetti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP article that does not appear to meet Wikipedia's requirements for notability. Sources 1, 2, 3, and 14 are list/database entries. The latter three of those are effectively advertisements. 4 is the subject's own website. 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 13 are passing mentions. 7 and 8 don't actually mention the subject at all, unless I'm missing something. 12 is a press release. My searches online did not yield any in-depth coverage by independent sources. Squeakachu (talk) 03:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Law. Squeakachu (talk) 03:33, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:35, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The Martindale firm profile reference doesn't look great from a reliability standpoint per discussions at RSN. ScalarFactor (talk) 22:54, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Petar Stoyanov (swimmer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 03:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Bulgaria. LibStar (talk) 03:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bulgaria at the 1980 Summer Olympics#Swimming – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COWCAT Games

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Largely mentioned regarding one situation where the dev uncovered some Steam Curator scammers, but this is trivial about the company itself. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:05, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:05, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:36, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guy-Elie Boulingui

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 03:03, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 03:03, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gabon at the 1996 Summer Olympics#Boxing – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Clearly not notable enough for a standalone article, but he's already mentioned at the redirect target. Papaursa (talk) 17:06, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Krasimir Tumanov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 03:01, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Bulgaria. LibStar (talk) 03:01, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bulgaria at the 1980 Summer Olympics#Swimming – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 13:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Per BeanieFan11 sources. Svartner (talk) 21:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He is mentioned in the media under the name "Красимир Туманов" a lot (I'm coming across dozens and dozens of stories mentioning him). Most of the coverage is brief (e.g. this), but some of it goes into some detail such as this (another story on the same event). According to this, he was a multi-time national champion, Balkan champion, and "won the first medal in the history of Bulgarian swimming at a high-ranking competition" – a silver at European championships. He is apparently so well-known there that at a ceremony honoring his 50th anniversary of winning Bulgaria's first swimming medal, the President of Bulgaria was a speaker, and several national awards were given to him. It is inconceivable that a subject like this – honored by the president of his country for his accomplishments 50 years prior – would not have been further covered when he was most active. Regardless, I am sure we have enough on him to write a decent biography here. @Svartner: BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Eel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Coverage is trivial. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom (I had nominated Iikka Keränen previously, which redirect there). IGF interview has a bit on Digital Eel. IgelRM (talk) 06:58, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doublesix

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Sourcing is extremely weak. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

doublesix was a developer that created multiple video games for the PlayStation 3, Xbox 360, PC, iOS and Wii.

https://www.mobygames.com/company/10593/doublesix-video-games-ltd/

Moreover, if this entry is false, then what studio developed Burn Zombie Burn?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burn_Zombie_Burn 2407:C800:432B:D800:5464:9A5D:66B2:F623 (talk) 07:09, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody said the article is false. Merely being true does not make something suitable for inclusion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:02, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Aimé Randrianalijaona

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY. LibStar (talk) 02:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Africa. LibStar (talk) 02:52, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Madagascar at the 1972 Summer Olympics – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 03:01, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blueside

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Kingdom Under Fire is of course notable, but Wikipedia is not a corporate advertising listing. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:38, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BattleGoat Studios

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Originally made by a WP:SPA, suggesting it is WP:PROMO that has survived very long for some reason. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:39, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:39, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:38, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aggro Crab

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Coverage is almost entirely about their games, not the studio themselves. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Companies. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (as author) with sources about the organization:
- Game Developer- more about the studio following the game, focuses on their funding issues among other things.
- GameRant source about the studio's next game and decent depth of studio rather than just Another Crab's Treasure.
- GamesIndustry covering their response to Team17 releasing NFTs.
- GamesRadar+ covering info about the studio and team getting broken in to.
- GamesRadar+ info about the studio discussing changes to a coding application.

Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:38, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These are largely about their video games, and otherwise very WP:TRIVIALCOVERAGE of the studio themselves. There is a clear lack of WP:SIGCOV here. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broadly being about their games should contribute to GNG as coverage is not about a specific game Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:CORPDEPTH, "Sources that describe only a specific topic related to an organization should not be regarded as providing significant coverage of that organization." See also WP:ORGTRIV. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is the coverage about funding, also found at GamesRadar+ not coverage about the organization? Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:50, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd argue that is also trivial coverage. It's just restating one social media post by them. Just because they are an indie darling whose every post gets picked up by game journalists does not imply SIGCOV, as there needs to be substantive discussion about the studio. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:55, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:38, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Currents

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find much of any coverage of this independent news publication. JTtheOG (talk) 01:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and New York. JTtheOG (talk) 01:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aye Aye Moe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bringing this back to AFD 8 years later. WP:NSOCCER has changed and this article fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, Asia, and Myanmar. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to ~~Myanmar women's national football team~~. ITYM "Bringing this back to AfD" not "GNG" above. Cielquiparle (talk) 01:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC) Note: Updating redirect target to List of Myanmar women's international footballers per discussion below. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:04, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads up. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as Cielquiparle stated. The main reason it was kept in 2017 was due to her national team appearances. However, many women's Burmese footballers don't have articles because they do not meet notability criteria (like her). Notaoffensivename (talk) 01:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - There really isn't any harm in keeping it. It isn't promotional, and does list an award she received. Notability could definitely go either way, but why get rid of it? I'd fall back on WP:NTEMP to keep it, even though it only explicitly applies to WP:GNG. - Ike Lek (talk) 06:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, because of how Burmese names work and how common a name Aye Aye Moe is, it seems really tough to determine whether or not she really does meet WP:GNG. Ike Lek (talk) 09:40, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Myanmar women's international footballers which is imho a better target @Cielquiparle and Notaoffensivename:. Giant Snowman 08:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If consensus is redirect, this is definitely a better target. Ike Lek (talk) 09:24, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Sounds good. Cielquiparle (talk) 10:03, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Myanmar women's international footballers per GiantSnowman. RossEvans19 (talk) 01:54, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stadium seating

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, doesn't explain why this is called stadium seating - most venues have seating on a slope or steps. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:48, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Stadium#Spectator areas and seating. That section alone does a sufficient job at covering this topic. Grapesoda22 (talk) 02:36, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - I believe they are trying to describe a piece of theatre terminology, admittedly quite poorly, so I don't think that merge is appropriate. Ike Lek (talk) 06:01, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Theater (structure)#Seating and audience. Currently this fails WP:DICDEF, but this is mainly a theatrical term, not a stadium-related term. For seats in stadiums, these are mostly referred to as "bleachers" in the US. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Western Indiana Community Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this local-ish nonprofit in Indiana seems to do good work, I don't think this meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. What sourcing I can turn up is either passing mentions, not independent, or otherwise not contributing to notability. There are issues with promotional tone in the article ("It is a combination of all these basic characteristics that makes WICF a true community foundation, although there are other types of community organizations in Fountain and Vermillion County that have some of these characteristics.") and this has been tagged as unsourced for several years. I just don't see a GNG or NORG pass here. Hog Farm _Talk 00:43, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Indiana. Hog Farm _Talk 00:43, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]